Phylogenetic analysis and relationships in hydrophyllaceae based on ndhF sequence data

Systematic Botany

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 253-268

  Ferguson, Diane M ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032459998     PISSN: 03636445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2419504     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. ATWOOD, N. D. 1975. A revision of the Phacelia Crenulatae group (Hydrophyllaceae) for North America. Great Basin Naturalist 35: 127-190.
2. BACON, J. D. 1989a. Seed coat morphology of Draperia systyla (Hydrophyllaceae) and its importance to the systematics of Nama. Sida 13: 461-466.
3. _. 1989b. Systematics of Nama (Hydrophyllaceae): Reevaluation of the taxonomic status of Lemmonia californica. Aliso 12: 327-333.
4. _, L. H. BRAGG, and G. L. HANNAN. 1986a. Systematics of Nama (Hydrophyllaceae): Comparison of seed morphology of sects. Arachnoidea and Cinerascentia with five species of Eriodictyon and Turricula parryi. Sida 11: 271-281.
5. _, N. FANG, and T. J. MABRY. 1986b. Systematics of Nama (Hydrophyllaceae): Flavonoids and phyletic position of sect. Arachnoidea and sect. Cinerascentia. Plant Systematics and Evolution 151: 223-228.
6. _, G. L. HANNAN, N. FANG, and T. J. MABRY. 1986c. Chemosystematics of the Hydrophyllaceae: Flavonoids of three species of Eriodictyon. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 14: 591-595.
7. BARTLING, F. 1830. Ordines naturales plantarum. Gottingen: Dieterich.
8. BECKMANN, R. L., Jr. 1979. Biosystematics of the genus Hydrophyllum L. (Hydrophyllaceae). American Journal of Botany 66: 1053-1061.
9. BENTHAM, G. and J. D. HOOKER. 1876. Genera plantarum, vol. 2. London: Williams and Norgate.
10. BRAND, A. 1913. Hydrophyllaceae. Pp. 1-210 in Das Pflanzenreich, vol. 4, no. 251, ed. A. Engler. Leipzig: Engelmann.
11. BROWN, R. 1810. Prodromus florae novae hollandiae, vol. 1. London: J. Johnson and Co.
12. _. 1818. Observations, systematical and geographical, on Professor Christian Smith's collection of plants from the vicinity of the river Congo. Pp. 420-485 in Narrative of an expedition to explore the river Zaire, ed. J. K. Tuckey. London: John Murray.
13. CANDOLLE, A. DE. 1845. Hydrophyllaceae. Pp. 287-301 in Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis, ed. A. de Candolle. Paris: Treuttel and Würtz.
14. CAVE, M. S. and L. CONSTANCE. 1942. Chromosome numbers in the Hydrophyllaceae. University of California Publications in Botany 18: 205-216.
15. _ and _. 1944. Chromosome numbers in the Hydrophyllaceae: II. University of California Publications in Botany 18: 293-298.
16. _ and _. 1947. Chromosome numbers in the Hydrophyllaceae: III. University of California Publications in Botany 18: 449-465.
17. _ and _. 1950. Chromosome numbers in the Hydrophyllaceae: IV. University of California Publications in Botany 23: 363-382.
18. _ and _. 1959. Chromosome numbers in the Hydrophyllaceae: V. University of California Publications in Botany 30: 233-258.
19. CHANCE, G. D. and J. D. BACON. 1984. Systematic implications of seed coat morphology in Nama (Hydrophyllaceae). American Journal of Botany 71: 829-842.
20. CHASE, M. W., D. E. SOLTIS, R. G. OLMSTEAD, D. MORGAN, D. H. LES, B. D. MISHLER, M. R. DUVALL, R. A. PRICE, H. G. HILLS, Y.-L. QIU, K. A. KRON, J. H. RETTIG, E. CONTI, J. D. PALMER, J. R. MANHART, K. J. SYTSMA, H. J. MICHAELS, W. J. KRESS, K. G. KAROL, W. D. CLARK, M. HEDRÉN, B. S. GAUT, R. K. JANSEN, K.-J. KIM, C. F. WIMPEE, J. F. SMITH, G. R. FURNIER, S. H. STRAUSS, Q. XIANG, G. M. PLUNKETT, P. S. SOLTIS, S. M. SWENSEN, S. E. WILLIAMS, P. A. GADEK, C. J. QUINN, L. E. EGUIARTE, E. GOLENBERG, G. H. LEARN JR., S. W. GRAHAM, S. C. H. BARRETT, S. DAYANANDAN, and V. A. ALBERT. 1993. Phylogenetics of seed plants: An analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 528-580.
21. CHOISY, J. D. 1846. Hydroleaceae. Pp. 179-185 in Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis, ed. A. de Candolle. Paris: Treuttel and Würtz.
22. CHUANG, T. I. and L. CONSTANCE. 1992. Seeds and systematics in Hydrophyllaceae. American Journal of Botany 79: 257-264.
23. CLARK, L. G., W. ZHANG, and J. F. WENDEL. 1995. A phylogeny of the grass family (Poaceae) based on ndhF sequence data. Systematic Botany 20: 436-460.
24. CONSTANCE, L. 1938. The genus Eucrypta Nutt. Lloydia 1: 143-152.
25. _. 1939a. The genera of the tribe Hydrophylleae of the Hydrophyllaceae. Madroño 5: 28-33.
26. _. 1939b. The genus Pholistoma Lilja. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 66: 341-352.
27. _. 1940. The genus Ellisia. Rhodora 42: 33-39.
28. _. 1941. The genus Nemophila Nutt. University of California Publications in Botany 19: 341-398.
29. _. 1942. The genus Hydrophyllum L. American Midland Naturalist 27: 710-731.
30. _. 1949. A revision of Phacelia subgenus Cosmanthus (Hydrophyllaceae). Contributions to the Gray Herbarium 168: 1-48.
31. _. 1950. Some interspecific relationships in Phacelia subgenus Cosmanthus. Proceedings of the American Academy 78: 135-147.
32. _. 1952. Howellanthus, a new subgenus of Phacelia. Madroño 11: 198-203.
33. _. 1963. Chromosome number and classification in Hydrophyllaceae. Brittonia 15: 273-285.
34. _ and T. I. Chuang. 1982. SEM survey of pollen morphology and classification in Hydrophyllaceae (waterleaf family). American Journal of Botany 69: 40-53.
35. COSNER, M. E., R. K. JANSEN, and T. G. LAMMERS. 1994. Phylogeneric relationships in the Campanulales based on rbcL sequences. Plant Systematics and Evolution 190: 79-95.
36. CRONQUIST, A. 1981. An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. New York: Columbia University Press.
37. DAVENPORT, L. J. 1988. A monograph of Hydrolea (Hydrophyllaceae). Rhodora 90: 169-208.
38. DEMPCY, J. M. and R. PATTERSON. 1995. Phylogenetic relationships in Phacelia sect. Euglypta (Hydrophyllaceae) based on ITS sequence data. American Journal of Botany (supplement) 82: 124-125.
39. DI FULVIO, T. E. 1987. La endospermogenesis en Hydrophylleae (Hydrophyllaceae) con relacion a la taxonomia. Kurtziana 19: 13-34.
40. _ and N. DOTTORI. 1995. Contribución al conocimiento de tricomas y emergencias en Hydrophyllaceae. Clasificación y consideraceones taxonómicas. Kurtziana 24: 19-64.
41. DOYLE, J. J. and E. E. DICKSON. 1987. Preservation of plant samples for DNA restriction endonuclease analysis. Taxon 36: 715-722.
42. DUMORTIER, B. C. J. 1829. Analyse des familles des plantes. Tournay: J. Casterman.
43. EDWARDS, S. 1817. Hydrophyllum canadense. Edward's Botanical Register 3: 242.
44. ENDLICHER, S. 1839. Genera plantarum. Wien: Friedrich Beck.
45. ERIKSSON, T. and M. J. DONOGHUE. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships of Sambucus and Adoxa (Adoxoideae, Adoxaceae) based on nuclear ribosomal ITS sequences and preliminary morphological data. Systematic Botany 22: 555-574.
46. FARRIS, J. S., V. A. ALBERT, M. KÄLLERSJÖ, D. LIPSCOMB, and A. G. KLUGE. 1996. Parsimony jackknifing outperforms neighbor-joining. Cladistics 12: 99-124.
47. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1978. Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Systematic Zoology 27: 401-110.
48. FERGUSON, D. M. 1996. Phylogenetic analysis of Hydrophyllaceae and a preliminary study of biogeographic patterns and life history evolution. American Journal of Botany (supplement) 83: 155-156.
49. _. 1997. Phylogenetic systematics of Hydrophyllaceae, as inferred from the chloroplast gene ndhF and the nuclear rDNA ITS region. American Journal of Botany (supplement) 84: 557.
50. GILLETT, G. W. 1955. Variation and genetic relationships in the Whitlavia and Gymnobythus phacelias. University of California Publications in Botany 28: 19-78.
51. _. 1960. A systematic treatment of the Phacelia franklinii group. Rhodora 62: 205-222.
52. GRAY, A. 1875. A conspectus of the North American Hydrophyllaceae. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 10: 312-332.
53. HALSE, R. R. 1981. Taxonomy of Phacelia sect. Miltitzia (Hydrophyllaceae). Madroño 28: 121-132.
54. HECKARD, L. R. 1960. Taxonomic studies in the Phacelia magellanica polyploid complex. University of California Publications in Botany 32: 1-126.
55. HEYWOOD, V. H. 1978. Flowering plants of the world. New York: Mayflower Books.
56. HIGGINS, D. and P. M. SHARP. 1988. CLUSTAL: A package for performing multiple sequence alignments on a microcomputer. Gene 73: 237-244.
57. HITCHCOCK, C. L. 1933a. A taxonomic study of the genus Nama. I. American Journal of Botany 20: 415-430.
58. _. 1933b. A taxonomic study of the genus Nama. II. American Journal of Botany 20: 518-534.
59. _. 1939. The perennial Mexican namas. American Journal of Botany 26: 341-347.
60. HOWELL, J. T. 1943a. Studies in Phacelia - a revision of species related to P. pulchella and P. rotundifolia. American Midland Naturalist 29: 1-26.
61. _. 1943b. Sertulum Greeneanum. American Midland Naturalist 30: 6-39.
62. _. 1944a. A reconsideration of the genus Miltitzia. Leaflets in Western Botany 4: 12-16.
63. _. 1944b. A revision of Phacelia sect. Miltitzia. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences 25: 357-376.
64. _. 1945. Studies in Phacelia-Tevision of species related to P. douglasii, P. linearis, and P. pringlei. American Midland Naturalist 33: 460-494.
65. _. 1946. A revision of Phacelia sect. Euglypta. American Midland Naturalist 36: 381-411.
66. JOHNSTON, I. M. 1950. Studies in the Boraginaceae, XIX. A. Noteworthy species from tropical America. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 31: 172-179.
67. JUSSIEU, A. L. DE. 1789. Genera plantarum secundum ordines naturales disposita, 1st ed. Paris: Herissant and Barrois.
68. KIM, K.-J. and R. K. JANSEN. 1995. ndhF sequence evolution and the major clades in the sunflower family. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 92: 10,379-10,383.
69. LAWRENCE, G. H. M. 1951. Taxonomy of vascular plants. New York: The Macmillan Company.
70. LEE, G. J. 1986. Systematic studies in the Phacelia humilis group (Hydrophyllaceae): Corolla venation patterns. American Journal of Botany 73: 230-235.
71. LINDLEY, J. 1836. A natural system of botany, 2nd edition. London: Longman, Rees, Oram, Brown, Green, and Longman.
72. MADDISON, W. P. and D. R. MADDISON. 1992. MacClade: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution, version 3. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc.
73. MARTTALA, V. M. 1996. Romanzoffia thompsonii (Hydrophyllaceae), a new species from Oregon. Madroño 43: 404-414.
74. MASON-GAMER, R. J. and E. A. KELLOGG. 1996. Testing for phylogenetic conflict among molecular data sets in the tribe Triticeae (Gramineae). Systematic Biology 45: 524-545.
75. MORTON, B. R. 1997. The influence of neighboring base composition on substitutions in plant chloroplast coding sequences. Molecular Biology and Evolution 14: 189-194.
76. NEYLAND, R. and L. E. URBATSCH. 1995. A terrestrial origin for the Orchidaceae suggested by a phylogeny inferred from ndhF chloroplast gene sequences. Lindleyana 10: 244-251.
77. _ and _. 1996. Phylogeny of subfamily Epidendroideae (Orchidaceae) inferred from ndhF chloroplast gene sequences. American Journal of Botany 83: 1,195-1,206.
78. OLMSTEAD, R. G. and P. A. REEVES. 1995. Evidence for the polyphyly of the Scrophulariaceae based on chloroplast rbcL and ndhF sequences. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 82: 176-193.
79. _ and J. A. SWEERE. 1994. Combining data in phylogenetic systematics: An empirical approach using three molecular data sets in the Solanaceae. Systematic Biology 43: 467-481.
80. _, B. BREMER, K. M. SCOTT, and J. D. PALMER. 1993. A parsimony analysis of the Asteridae sensu lato based on rbcL sequences. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 700-722.
81. _, H. J. MICHAELS, K. M. SCOTT, and J. D. PALMER. 1992a. Monophyly of the Asteridae and identification of their major lineages inferred from DNA sequences of rbcL. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 79: 249-265.
82. _, R. SCOTLAND, S. WAGSTAFF, J. SWEERE, and P. REEVES. 1992b. Application of the chloroplast gene ndhF to angiosperm phylogenetic studies. Plant Molecular Evolution Newsletter 2: 27-30.
83. PATTERSON, R. W. (family editor). 1993. Hydrophyllaceae. Pp. 683-711 in The Jepson manual: higher plants of California, ed. J. C. Hickman. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
84. PETER, A. 1897. Hydrophyllaceae. Pp. 54-71 in Die natürlichen pflanzenfamilien, IV Tiel, 3a, eds. A. Engler and K. Prantl. Leipzig: Engelmann.
85. SIMS, J. 1823. Nemophila phacelioides. Arkansian Nemophila. Curtis Botanical Magazine 50: 2,373.
86. SCOTLAND, R. W., J. A. SWEERE, P. A. REEVES and R. G. OLMSTEAD. 1995. Higher-level systematics of Acanthaceae determined by chloroplast DNA sequences. American Journal of Botany 82: 266-275.
87. SOKAL, R. R. and F. J. ROHLF. 1995. Biometry, 3rd ed. New York: W.H. Freeman and Co.
88. SWOFFORD, D. L., G. J. OLSEN, P. J. WADDELL, and D. M. HILLIS. 1996. Phylogenetic inference. Pp. 407-514 in Molecular Systematics, 2nd ed., eds. D. M. Hillis, C. Moritz and B. K. Mable. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc.
89. TEMPLETON, A. R. 1983. Phylogenetic inference from restriction endonuclease cleavage site maps with particular reference to the evolution of humans and the apes. Evolution 37: 221-244.
90. VOSS, J. W. 1935. A revisional study of the Phacelia hispida group. Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Sciences 33: 169-178.
91. WAGSTAFF, S. J., L. HICKERSON, R. SPANGLER, P. A. REEVES and R. G. OLMSTEAD. 1998. Phylogeny in Labiatae s.l., inferred from cpDNA sequences. Plant Systematics and Evolution 209: 265-274.