Acidity, basicity, and the stability of hydrogen bonds: Complexes of RO- + HCF3

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 120, Issue 42, 1998, Pages 10863-10870

  Chabinyc, Michael L ^a   Brauman, John I ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; FLUOROFORM; ION;

ALKALINITY; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; COMPLEX FORMATION; ELECTRICITY; ENERGY; HYDROGEN BOND; MOLECULE; PH; SPECTROSCOPY;

EID: 0032576118     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja9817592     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Pimentel, G. C.; McClellan, A. L. The Hydrogen Bond; Freeman: San Francisco, 1960.
2. Buckingham, A. D. In Theoretical Treatments of Hydrogen Bonding; Hadzi, D., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1997.
3. Perrin, C. L.; Nielson, J. B. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1997, 48, 511-544.
4. Emsley, J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1980, 9, 91-124.
5. Jorgensen, W. Adv. Chem. Phys. 1988, 70, 469-488.
6. Ions and Ion Pairs in Organic Reactions; Szwarc, M., Ed.; Wiley-Interscience: New York, 1972.
7. Eigen, M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1964, 3, 1-19.
8. Bell, R. P. The Proton in Chemistry; Cornell University Press: Ithaca, NY, 1973.
9. Jencks, W. P. Catalysis in Chemistry and Enzymology; Dover Publications: New York, 1987.
10. Walsh, C. Enzymatic Reaction Mechanisms; W. H. Freeman: San Francisco, 1979.
11. Comprehensive Supramolecular Chemistry; Lehn, J.-M.; Atwood, J. L.; Davies, J. E. D.; MacNicol, D. D.; Vögtle, F., Ed.; Pergamon: New York, 1996.
12. Cooks, R. G.; Patrick, J. S.; Kotaiho, T.; McLuckey, S. A. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 1994, 13, 287-339.
13. Guthrie, J. P. Chem. Biol. 1996, 3, 163-170.
14. Gerlt, J. A.; Kreevoy, M. M.; Cleland, W. W.; Frey, P. A. Chem. Biol. 1997, 4, 259-267.
15. Kebarle, P. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1977, 28, 445-476.
16. Shan, S.-O.; Loh, S.; Herschlag, D. Science 1996, 272, 97-101.
17. Caldwell, G.; Rozeboom, M. D.; Kiplinger, J. P.; Bartmess, J. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 4660-4667.
18. Meot-Ner, M.; Sieck, L. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 7525-7529.
19. Larson, J. W.; McMahon, T. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 6230-6236.
20. Kreevoy, M. M.; Liang, T. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 3315-3322.
21. Stahl, N.; Jencks, W. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 4196-4205.
22. Meot-Ner, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 1257-1264.
23. Perrin, C. L.; Nielson, J. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 12734-12741.
24. Gatev, G. G.; Zhong, M.; Brauman, J. I. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 1997, 10, 531-536.
25. Meot-Ner, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 3858-3862.
26. French, M. A.; Ikuta, S.; Kebarle, P. Can. J. Chem. 1982, 60, 1907-1918.
27. Fraser, G. T.; Lovas, F. J.; Suenram, R. D.; Nelson, D. D., Jr.; Kemperer, W. J. Chem. Phys. 1986, 84, 5983-5988.
28. Lias, S. G.; Bartmess, J. E.; Liebman, J. F.; Holmes, J. L.; Levin, R. D.; Mallard, W. G. 1988, 17, Suppl. 1.
29. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 75th ed.; Lide, D. R., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, 1994.
30. Han, C.-C.; Brauman, J. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 6491-6496.
31. Andreades, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1964, 86, 2003-2010.
32. Hanst, P. L.; Calvert, J. G. J. Phys. Chem. 1959, 63, 104.
33. Wilbur, J. L. Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University, 1993.
34. McDonald, R. N.; Chowdhury, A. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 7267-7271.
35. Blair, L. K.; Isolani, P. C.; Riveros, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 1057-1060.
36. DePuy, C.; Grabowski, J. J.; Bierbaum, V. M.; Ingemann, S.; Nibbering, N. M. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 1093-1098.
37. - product.
38. DePuy, C. H.; Bierbaum, V. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 5034-5038.
39. Frisch, M. J.; et al. Gaussian94RevC.3; Gaussian, Inc.: Pittsburgh, PA, 1995.
40. Scott, A. P.; Radom, L. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 16502-16513.
41. Smith, B. J.; Radom, L. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1995, 245, 123-128.
42. MacSpartan; Wavefunction, Inc.: Irvine, 1996.
43. Truhlar, D. G. J. Comput. Phys. 1972, 10, 123-132.
44. Laane, J. Appl. Spectrosc. 1970, 24, 73-80.
45. Examination of the normal coordinates shows that this is a reasonable approximation for the systems considered here.
46. Paul, G. J. C.; Kebarle, P. J. Phys. Chem. 1990, 94, 5184-5189.
47. East, A. L. L.; Radom, L. J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 106, 6655-6674.
48. Benson, S. W. Thermochemical Kinetics, 2nd ed.; Wiley: New York, 1976.
49. - is equal to the difference in ΔH°.
50. Yates, B. F.; Schaefer, H. F., III; Lee, T. J.; Rice, J. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 6327-6332.
51. Del Bene, J. E.; Jordan, M. J. T. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 108, 3205-3212.
52. Shimanouchi, T. Tables of Molecular Vibrational Frequencies Consolidated; National Standard Reference Data Service: Washington, 1972; Vol. I.
53. Note that the difference between these values is ∼10-15 kcal/mol, which is similar to the estimated strength of the hydrogen bonds in solution, refs 13 and 16.
54. Larson, J. W.; McMahon, T. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 2944-2950.
55. Moylan, C. R.; Dodd, J. A.; Han, C.-C.; Brauman, J. I. J. Chem. Phys. 1987, 86, 5350-5357.
56. Mihalick, J. E.; Gatev, G. G.; Brauman, J. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 12424-12431.
57. de Beer, E.; Kim, E. H.; Neumark, D. M.; Gunion, R. F.; Lineberger, W. C. J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 99, 13627-13636.
58. Wilkinson, F. E.; Szulejko, J. E.; Allison, C. E.; McMahon, T. B. Int. J. Mass. Spectrom. Ion Proc. 1992, 117, 487-505.
59. Cao, H. Z.; Allavena, M.; Tapia, O.; Evleth, E. M. J. Phys. Chem. 1985, 89, 1581-1592.
60. Gronert, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 10258-10266.
61. Wladkowski, B. D.; East, A. L. L.; Mihalick, J. E.; Allen, W. D.; Brauman, J. I. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 100, 2058-2088.
62. Bradforth, S. E.; Arnold, D. W.; Metz, R. B.; Weaver, A.; Neumark, D. M. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 8066-8078.
63. Miller, T. M.; Viggiano, A. A.; Stevens-Miller, A. E.; Morris, R. A.; Henchman, M.; Paulson, J. F.; Doren, J. M. V. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 100, 5706-5714.
64. There are similar interesting observations involving proton-bound cluster ions where the structure is determined by interactions between multiple protonation sites of differing basicity. See: Böhringer, H.; Arnold, F. Nature 1981, 290, 321-322. Graul, S. T.; Squires, R. R. Int. J. Mass. Spectrom. Ion Proc. 1989, 94, 41-61.
65. There are similar interesting observations involving proton-bound cluster ions where the structure is determined by interactions between multiple protonation sites of differing basicity. See: Böhringer, H.; Arnold, F. Nature 1981, 290, 321-322. Graul, S. T.; Squires, R. R. Int. J. Mass. Spectrom. Ion Proc. 1989, 94, 41-61.
66. Huskey, W. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 1663-1668.
67. Westheimer, F. H. Chem. Rev. 1961, 61, 265-273.
68. Marcus, R. A. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1964, 15, 155-196.
69. -1. S. L. Craig and M. L. Chabinyc, unpublished results.
70. Weil, D. A.; Dixon, D. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 6859-6865.
71. Barlow, S. E.; Dang, T. T.; Bierbaum, V. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 6832-6838.
72. Ellenberger, M. R.; Farneth, W. E.; Dixon, D. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1981, 85, 4-7.
73. The one-dimensional model may not produce quantitatively accurate vibrational frequencies, refs 50 and 51, and also neglects the other modes, such as bending, that are affected by isotopic substitution. However, these effects are expected to be small compared to the shift of the H/D stretching frequency, ref 66.
74. Fluoroform is calculated to be less acidic than ethanol by 1.0 kcal/ mol at this level of theory compared to the experimental difference of -0.8 kcal/mol. This deficiency should not affect the conclusions from the calculated PES's.
75. Chalasinski, G.; Kendall, R. A.; Simons, J. J. Chem. Phys. 1987, 87, 2965-2975.
76. Wiberg, K. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 3379-3385.
77. Electrostatics do not provide a quantitative means to calculate the hydrogen bond strength since the charge distributions are certainly perturbed at the close range of interaction of the ion and neutral. They do, however, provide a useful model to interpret the energy difference between the two isomeric hydrogen bonded complexes.