Code-Specific Processes in Word Naming: Evidence Supporting a Dual-Route Model of Word Recognition

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 1149-1165

  Herdman, Chris M ^a   Beckett, Brian L ^a  

^a CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030493587     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.22.5.1149     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Andrews, S. (1992). Phonological receding: Is the regularity effect consistent? Memory & Cognition, 10, 565-575.
2. Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
3. Baluch, B., & Besner, D. (1991). Visual word recognition: Evidence for strategic control of lexical and nonlexical routines in oral reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 644-652.
4. Becker, C. A. (1976). Allocation of attention during visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 556-566.
5. Becker, C. A., & Killion, T. H. (1977). Interaction of visual and cognitive effects in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 389-401.
6. Bernstein, S. E., & Carr, T. H. (1996). Dual-route theories of pronouncing printed words: What can be learned from concurrent task performance? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 86-116.
7. Carr, T. H., & Pollatsek, A. (1985). Recognizing printed words: A look at current models. In D. Besner, T. G. Waller, & G. E. MacKinnon, (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice, (Vol. 5, pp. 1-82). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
8. Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Strategies of information processing. New York: Academic Press.
9. Coltheart, M. (1985). Cognitive neuropsychology. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 3-37). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589-608.
11. de Jong, M., & Herdman, C. M. (1992, June). Attentional demands of lexical access during reading. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Society for Brain, Behaviour, and Cognitive Science, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
12. Hellige, J. B., Cox, P. J., & Litvak, L. (1979). Information processing in the cerebral hemispheres: Selective hemispheric activation and capacity limitations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 251-279.
13. Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (1990). The effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 417-429.
14. Herdman, C. M. (1992). Attentional resource demands of visual word recognition in naming and lexical decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 460-470.
15. Herdman, C. M., & Dobbs, A. R. (1989). Attentional demands of visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 124-132.
16. Herdman, C. M., & LeFevre, J. (1992). Individual differences in the efficiency of word recognition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 95-102.
17. Herdman, C. M., & LeFevre, J., & Greenham, S. L. (1994). Implicating the lexicon: Base-word frequency effects in pseudohomophone naming. Journal of Experimental: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 575-590.
18. Inhoff, A. W., Topolski, R., Vitu, F., & O'Regan, J. K. (1993). Attention demands during reading and the occurrence of brief (express) fixations. Perception & Psychophysics, 54, 814-823.
19. Jared, D. (1995). Evidence that strategy effects in word naming reflect changes in output timing rather than changes in processing route. Manuscript submitted for publication.
20. Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
21. Kellas, G., Ferraro, F. R., & Simpson, G. B. (1988). Lexical ambiguity and the timecourse of attentional allocation in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 601-609.
22. Kulak, A. G., & LeFevre, J. (1993, July). The effect of visuospatial processing demands on arithmetic solution strategies. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Society for Brain, Behaviour, and Cognitive Science, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
23. Kucera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
24. Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. (1993). Similar attentional, frequency, and associative effects for pseudohomophones and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 166-178.
25. Monsell, S., Patterson, K. E., Graham, A., Hughes, C. H., & Milroy, R. (1992). Lexical and sublexical translation of spelling to sound: Strategic anticipation of lexical status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 452-467.
26. Navon, D., & Gopher, D. (1979). On the economy of the human information-processing system. Psychological Review, 86, 214-255.
27. Paap, K. R., & Johansen, L. S. (1994). The case of the vanishing frequency effect: A retest of the verification model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1129-1157.
28. Paap, K. R., McDonald, J. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W., & Noel, R. W. (1987). Frequency and pronounceability in visually presented naming and lexical decision tasks. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 221-443). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Paap, K. R., Newsome, S. L., McDonald, J. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1982). An activation-verification model for letter and word recognition: The word-superiority effect. Psychological Review, 89, 275-280.
30. Paap, K. R., & Noel, R. W. (1991). Dual-route models of print to sound: Still a good horse race. Psychological Research, 53, 13-24.
31. Paap, K. R., & Ogden, W. C. (1981). Letter encoding is an obligatory but capacity demanding operation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 518-527.
32. Patterson, K. E., & Coltheart, V. (1987). Phonological processes in reading: A tutorial review. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 421-448). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Pexman, P. M., & Lupker, S. J. (1995). Effect of memory in a word naming task: Five failures to replicate. Memory & Cognition, 23, 581-595.
34. Pugh, K. R., Rexer, K., & Katz, L. (1994). Evidence of flexible coding in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 807-825.
35. Rayner, K., & Duffy, S. A. (1986). Lexical complexity and fixations times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory & Cognition, 14, 191-201.
36. Reinitz, M. T. (1990). Effects of spatially directed attention on visual encoding. Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 497-505.
37. Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Barnes, M. A., & Tannenhaus, M. K. (1984). When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 383-404.
38. Sotozaki, H., Campsall, J., & Herdman, C. M. (1993, July). Phonological recoding in Japanese. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Society for Brain, Behaviour, and Cognitive Science, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
39. Stelmach, L. B., & Herdman, C. M. (1991). Directed attention and perception of temporal order. Journal of Experimental: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 539-550.
40. Stelmach, L. B., Herdman, C. M., & McNeil, K. R. (1994). Attentional modulation of visual processes in motion perception. Journal of Experimental: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 108-121.
41. Taraban, R., & McClelland, J. L. (1987). Conspiracy effects in word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 608-631.
42. Venezky, R. L. (1970). The structure of English language. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.
43. Wickens, C. D. (1980). The structure of attentional resources. In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention and performance VIII, (pp. 239-258). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.