From particle hopping models to traffic flow theory

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1644, 1998, Pages 1-9

  Nagel, Kai ^a  

^a LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MATHEMATICAL MODELS; THEOREM PROVING;

LIGHTHILL-WHITHAM THEORY; PARTICLE HOPPING MODELS; TRAFFIC FLOW THEORY;

TRAFFIC CONTROL;

EID: 0032207768     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/1644-01     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Wolfram, S. Theory and Applications of Cellular Automata. World Scientific, Singapore, 1986.
2. Wolf, D. E., M. Schreckenberg, and A. Bachern, eds. Traffic and Granular Flow. World Scientific, Singapore, 1996.
3. Wolf, D. E., and M. Schreckenberg, eds. Traffic and Granular Flow II. Springer, Heidelberg, 1998.
4. Chang, G. L., H. S. Mahmassani, and R. Herman. Macroparticle Traffic Simulation Model to Investigate Peak-Period Commuter Decision Dynamics. In Transportation Research Record 1005, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1985, pp. 107-120.
5. Herman, R., and I. Prigogine. A Two-Fluid Approach to Town Traffic. Science, Vol. 204, 1979, pp. 148-151.
6. Nagel, K. Particle Hopping Models and Traffic Flow Theory. Physical Review E, Vol. 53, No. 5, 1996, p. 4655.
7. May, A. D. Traffic Flow Fundamentals. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1990.
8. Gerlough, D. L., and M. J. Huber. In Special Report 165: Traffic Flow Theory, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1975.
9. Whitham, G. B. Exact Solutions for a Discrete System Arising in Traffic Flow. Proc., Royal Society of London, Series A, Vol. 428, 1990, pp. 49-69.
10. Bando, M., et al. Dynamical Model of Traffic Congestion and Numerical Simulation. Physical Review E, Vol. 51, No. 2, 1995, p. 1035.
11. Payne, H. J. Models of Freeway Traffic and Control. In Mathematical Models of Public Systems, Vol. 1. Simulation Council, La Jolla, Calif., 1971, p. 51.
12. Kühne, R. D., and R. Beckschulte. Non-Linearity Stochastics of Unstable Traffic Flow (C.F. Daganzo, ed.), Proc., 12th International Symposium on Theory of Traffic Flow and Transportation, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1993, p. 367.
13. Kerner, B. S., and P. Konhäuser. Structure and Parameters of Clusters in Traffic Flow. Physical Review E, Vol. 50, No. 1, 1994, p. 54.
14. Helbing, D. Gas-Kinetic Derivation of Navier-Stokes-Like Traffic Equations. Physical Review E, Vol. 53, No. 3, 1996, pp. 253-282.
15. Lighthill, M. J., and G. B. Whitham. On Kinematic Waves: II. A Theory of Traffic Flow on Long Crowded Roads. Special Report, Highway Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1964.
16. Daganzo, C. F. Requiem for Second-Order Fluid Approximations of Traffic Flow. Transportation Research, Part B, Vol. 29, No. 4, 1995, p. 277.
17. Burgers, J. M. The Nonlinear Diffusion Equation. Riedel, Boston, 1974.
18. Daganzo, C.F. Cell Transmission Model: Dynamic Representation of Highway Traffic Consistent with the Hydrodynamic Theory. Transportation Research, Part B, Vol. 28, No. 4, 1994, pp. 269-277.
19. Treiterer, J. Investigation of Traffic Dynamics by Aerial Photogrammetry Techniques. Technical Report EES-278, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 1975.
20. Spohn, H. Large Scale Dynamics of Interacting Particles. Springer, Berlin, 1991.
21. Krug, J., and H. Spohn. Universality Classes for Deterministic Surface Growth. Physical Review A, Vol. 83, No. 8, 1988, p. 4271.
22. Nagel, K., and H. J. Herrmann. Deterministic Models for Traffic Jams. Physica A, Vol. 199, 1993, p. 254.
23. Nagel, K., and M. Schreckenberg. A Cellular Automaton Model for Freeway Traffic. Journal de Physique I France, Vol. 2, 1992, p. 2221.
24. Nagel, K., and M. Paczuski. Emergent Traffic Jams. Physical Review E, Vol. 51, 1995, p. 2909.
25. Musha, T., and H. Higuchi. Traffic Current Fluctuation and the Burgers Equation. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 17, No. 5, 1978, pp. 811-816.
26. Nagel, K., and S. Rasmussen. Traffic at the Edge of Chaos. In Artificial Life IV: Proc., 4th International Workshop on the Synthesis and Simulation of Living Systems (R.A. Brooks and P. Maes, eds.), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1994, pp. 222-235.
27. Rickert, M., and K. Nagel. Experiences with a Simplified Microsimulation for the Dallas/Fort Worth Area. International Journal of Modern Physics C, Vol. 8, No. 3, 1997, pp. 483-504.
28. Nagel, K., and A. Schleicher. Microscopic Traffic Modeling on Parallel High Performance Computers. Parallel Computing, Vol. 20, 1994, pp. 125-146.
29. Rickert, M., and P. Wagner. Parallel Real-Time Implementation of Large-Scale, Route-Plan-Driven Traffic Simulation. International Journal of Modern Physics C, Vol. 7, 1996, p. 133.
30. Gerlough, D. L. Simulation of Freeway Traffic by an Electronic Computer. In Proc., 35th Annual Meeting of the Highway Research Board (F. Burggraf and E. M. Ward, eds.), National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1956, p. 543.
31. Cremer, M., and J. Ludwig. A Fast Simulation Model for Traffic Flow on the Basis of Boolean Operations. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, Vol. 28, 1986, pp. 297-303.
32. Schütt, H. Entwicklung und Erprobung eines sehr schnellen, bitorientierten Verkehrssimulationssystems für Strassennetze. Schriftenreihe Heft 6, AG Automatisierungstechnik TU Hamburg-Harburg, Hamburg-Harburg, Germany, 1991.
33. Krauss, S., P. Wagner, and C. Gawron. Metastable States in a Microscopic Model of Traffic. Physical Review E, Vol. 55, No. 5, 1997, pp. 5597-5602.
34. Treiterer, J., and J. A. Myers. The Hysteresis Phenomenon in Traffic Flow. In Proc., 6th ISTT (D. J. Buckley, ed.), A. H. and A. W. Reed Pty Ltd., Artarmon, New South Wales, 1974, p. 13.
35. Krauss, S. Microscopic Modeling of Traffic Flow: Investigation of Collision Free Vehicle Dynamics. PhD dissertation. Cologne, Germany, 1997.
36. Van Aerde, M., et al. INTEGRATION: An Overview of Current Simulation Features. Presented at 75th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1996.
37. Sasvari, M., and J. Kertesz. Cellular Automata Models of Single Lane Traffic. Physical Review E, Vol. 56, No. 4, 1997, pp. 4104-4110.
38. Eisenblätter, B., et al. Jamming Transition in a Cellular Automaton Model for Traffic Flow. Physical Review E, Vol. 57, No. 2a, 1998, pp. 1309-1314.
39. Nagel, K., D. E. Wolf, P. Wagner, and P. M. Simon. Two-Lane Traffic Rules for Cellular Automata: A Systematic Approach. Physical Review E, Vol. 58, No. 2, 1998, pp. 1425-1437.
40. Nagel, K., et al. TRANSIMS Traffic Flow Characteristics. Los Alamos Unclassified Report (LA-UR) 97-3530, Los Alamos National Laboratory, 1997. Los Alamos National Laboratory, TSA-DO/SA Mail Stop M997, Los Alamos, NM 87545. 〈http://www-transims.tsasa. lanl.gov/research_team/〉
41. Barlovic, R., L. Santen, A. Schadschneider, and M. Schreckenberg. Metastable States in Cellular Automata. European Physical Journal B, Vol. 5, No. 3, 1998, pp. 793-800.