What Is Learned during Automatization? II. Obligatory Encoding of Spatial Location

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 24, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 1720-1736

  Logan, Gordon D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOMATISM; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME;

AUTOMATISM; HUMANS; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 0032246767     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.24.6.1720     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Acredolo, L. P., Pick, H. H., Jr., & Olsen, M. G. (1975). Environmental differentiation and familiarity as determinants of children's memory for spatial location. Developmental Psychology, 11, 495-501.
2. Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 340-357.
3. Baraslou, L. W. (1990). On the indistinguishability of exemplar memory and abstraction in category representation. In T. K. Srull & R. S. Wyer (Eds.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 3, pp. 61-88). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Barsalou, L. W. (1995). Storage side effects: Studying processing to understand learning. In A. Ram & D. Leake (Eds.), Goal-driven learning (pp. 407-419). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Bashinski, H. S., & Bacharach, V. R. (1980). Enhancement of perceptual sensitivity as the result of selectively attending to spatial locations. Perception & Psychophysics, 28, 241-248.
6. Battig, W. F., & Montague, W. E. (1969). Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 80, 1-46.
7. Boronat, C. B., & Logan, G. D. (1997). The role of attention in automatization: Does attention operate at encoding, or retrieval, or both? Memory & Cognition, 25, 36-46.
8. Brown, T. L., Roos-Gilbert, L., & Carr, T. H. (1995). Automaticity and word perception: Evidence from Stroop and Stroop dilution effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1395-1411.
9. Bundesen, C. (1990). A theory of visual attention. Psychological Review, 97, 523-547.
10. Carr, T. H. (1992). Automaticity and cognitive anatomy: Is word recognition "automatic?" American Journal of Psychology 105, 201-237.
11. Carrier, M., Pashler, H., & McFarland, K. (1994). Attention and implicit memory storage. Presented at the 35th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis, Missouri, November 1994.
12. Craik, F. I. M., Govoni, R., Naveh-Benjamin, M., & Anderson, N. D. (1996). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 159-180.
13. Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433-458.
14. Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1965). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
15. Green, M. (1991). Visual search, visual streams, and visual architectures. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 388-403.
16. Greene, R. L. (1984). Incidental learning of event frequency. Memory & Cognition, 12, 90-95.
17. Greene, R. L. (1986). Effects of intentionality and strategy on memory for frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 489-495.
18. Grossberg, S., Mingolla, E., & Ross, W. D. (1994). A neural theory of attentive visual search: Interactions of boundary, surface, spatial, and object representations. Psychological Review, 101, 470-489.
19. Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1979). Automatic and effortful processes in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 356-388.
20. Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1984). Automatic processing of fundamental information: The case of frequency of occurrence. American Psychologist, 39, 1372-1388.
21. Hintzman, D. L. (1990). Human learning and memory: Connections and dissociations. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 109-139.
22. Hollender, D. (1986). Semantic activation without conscious identification in dichotic listening, parafoveal vision, and visual masking. Brain and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1-23.
23. Humphreys, G. W., & Müller, H. J. (1993). Search by Recursive Rejection (SERR): A connectionist model of visual search. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 43-110.
24. Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541.
25. Jacoby, L. L., Woloshyn, V., & Kelley, C. (1989). Becoming famous without being recognized: Unconscious influences of memory produced by dividing attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 115-125.
26. Kahneman, D., & Treisman, A. (1984). Changing views of attention and automaticity. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 29-61). New York: Academic Press.
27. Kučera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
28. LaBerge, D., & Brown, V. (1989). Theory of attentional operations in shape identification. Psychological Review, 96, 101-124.
29. Lassaline, M. L., & Logan, G. D. (1993). Memory-based automaticity in the discrimination of visual numerosity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 561-581.
30. Lockhart, R., & Murdock, B. B. (1970). Memory and the theory of signal detection. Psychological Bulletin, 74, 100-109.
31. Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492-527.
32. Logan, G. D. (1990). Repetition priming and automaticity: Common underlying mechanisms? Cognitive Psychology, 22, 1-35.
33. Logan, G. D. (1992). Shapes of reaction time distributions and shapes of learning curves: A test of the instance theory of automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 883-914.
34. Logan, G. D. (1996). The CODE theory of visual attention: An integration of space-based and object-based attention. Psychological Review, 103, 603-649.
35. Logan, G. D., & Bundesen, C. (1996). Spatial effects in the partial report paradigm: A challenge for theories of visual spatial attention. In D. L. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 35, pp. 243-282). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
36. Logan, G. D., & Etherton, J. L. (1994). What is learned during automatization? The role of attention in constructing an instance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1022-1050.
37. Logan, G. D., & Klapp, S. T. (1991). Automatizing alphabet arithmetic: I. Is extended practice necessary to produce automaticity? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 179-195.
38. Logan, G. D., & Taylor, S. E., & Etherton, J. L. (1996). Attention in the acquisition and expression of automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22, 620-638.
39. Logan, G. D., Taylor, S. E., & Etherton, J. L. (in press). Attention and automaticity: Toward a theoretical integration. Psychological Research.
40. Mandler, J. M., Seegmiller, D., & Day, J. (1977). On the coding of spatial information. Memory & Cognition, 5, 10-16.
41. Mayall, K., & Humphreys, G. W. (1996). Case mixing and the task-sensitive disruption of lexical processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 278-294.
42. McCann, R. S., Folk, C. L., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). The role of spatial attention in visual word processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1015-1029.
43. McCormack, P. D. (1982). Coding of spatial information by young and elderly adults. Journal of Gerontology, 37, 80-86.
44. Mewhort, D. J. K., Campbell, A. J., Marchetti, F. M., & Campbell, J. I. D. (1981). Identification, localization, and "iconic memory": An evaluation of the bar probe task. Memory & Cognition, 9, 50-67.
45. Miller, J. (1988). Components of the location probability effect in visual search tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 453-471.
46. Monheit, M. A., & Johnston, J. C. (1994). Spatial attention to arrays of multidimensional objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 691-708.
47. Monsell, S., Doyle, M. C., & Haggard, P. N. (1989). The effects of frequency upon visual word recognition: Where are they? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 43-71.
48. Mozer, M. C. (1991). The perception of multiple objects: A connectionist approach. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.
49. Mueller, C. W., & Watkins, M. J. (1977). Inhibition from part-set cuing: A cue-overload interpretation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 699-709.
50. Naveh-Benjamin, M. (1987). Coding of spatial location information: An automatic process? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 595-605.
51. Naveh-Benjamin, M. (1988). Recognition memory of spatial location information: Another failure to support automaticity. Memory & Cognition, 16, 437-445.
52. Naveh-Benjamin, M., & Jonides, J. (1986). On the automaticity of frequency coding: Effects of competing task load, encoding strategy, and intention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 378-386.
53. Newell, A., & Rosenbloom, P. S. (1981). Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. In J. R. Anderson (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition (pp. 1-55). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
54. Nissen, M. J. (1985). Accessing features and objects: Is location special? In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and Performance XI (pp. 205-219). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
55. Nosofsky, R. M., & Palmeri, T. J. (1997). An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification. Psychological Review, 104, 266-300.
56. Palmeri, T. J. (1997). Exemplar similarity and the development of automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 324-354.
57. Park, D. C., Puglisi, J. T., & Lutz, R. (1982). Spatial memory in older adults: Effects of intentionality. Journal of Gerontology, 37, 330-335.
58. Parkin, A. J., Reid, T. K., & Russo, R. (1990). On the differential nature of implicit and explicit memory. Memory & Cognition, 18, 507-514.
59. Phaf, R. H., van der Heijden, A. H. C., & Hudson, P. T. W. (1990). SLAM: A connectionist model for attention in visual selection tasks. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 273-341.
60. Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R. R., & Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 160-174.
61. Roediger, H. L. III (1990). Implicit memory: Retention without remembering. American Psychologist, 45, 1043-1056.
62. Schneider, W. (1985). Toward a model of attention and the development of automatic processing. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 475-492). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
63. Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127-190.
64. Sperling, G., & Weichselgartner, E. (1995). Episodic theory of the dynamics of spatial attention. Psychological Review, 102, 503-532.
65. Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
66. Treisman, A., & Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review, 95, 14-48.
67. Treisman, A., Vieira, A., & Hayes, A. (1992). Automaticity and preattentive processing. American Journal of Psychology, 105, 341-362.
68. Uyeda, K. M., & Mandler, G. (1980). Prototypicality norms for 28 semantic categories. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 12, 587-595.
69. van der Heijden, A. H. C. (1992). Selective attention in vision. London: Routledge.
70. van der Velde, F., & van der Heijden, A. H. C. (1997). On the statistical independence of color and shape in object identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1798-1812.
71. von Wright, J. M. (1968). Selection in visual immediate memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 62-68.
72. von Wright, J. M. (1970). On selection in immediate memory. Acta Psychologica, 33, 280-292.
73. von Wright, J. M., Gebhard, P., & Karttunen, M. (1975). A developmental study of the recall of spatial location. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 20, 181-190.
74. Watkins, M. J. (1979). Engrams as cuegrams and forgetting as cue overload: A cuing approach to the structure of memory. In C. R. Puff (Ed.), Memory organization and structure (pp. 347-372). New York: Academic.
75. Watkins, M. J., & Watkins, O. C. (1976). Cue-overload theory and the method of interpolated attributes. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 7, 289-291.
76. Watkins, O. C., & Watkins, M. J. (1975). Buildup of proactive inhibition as a cue-overload effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1, 442-452.
77. Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 202-238.
78. Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., & Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 419-433.
79. Zbrodoff, N. J. (1995). Why is 9 + 7 harder than 2 + 3? Strength and interference as explanations of the problem-size effect. Memory & Cognition, 23, 689-700.
80. Zechmeister, E. B., McKillip, J., Pasko, S., & Bespalec, D. (1975). Visual memory for place on the page. Journal of General Psychology, 92, 43-52.