Word naming and memory load: Still searching for an individual differences explanation

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 803-821

  Pexman, Penny M ^a   Lupker, Stephen J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032382203     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.24.4.803     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Andrews, S. (1982). Phonological recoding: Is the regularity effect consistent? Memory & Cognition, 10, 565-575.
2. Baron, J., & Strawson, C. (1976). Use of orthographic and word-specific knowledge in reading words aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 386-393.
3. Becker, C. A. (1976). Allocation of attention during visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 556-566.
4. Bernstein, S. E., & Carr, T. H. (1996). Dual-route theories of spelling to pronunciation: What can be learned from concurrent task performance? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 86-116.
5. Brown, P., & Besner, D. (1987). The assembly of phonology in oral reading: A new model. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 471-490). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Brown, P., Lupker, S. J., & Colombo, L. (1994). Interacting sources of information in word naming: A study of individual differences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 537-554.
7. Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Strategies of information processing (pp. 151-216). New York: Academic Press.
8. Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589-608.
9. Content, A. (1991). The effect of spelling-to-sound regularity on naming in French. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 53, 3-12.
10. Forster, K. I., & Chambers, S. M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 627-635.
11. Herdman, C. M. (1992). Attentional resource demands of visual word recognition in naming and lexical decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 460-470.
12. Herdman, C. M., & Beckett, B. (1996). Code-specific processes in word naming: Evidence supporting a dual-route model of word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1149-1165.
13. Herdman, C. M., Beckett, B., & Stolpmann, K. (1993, July). Code-specific interference in phonological recoding: Evidence supporting a dual-route approach. Paper presented at the meeting of the Canadian Society for Brain, Behaviour, and Cognitive Science, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
14. Herdman, C. M., & Dobbs, A. R. (1989). Attentional demands of visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 124-132.
15. Jared, D. (1995, November). Spelling-sound consistency affects the naming of high-frequency words. Poster presented at the 36th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Los Angeles, CA.
16. Kučera, H., & Francis, W. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
17. Lupker, S. J., Brown, P., & Colombo, L. (1997). Strategic control in a naming task: Changing routes or changing deadlines? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 570-590.
18. Monsell, S., Patterson, K. E., Graham, A., Hughes, C. H., & Milroy, R. (1992). Lexical and sublexical translation of spelling to sound: Strategic anticipation of lexical status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 452-467.
19. Paap, K. R., & Herdman, C. M. (1998). Highly skilled participants and failures to redirect attention: Two plausible reasons for failing to replicate Paap and Noel's effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 845-861.
20. Paap, K. R., & Noel, R. W. (1991). Dual-route models of print to sound: Still a good horse race. Psychological Research/ Psychologische Forschung, 53, 13-24.
21. Pexman, P. M., & Lupker, S. J. (1995). Effects of memory load in a word naming task: Five failures to replicate. Memory & Cognition, 23, 581-595.
22. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
23. Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
24. Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Barnes, M. A., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1984). When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 383-104.
25. Taraban, R., & McClelland, J. L. (1987). Conspiracy effects in word pronunciation. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 608-631.
26. Van Orden, G. C., Pennington, B. F., & Stone, G. O. (1990). Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. Psychological Review, 97, 488-522.