Rvs161p interacts with Fus2p to promote cell fusion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Journal of Cell Biology

Volumn 141, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 567-584

  Brizzio, Valeria ^a   Gammie, Alison E ^a   Rose, Mark D ^a  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYTOSKELETON PROTEIN; PHEROMONE; PROTEIN FUS2P; PROTEIN RVS161P; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CELL FUSION; CELL VIABILITY; CYTOSKELETON; ENDOCYTOSIS; GENE FUSION; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN STABILITY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

ACTINS; ALLELES; CYTOSKELETAL PROTEINS; ENDOCYTOSIS; FUNGAL PROTEINS; GENE DELETION; GENE EXPRESSION; MEMBRANE FUSION; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; PEPTIDES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 0032482228     PISSN: 00219525     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.141.3.567     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Adams, A.E., and J.R. Pringle. 1984. Relationship of actin and tubulin distribution to bud growth in wild-type and morphogenetic-mutant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 98:934-945.
2. Bauer, F., M. Urdaci, M. Aigle, and M. Crouzet. 1993. Alteration of a yeast SH3 protein leads to conditional viability with defects in cytoskeletal and budding patterns. Mol. Cell Biol. 13:5070-5084.
3. Benedetti, H., S. Raths, F. Crausaz, and H. Riezman. 1994. The END3 gene encodes a protein that is required for the internalization step of endocytosis and for actin cytoskeleton organization in yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell. 5:1023-1037.
4. Berlin, V., J. Brill, J. Trueheart, J. Boeke, and G. Fink. 1991. Genetic screens and selections for cell and nuclear fusion mutants. Methods Enzymol. 194: 774-792.
5. Brizzio, V., A.E. Gammie, G. Nijbroek, S. Michaelis, and M.D. Rose. 1996. Cell fusion during yeast mating requires high levels of a-factor mating pheromone. J. Cell Biol. 135:1727-1739.
6. Butler, M.H., C. David, G.C. Ochoa, Z. Freyberg, L. Daniell, D. Grabs, O. Cremona, and P. De Camilli. 1997. Amphiphysin II (SH3P9; BIN1), a member of the amphiphysin/Rvs family, is concentrated in the cortical cytomatrix of axon initial segments and nodes of ranvier in brain and around T tubules in skeletal muscle. J. Cell Biol. 137:1355-1367.
7. Crouzet, M., M. Urdaci, L. Dulau, and M. Aigle. 1991. Yeast mutant affected for viability upon nutrient starvation: characterization and cloning of the RVS161 gene. Yeast. 7:727-743.
8. David, C., P.S. McPherson, O. Mundigl, and P. de Camilli. 1996. A role of am-phiphysin in synaptic vesicle endocytosis suggested by its binding to dynamin in nerve terminals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 93:331-335.
9. David, C., M. Solimena, and P. De Camilli. 1994. Autoimmunity in stiff-man syndrome with breast cancer is targeted to the C-terminal region of human amphiphysin, a protein similar to the yeast proteins, Rvs167 and Rvs161. FEBS Lett. 351:73-79.
10. Desfarges, L., P. Durrens, H. Juguelin, C. Cassagne, M. Bonneu, and M. Aigle. 1993. Yeast mutants affected in viability upon starvation have a modified phospholipid composition. Yeast. 9:267-277.
11. Donnelly, S.F., M.J. Pocklington, D. Pallotta, and E. Orr. 1993. A proline-rich protein, verprolin, involved in cytoskeletal organization and cellular growth in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Microbiol. 10:585-596.
12. Dorer, R., C. Boone, T. Kimbrough, J. Kim, and L.H. Hartwell. 1997. Genetic analysis of default mating behavior in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 146:39-55.
13. Dulic, V., M. Egerton, I. Elguindi, S. Raths, B. Singer, and H. Riezman. 1991. Yeast endocytosis assays. Methods Enzymol. 194:697-710.
14. Durrens, P., E. Revardel, M. Bonneu, and M. Aigle. 1995. Evidence for a branched pathway in the polarized cell division of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr. Genet. 27:213-216.
15. Elia, L., and L. Marsh. 1996. Role of the ABC transporter Ste6 in cell fusion during yeast conjugation, J. Cell Biol. 135:741-751.
16. Elion, E.A., P.L. Grisafi, and G.R. Fink. 1990. FUS3 encodes a cdc2/CDC28-related kinase required for the transition from mitosis into conjugation. Cell 60:649-664.
17. Elion, E.A., B. Satterberg, and J.E. Kranz. 1993. FUS3 phosphorylates multiple components of the mating signal transduction cascade: evidence for STE12 and FAR1. Mol. Biol. Cell. 4:495-510.
18. Elion, E.A., J. Trueheart, and G.R. Fink. 1995. Fus2 localizes near the site of cell fusion and is required for both cell fusion and nuclear alignment during zygote formation. J. Cell. Biol. 130:1283-1296.
19. Erdman, S., L. Lin, M.D. Malczynski, and M. Snyder. 1998. Pheromone-regulated genes required for yeast mating differentiation. J. Cell. Biol. 140:461-483.
20. Ford, S., and J. Pringle. 1986. Development of spatial organization during the formation of zygotes and shmoos in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 2(Suppl.):114.
21. Gammie, A.E., L.J. Kurihara, R.B. Vallee, and M.D. Rose. 1995. DNM1, a dynamin-related gene, participates in endosomal trafficking in yeast. J. Cell Biol. 130:553-566.
22. Gammie, A.E., V. Brizzio, and M.D. Rose. 1998. Distinct morphological phenotypes of cell fusion mutants. Mol. Biol. Cell. In press.
23. Grabs, D., V.I. Slepnev, Z. Songyang, C. David, M. Lynch, L.C. Cantley, and P. De Camilli. 1997. The SH3 domain of amphiphysin binds the proline-rich domain of dynamin at a single site that defines a new SH3 binding consensus sequence. J. Biol. Chem. 272:13419-13425.
24. Hasek, J., I. Rupes, J. Svobodova, and E. Streiblova. 1987. Tubulin and actin topology during zygote formation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Gen. Microbiol. 133:3355-3363.
25. Herskowitz, I. 1995. MAP kinase pathways in yeast: for mating and more. Cell. 80:187-197.
26. Holtzman, D.A., S. Yang, and D.G. Drubin. 1993. Synthetic-lethal interactions identify two novel genes, SLA1 and SLA2, that control membrane cytoskeleton assembly in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 122:635-644.
27. Ito, H., Y. Fukuda, K. Murata, and A. Kimura. 1983. Transformation of intact yeast cells treated with alkali cations. J. Bacterial. 153:163-168.
28. Kilmartin, J.V., and A.E. Adams. 1984. Structural rearrangements of tubulin and actin during the cell cycle of the yeast Saccharomyces. J. Cell Biol. 98: 922-933.
29. Konopka, J.B., and S. Fields. 1992. The pheromone signal pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Antonie Leeuwenhoek. 62:95-108.
30. Kurihara, L.J., C.T. Beh, M. Latterich, R. Schekman, and M.D. Rose. 1994. Nuclear congression and membrane fusion: two distinct events in the yeast karyogamy pathway. J. Cell Biol. 126:911-923.
31. Kurihara, L.J., E.G. Stewart, A.E. Gammie, and M.D. Rose. 1996. Kar4p, a karyogamy-specific component of the yeast pheromone response pathway. Mol. Cell Biol. 16:3990-4002.
32. Lichte, B., R.W. Veh, H,E. Meywer, and M.W. Kiliman. 1992. Amphiphysin, a novel protein associated with synaptic vesicles. EMBO (Eur. Mol. Biol. Organ) J. 11:2521-2530.
33. Lipke, P.N., and J. Kurjan. 1992. Sexual agglutination in budding yeasts: structure, function, and regulation of adhesion glycoproteins. Microbiol. Rev. 56: 180-194.
34. Liu, H., and A. Bretscher. 1992. Characterization of TPM1 disrupted yeast cells indicates an involvement of tropomyosin in directed vesicular transport. J. Cell Biol. 118:285-299.
35. Marsh, L., and M.D. Rose. 1997. The pathway of cell and nuclear fusion during mating in S. cerevisiae. In The Molecular and Cellular Biology of the Yeast Saccharomyces: Cell Cycle and Cell Biology. J.R. Pringle, J.R. Broach, and E.W. Jones, editors. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY. 827-888.
36. McCaffrey, G., F.J. Clay, K. Kelsay, and G.F. Sprague. Jr. 1987. Identification and regulation of a gene required for cell fusion during mating of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 7:2680-2690.
37. Mitchell, D.A., T.K. Marshall, and R.J. Deschenes. 1993. Vectors for the inducible overexpression of glutathione S-transferase fusion proteins in yeast. Yeast. 9:715-722.
38. Munn, A.L., and H. Riezman. 1994. Endocytosis is required for the growth of vacuolar H(+)-ATPase-defective yeast: identification of six new END genes. J. Cell Biol. 127:373-386.
39. Munn, A.L., B.J. Stevenson, M.I. Geli, and H. Riezman. 1995. end5, end6, and end7: mutations that cause actin delocalization and block the internalization step of endocytosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell. 6:1721-1742.
40. Ohashi, A., J. Gibson, I. Gregor, and G, Schatz. 1982. Import of proteins into mitochondria. The precursor of cytochrome c1 is processed in two steps, one of them heme-dependent. J. Biol. Chem. 257:13042-13047.
41. Osumi, M., C. Shimoda, and N. Yanagishima. 1974. Mating reaction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. V. Changes in the fine structure during the mating reaction. Arch. Microbiol. 97:27-38.
42. Philips, J., and I. Herskowitz. 1997. Osmotic balance regulates cell fusion during mating in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 138:961-974.
43. Pringle, J.R., A.E. Adams, D.G. Drubin, and B.K. Haarer. 1991. Immunofluo-rescence methods for yeast. Methods Enzymol. 194:565-602.
44. Raths, S., J. Rohrer, F. Crausaz, and H. Riezman. 1993. end3 and end4: two mutants defective in receptor-mediated and fluid-phase endocytosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 120:55-65.
45. Read, E.B., H.H. Okamura, and D.G. Drubin. 1992. Actin-and tubulin-dependent functions during Saccharomyces cerevisiae mating projection formation. Mol. Biol. Cell. 3:429-444.
46. Revardel, E., M. Bonneau, P. Durrens, and M. Aigle. 1995. Characterization of a new gene family developing pleiotropic phenotypes upon mutation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1263:261-265.
47. Riezman, H., A. Munn, M.I. Geli, and L. Hicke. 1996. Actin-. myosin-and ubiquitin-dependent endocytosis. Experientia. 52:1033-1041.
48. Rose, M.D. 1991. Nuclear fusion in yeast. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 45:539-567.
49. Rose, M.D. 1996. Nuclear fusion in the yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Anna. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 12:663-693.
50. Rose, M.D., P. Novick, J.H. Thomas, D. Botstein, and G.R. Fink. 1987. A Saccharomyces cerevisiae genomic plasmid bank based on a centromere-containing shuttle vector. Gene. 60:237-243.
51. Rose, M.D., F. Winston, and P. Hieter. 1990. Methods of Yeast Genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY. 198.
52. Rothstein, R. 1991. Targeting, disruption, replacement, and allele rescue: integrative DNA transformation in yeast. Methods Enzymol. 194:281-301.
53. Santos, B., A. Duran, and M.H. Valdivieso. 1997. CHS5, a gene involved in chitin synthesis and mating in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell Biol. 17: 2485-2496.
54. Scherer, S., and R.W. Davis. 1979. Replacement of chromosome segments with altered DNA sequences constructed in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 76: 4951-4955.
55. Scidmore, M. 1993. A genetic analysis of KAR2, the yeast homologue of mammalian BiP. Ph.D. thesis. Department of Molecular Biology. Princeton University, Princeton, NJ. 255.
56. Shupliakov, O., P. Low, D. Grabs, H. Gad, H. Chen, C. David, K. Takei, P. De Camilli, and L. Brodin. 1997. Synaptic vesicle endocytosis impaired by disruption of dynamin-SH3 domain interactions. Science. 276:259-263.
57. Sikorski, R., and P. Hieter. 1989. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 122:19-27.
58. Sivadon, P., F. Bauer, M. Aigle, and M. Crouzet. 1995. Actin cytoskeleton and budding pattern are altered in the yeast rvs161 mutant: the Rvs161 protein shares common domains with the brain protein amphiphysin. Mol. Gen. Genet. 246:485-495.
59. Sivadon, P., M. Crouzet, and M. Aigle. 1997a. Functional assessment of the yeast Rvs161 and Rvs167 protein domains. FEBS Lett. 417:21-27.
60. Sivadon, P., M.F. Peypouquet, F. Doignon, M. Aigle, and M. Crouzet. 1997b. Cloning of the multicopy suppressor gene SUR7: evidence for a functional relationship between the yeast actin-binding protein Rvs167 and a putative membranous protein. Yeast. 13: 747-761.
61. Sprague, G.F., and J.W. Thorner. 1992. Pheromone response and signal transduction during the mating process of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In The Molecular and Cellular Biology of the Yeast Saccharomyces: Gene Expression. Vol. 2. E.W. Jones, J.R. Pringle, and J.R. Broach, editors. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY. 657-744.
62. Tang, H.Y., A. Munn, and M. Cai. 1997. EH domain proteins Panlp and End3p are components of a complex that plays a dual role in organization of the cortical actin cytoskeleton and endocytosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell Biol. 17:4294-4304.
63. Trueheart, J., J.D. Boeke, and G.R. Fink. 1987. Two genes required for cell fusion during yeast conjugation: evidence for a pheromone-induced surface protein. Mol. Cell Biol. 7:2316-2328.
64. Trueheart, J., and G.R. Fink. 1989. The yeast cell fusion protein FUS1 is O-glycosylated and spans the plasma membrane. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 86: 9916-9920.
65. Zoladek, T., G. Vaduva, L.A. Hunter, M. Boguta, B.D. Go, N.C. Martin, and A.K. Hopper. 1995. Mutations altering the mitochondrial-cytoplasmic distribution of Mod5p implicate the actin cytoskeleton and mRNA 3′ ends and/or protein synthesis in mitochondrial delivery. Mol. Cell Biol. 15:6884-6894.