Development of a sensory texture profile of cooked potatoes by multivariate data analysis

Journal of Texture Studies

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 453-468

  Thybo, Anette Kistrup ^a   Martens, Magni ^b  

^a DANISH INSTITUTE OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SOLANUM TUBEROSUM; TUBEROSUM;

EID: 0032257532     PISSN: 00224901     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-4603.1998.tb00816.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. BÖHLER, G., ESCHER, F. and SOLMS, J. 1986. Evaluation of cooking quality of potatoes using sensory and instrumental methods. 1. Sensory evaluation. Lebensm.-Wiss. U. Technol. 19, 338-343.
2. BRANDT, M.A., SKINNER, E.Z. and COLEMANN, J.A. 1963. Texture profile method. J. Food Sci. 28, 404-409.
3. CAMO A/S. 1996. Unscrambler 6.0. Trondheim. Norge.
4. ISO (International Organization for Standardization). 1992. ISO 5492. Sensory Analysis-Vocabulary.
5. LEUNG, H.K., BARRON, F.H. and DAVIS, D.C. 1983. Textural and rheological properties of cooked potatoes. J. Food Sci. 48, 1470-1474, 1496.
6. LUNDGREN, B., KARLSTRÖM, B. and LJUNGQVIST, A. 1979. Effect of time and temperature of storage after cooking on the sensory quality of bintje potatoes. J. Sci. Food Agric. 30, 305-318.
7. LYON, B.G. 1980. Sensory profiling of canned boned chicken: Sensory evaluation procedures and data analysis. J. Food Sci. 45, 1341-1346.
8. MARTENS, M. and MARTENS, H. 1986. Partial least square regression. In Statistical Procedures in Food Research, (J.R. Piggott, ed.) pp. 293-359. Elsevier Appl. Sci., Publ., London.
9. McCOMBER, D.R., HORNER, H.T., CHAMBERLIN, M.A. and COX, D.F. 1994. Potato cultivar differences associated with mealiness. J. Agric. Food Chem. 42, 2433-2439.
10. MEILGAARD, M., CIVILLE, G.V. and CARR, B.T. 1991. Sensory Evaluation Techniques, 2nd Ed., Chap. 2, 9, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
11. MUÑOZ, A.M. 1986. Development and application of texture reference scales. J. Sensory Studies 1, 55-83.
12. NÆS, T. and SOLHEIM, R. 1991. Detection and interpretation of variation within and between assessors in sensory profiling. J. Sensory Studies 6, 159-177.
13. NORONHA, R.L., DAMÁSIO, M.H., PIVATTO, M.M. and NEGRILLO, B.G. 1995. Development of the attributes and panel screening for texture descriptive analysis of milk gels aided by multivariate statistical procedures. Food Qual. Pref. 6, 49-54.
14. ONAYEMI, O., BABALOLA, R.O. and BADANGA, A. 1987. Textural properties of cooked tropical yam (dioscorea spp.). J. Texture Studies 18, 17-29.
15. SAS. 1996. Vers 6.10, SAS Institute, Cary, N.C.
16. SINESIO, F., RISVIK, E. and RØDBOTTEN, M. 1990. Evaluation of panelist performance in descriptive profiling of rancid sausages: A multivariate study. J. Sensory Studies 5, 33-52.
17. STONE, H., SIDEL, J., OLIVER, S., WOOLSEY, A. and SINGLETON, R.C. 1974. Sensory evaluation by quantitative descriptive analysis. Food Technol. 28 (11), 24, 26, 28-29, 32, 34.
18. SZCZESNIAK, A.S. 1963. Classification of textural characteristics. J. Food Sci. 28, 385-389.
19. SZCZESNIAK, A.S., BRANDT, M.A. and FRIEDMAN, H.H. 1963. Development of standard rating scales for mechanical parameters of texture and correlation between the objective and the sensory methods of texture evaluation. J. Food Sci. 28, 397-403.
20. TRUONG, V.D., WALTER, W.M. and HAMANN, D.D. 1997. Relationship between instrumental and sensory parameters of cooked sweet potato texture. J. Texture Studies 28, 163-185.
21. VAN MARLE, J.T., VAN DER VUURST DE VRIES, R., WILKINSON, E.C. and YUKSEL, D. 1997. Sensory evaluation of the texture of steam-cooked table potatoes. Pot. Research 40, 79-90.
22. VILLAREAL, R.L., TSOU, S.C., LAI, S.H. and CHIU, S.L. 1979. Selection criteria for eating quality in steamed sweet potato roots. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 104, 31-33.
23. WOLTERS, C.J. and ALLCHURCH, E.M. 1994. Effect of training procedure on the performance of descriptive panels. Food Qual. and Pref. 5, 203-214.
24. WOODMAN, J.S. and WARREN, D.S. 1972. Texture of canned potatoes: Use of new objective methods to separate the attributes of mouthfeel and breakdown. J. Sci. Food Agric. 23, 1067-1077.