Policy subsystem configurations and policy change: Operationalizing the postpositivist analysis of the politics of the policy process

Policy Studies Journal

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 466-481

  Howlett, Michael ^a   Ramesh, M ^b  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POLICY MAKING; POLITICAL PROCESS;

EID: 0032427636     PISSN: 00190292     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.1998.tb01913.x     Document Type: Article

References (121)

1. Aaron, H. J. (1967). Social security: International comparison. In O. Eckstein (Ed.), Studies in the economics of income maintenance (pp. 13-49). Washington DC: Brookings Institution.
2. Ashford, N. (1997). Politically impossible? How ideas, not interests and circumstances, determine public policy. Policy, 13(1), 21-25.
3. Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1991). Agenda dynamics and policy subsystems. Journal of Politics, 53(4), 1044-1074.
4. Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
5. Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1994). Attention, boundary effects, and large-scale policy change in air transportation policy. In D. A. Rochefort & R. W. Cobb (Eds.), The politics of problem definition: Shaping the policy agenda (pp. 50-66). Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.
6. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York, NY: Doubleday.
7. Blais, A., Blake, D., & Dion, S. (1993). Do parties make a difference? Parties and the size of government in liberal democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 37 (1), 40-63.
8. Blais, A., Blake, D., & Dion, S. (1996). Do parties make a difference?: A reappraisal. American Journal of Political Science, 40 (2), 514-520.
9. Blyth, M. M. (1997). Any more bright ideas? The ideational turn of comparative political economy. Comparative Politics, 29, 229-250.
10. Burstein, P. (1991). Policy domains: Organizations, culture and policy outcomes. Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 327-350.
11. Cameron, D. (1978). The expansion of the public economy: A comparative analysis. American Political Science Review, 72, 1243-1261.
12. Castles, F. G. (1979). Does politics matter?: An analysis of public welfare commitment in modern democratic states. European Journal of Political Research, 7, 169-186.
13. Castles, F. G. (1981). How does politics matter?: Structure or agency in the determination of public policy outcomes. European Journal of Political Research, 9, 119-132.
14. Castles, F. G. (1982). The impact of parties on public expenditure. In F. G. Castles (Ed.), The impact of parties: Politics and policies in democratic capitalist states (pp. 21-96). London: Sage.
15. Castles, F. G., & McKinlay, R. D. (1997). Does politics matter? Increasing complexity and renewed challenges. European Journal of Political Research, 31, 102-107.
16. Castles, F. G., & Merrill, V. (1989). Towards a general model of public policy outcomes. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 1(2), 177-212.
17. Coleman, W. D. (1994). Policy convergence in banking: A comparative study. Political Studies, 42, 274-292.
18. Coleman W. D., & Skogstad, G. (1995). Neo-liberalism, policy networks and policy change: Agricultural policy reform in Australia and Canada. Australian Journal of Political Science, 30, 242-263.
19. Coleman, W. D., Skogstad, G. D., & Atkinson, M. M. (1996). Paradigm shifts and policy networks: Cumulative change in agriculture. Journal of Public Policy, 16(3), 273-302.
20. Cutright, P. (1965). Political structure, economic development, and national security programs. American Journal of Sociology, 70, 537-550.
21. Daneke, G. A. (1992). Back to the future: Misplaced elements of political inquiry and the advanced systems agenda. In W. N. Dunn & R. M. Kelly (Eds.), Advances in policy studies since 1950 (pp. 267-290). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
22. Danziger, M. (1995). Policy analysis postmodernized: Some political and pedagogical ramifications. Policy Studies Journal, 23 (3), 435-450.
23. Daugbjerg, C. (1997). Policy networks and agricultural policy reforms: Explaining deregulation in Sweden and re-regulation in the European Community. Governance, 10 (2), 123-142.
24. deLeon, P. (1994). Democracy and the policy sciences: Aspirations and operation. Policy Studies Journal, 22(2), 200-212.
25. deLeon, P. (1998). Models of policy discourse: Inspiration versus prediction. Policy Studies Journal, 26(1), 147-161.
26. Dowding, K. (1995). Model or metaphor? A critical review of the policy network approach. Political Studies, 43, 136-158.
27. Durrant, R. F., & Diehl, P. F. (1989). Agendas, alternatives and public policy: Lessons from the U. S. foreign policy arena. Journal of Public Policy, 9(2), 179-205.
28. Edelman, M. J. (1988). Constructing the political spectacle. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
29. Eldredge, N., & Gould, S. J. (1972). Punctuated equilibria: An alternative to phyletic gradualism. In T. J. M. Schopf (Ed.), Paleobiology (pp. 82-115). San Francisco, CA: Freeman, Cooper.
30. Erikson, R. S., Wright, G. C., Jr., & McIver, J. P. (1989). Political parties, public opinion and state policy in the United States. American Political Science Review, 83 (3), 729-743.
31. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
32. Fischer, F. (1993). Policy discourses and the politics of Washington think tanks. In F. Fischer & J. Forester (Eds.), The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning (pp. 21-42). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
33. Fischer, F., & Forester, J. (Ed.). (1993). The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
34. Foucault, M. (1972). The discourse on language. In M. Foucault (Ed.), The archaeology of knowledge (pp. 215-235). New York, NY: Pantheon.
35. Frey, B. S. (1978). Politico-economic models and cycles. Journal of Public Economics, 9, 203-220.
36. Gersick, C. J. G. (1991). Revolutionary change theories: A multilevel exploration of the punctuated equilibrium paradigm. Academy of Management Review, 16, 10-36.
37. Goodin, R. E. (1998). Institutions and their design. In R. E. Goodin (Ed.), The theory of institutional design (pp. 1-53). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Grant, W., & MacNamara, A. (1995). When policy communities intersect: The case of agriculture and banking. Political Studies, 43, 509-515.
39. Haas, P. M. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy co-ordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1-36.
40. Hajer, M. A. (1993). Discourse coalitions and the institutionalization of practice: The case of acid rain in Britain. In F. Fischer & J. Forester (Eds.), The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning (pp. 43-76). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
41. Hall, P. A. (Ed.). (1989). The political power of economic ideas: Keynesianism across nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
42. Hall, P. A. (1990). Policy paradigms, experts, and the state: The case of macroeconomic policymaking in Britain. In S. Brooks & A.-G. Gagnon (Eds.), Social scientists, policy, and the state (pp. 53-78). New York, NY: Praeger.
43. Hall, P. A. (1992). The change from Keynesianism to monetarism: Institutional analysis and British economic policy in the 1970s. In S. Steinmo, K. Thelen, & F. Longstreth (Eds.), Structuring politics: Historical institutionalism in comparative analysis (pp. 90-114). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44. Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning and the state: The case of economic policy -making in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25 (3), 275-296.
45. Hayes, M. T. (1992). Incrementalism and public policy. New York, NY: Longmans. New York: HarperCollins.
46. Hayward, J. (1991). The policy community approach to industrial policy. In D. A. Rustow & K. P. Erickson (Eds.), Comparative political dynamics: Global research perspective (pp. 381-407). New York, NY: HarperCollins.
47. Heidenheimer, A. J., Heclo, H., & Adams, C. T. (1975). Comparative public policy: The politics of social choice in Europe and America. New York, NY: St. Martin's.
48. Heinz, J. P., Laumann, E. O., Salisbury, R. H., & Nelson, R. L. (1990). Inner circles or hollow cores. Journal of Politics, 52, 356-390.
49. Hendrick, R. M., & Nachmias, D. (1992). The policy sciences: The challenge of complexity. Policy Studies Review, 11 (3/4), 310-328.
50. Hernes, G. (1976). Structural change in social processes. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 513-547.
51. Hessing, M., & Hewlett, M. (1997). Canadian natural resource and environmental policy: Political economy and public policy. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
52. Hewitt, C. (1977). The effect of political democracy and social democracy on equality in industrial societies: A cross-national comparison. American Sociological Review, 42, 450-464.
53. Hibbs, D. A., Jr. (1977). Political parties and macroeconomic policy. American Political Science Review, 71, 1467-1487.
54. Hilgartner, S., & Bosk, C. L. (1981). The rise and fall of social problems: A public arenas model. American Journal of Sociology, 94 (1), 53-78.
55. Hoberg, G. (1996). Putting ideas in their place: A response to 'learning and change in the British Columbia forest policy sector. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 29(1), 135-144.
56. Hofferbert, R. I. (1974). The study of public policy. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
57. Holzner, B., & Marx, J. H. (1979). Knowledge application: The knowledge system in society. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
58. Howlett, M. (1994). Policy paradigms and policy change: Lessons from the old and new Canadian policies towards aboriginal peoples. Policy Studies Journal, 22 (4), 631-651.
59. Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (1995). Studying public policy: Policy cycles and policy subsystems. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
60. Howlett, M., and Rayner, J. (1995). Do ideas matter? Policy subsystem configurations and the continuing conflict over Canadian forest policy. Canadian Public Administration, 38 (3), 382-410.
61. Jacobsen, J. J. (1995). Much ado about ideas: The cognitive factor in economic policy. World Politics, 47, 283-310.
62. Jenkins-Smith, H. C., St. Clair, G. K., & Woods, B. (1991). Explaining change in policy subsystems: Analysis of coalition stability and defection over time. American Journal of Political Science, 35(4), 851-880.
63. Jordan, G., & Schubert, K. (1992). A preliminary ordering of policy network labels. European Journal of Political Research, 21, 7-27.
64. Kenis, P. (1991). The pre-conditions for policy networks: Some findings from a three country study on industrial re-structuring. In B. Marin & R. Mayntz (Eds.), Policy networks: Empirical evidence and theoretical considerations (pp. 297-330). Boulder, CO: Westview.
65. King, A. (1973). Ideas, institutions and the policies of governments: A comparative analysis: Part III. British Journal of Political Science, 3, 409-423.
66. King, A. (1981). What do elections decide? In D. Butler, H. R. Penniman, & A. Ranney (Eds.), Democracy at the polls: A comparative study of competitive national elections (pp. 64-79). Washington DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
67. Kingdon, J. (1984). Agendas, alternatives and public policies. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
68. Knoke, D. (1987). Political networks: The structural perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
69. Knoke, D. (1993). Networks as political glue: Explaining public policy-making. In W. J. Wilson (Ed.), Sociology and the public agenda (pp. 164-184). London: Sage
70. Knoke, D., & Pappi, F. (Eds.). (1996). Comparative policy networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
71. Korpi, W. (1983). The democratic class struggle. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
72. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
73. Kuhn, T. S. (1974). Second thoughts on paradigms. In F. Suppe (Ed.), The structure of scientific theories (pp. 459-482). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
74. Laumann, E. O., & Knoke, D. (1987). The organizational state: Social choice in national policy domains. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.
75. Lee, A. S. (1996). The causal effect of ideas on policies. International Organization, 50(1), 69-108.
76. Lertzman, K., Rayner, J., & Wilson, J. (1996). Learning and change in the British Columbia forest policy sector: A consideration of Sabatier's advocacy coalition framework. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 29, 111-133.
77. Lindblom, C. (1959). The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review, 19 (2), 79-88.
78. Locksley, G. (1980). The political business cycle: Alternative interpretations. In P. Whitely (Ed.), Models of political economy (pp. 177-198). London: Sage.
79. MacRae, D., Jr. (1993). Guidelines for policy discourse: Consensual versus adversarial. In F. Fischer & J. Forester (Eds.). The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning (pp. 291-318). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
80. Majone, G. (1989). Evidence, argument, and persuasion in the policy process. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
81. Marsh, D., & Rhodes, R. A. W. (1992). Policy communities and issue networks: Beyond typology. In D. Marsh & R. A. W. Rhodes (Eds.), Policy networks in British government (pp. 248-268). Oxford: Clarendon.
82. Masterman, M. (1970). The nature of a paradigm. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 59-89). London: Cambridge University Press.
83. Michaels, S. (1992). Issue networks and activism. Policy Studies Review, 11(3/4), 241-259.
84. Miller, L. S. (1976). The structural determinants of the welfare effort: A critique and a contribution. Social Service Review, 50, 57-79.
85. Polsby, N. W. (1984). Political innovation in America: The politics of policy initiation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
86. Pross, A. P. (1992). Group politics and public policy. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
87. Pryor, F. L. (1968). Public expenditures in communist and capitalist nations. Homewood, IL: R. D. Irwin.
88. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1984). Power-dependence, policy communities and intergovernmental networks. Public Administration Bulletin, 49, 4-31.
89. Rhodes, R. A. W., & Marsh, D. (1992). New directions in the study of policy networks. European Journal of Political Research, 21, 181-205.
90. Richardson, J. J., Maloney, W. A., & Rudig, W. (1992). The dynamics of policy change: Lobbying and water privatization. Public Administration, 70(2), 157-175.
91. Rochefort, D. A., & Cobb, R. W. (1993). Problem definition, agenda access, and policy change. Policy Studies Journal, 21 (1), 1993, 56-71.
92. Roe, E. (1994). Narrative policy analysis: Theory and practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
93. Rose, R. (1980). Do parties make a difference? London: Macmillan.
94. Sabatier, P. (1987). Knowledge, policy-oriented learning, and policy change. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 8(4), 649-692.
95. Sabatier, P. (1993). Policy change over a decade or more. In P. A. Sabatier & H. C. Jenkins-Smith (Eds.), Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach (pp. 13-40). Boulder, CO: Westview.
96. Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1993). The advocacy coalition framework: Assessment, revisions, and implications for scholars and practitioners. In P. A. Sabatier & H. C. Jenkins-Smith (Eds.), Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach (pp. 211-236). Boulder, CO: Westview.
97. Schmidt, M. G. (1996). When parties matter: A review of the possibilities and limits of partisan influence on public policy. European Journal of Political Research, 30, 155-183.
98. Schneider, F., & Frey, B. S. (1988). Politico-economic models of macroeconomic policy: A review of the empirical evidence. In T. D. Willett (Ed.), Political business cycles: The political economy of money, inflation and unemployment (pp. 239-275). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
99. Schulman, P. R. (1988). The politics of "ideational policy." Journal of Politics, 50, 263-291.
100. Shapiro, M. J. (1981). Language and political understanding: The politics of discursive practices. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
101. Sharkansky, I. (1971). Constraints on innovation in policy making: Economic development and political routines. In F. Marini (Ed.), Toward a new public administration: The Minnowbrook perspective (pp. 261-279). Scranton, PA: Chandler.
102. Simeon, R. (1976). Studying public policy. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 9, 548-580.
103. Smith, M. J. (1993). Pressure, power and policy: State autonomy and policy networks in Britain and the United States. Aldershot: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
104. Spector, M., & Kitsuse, J. I. (1987). Constructing social problems. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
105. Stewart, J. (1992). Corporatism, pluralism and political learning: A systems approach. Journal of Public Policy, 12(3), 243-256.
106. Stone, D. A. (1989). Causal stories and the formation of policy agendas. Political Science Quarterly, 104(2), 281-300.
107. Throgmorton, J. A. (1991). The rhetorics of policy analysis. Policy Sciences, 24, 153-179.
108. Torgerson, D. (1986). Between knowledge and politics: Three faces of policy analysis. Policy Sciences, 19(1), 33-59.
109. Torgerson, D. (1996). Power and insight in policy discourse: Post-positivism and policy discourse. In L. Dobuzinskis, M. Howlett, & D. Laycock (Eds.), Policy studies in Canada: The state of the art (pp. 266-298). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
110. Tufte, E. R. (1978). Political control of the economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
111. Uusitalo, H. (1984). Comparative research on the determinants of the welfare state: The state of the art. European Journal of Political Research, 12, 403-422.
112. Van Waarden, F. (1992). Dimensions and types of policy networks. European Journal of Political Research, 21, 29-52.
113. von Beyme, K. (1984). Do parties matter?: The impact of parties on the key decisions in the political system. Government and Opposition, 19, 5-29.
114. Weimer, D. L. (1998). Policy analysis and evidence: A craft perspective. Policy Studies Journal, 26(1), 114-128.
115. Weir, M. (1992). Ideas and the politics of bounded innovation. In S. Steinmo, K. Thelen, & F. Longstreth (Eds.), Structuring politics: Historical institutionalism in comparative analysis (pp. 188-216). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
116. Wilensky, H. L. (1975). The welfare state and equality: Structural and ideological roots of public expenditures. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
117. Wilks, S., & Wright, M. (1987). Conclusion: Comparing government-industry relations: States, sectors, and networks. In S. Wilks & M. Wright (Eds.), Comparative government-industry relations: Western Europe, the United States, and Japan (pp. 274-313). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
118. Williams, A. P., Vayda, E., Cohen, M. L., Woodward, C. A, & Ferries, B. M. (1995). Medicine and the Canadian state: From the politics of conflict to the politics of accommodation. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 36, 303-321.
119. Wilson, J. (1987/88). Forest conservation in British Columbia 1935-85: Reflections on a barren political debate. BC Studies, 76, 3-32.
120. Woodiwiss, A. (1990). Social theory after postmodernism: Rethinking production, law and class. London: Pluto Press.
121. Zahariadis, N., & Allen, C. S. (1995). Ideas, networks and policy streams: Privatization in Britain and Germany. Policy Studies Review, 14 (1/2), 71-98.