Opening Plenary Session: 1997. Current Status and Future Trends in Abdominal CT

Radiographics

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 1555-1568

  Federle, Michael P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Abdomen, CT, 70.12115, 80.12115; Computed tomography (CT), technology, 70.12115, 70.12117, 80.12115, 80.12117; Computed tomography (CT), utilization

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL RADIOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; REVIEW;

HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOGRAPHY, ABDOMINAL; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 0032197106     PISSN: 02715333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.18.6.9821199     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Zeman RK, Fox SH, Silverman PM, et al. Heli-cal (spiral) CT of the abdomen. AJR 1993; 160: 719-725.
2. Heiken JP, Brink JA, Vannier MW. Spiral (helical) CT. Radiology 1993; 189:647-656.
3. Zeman RK, Zeiberg AS, Davros WJ, et al. Routine helical CT of the abdomen: image quality considerations. Radiology 1993; 189:395-400.
4. Urban BA, Fishman EK, Kuhlman JE, Kawashima A, Hennessey JG, Siegelman SS. Detection of focal hepatic lesions with spiral CT: comparison of 4-and 8-mm interscan spacing. AJR 1993; 160:783-785.
5. Costello P, Dupuy DE, Ecker CP, Tello R. Spiral CT of the thorax with reduced volume of contrast material: a comparative study. Radiology 1992; 183:663-666.
6. Brink JA, Heiken JP, Forman HP, Sagel SS, Molina PL, Brown PC. Hepatic spiral CT: reduction of dose of intravenous contrast material. Radiology 1995; 197:83-88.
7. U.S. imaging marketing guide. Malvern, Pa: AMR, 1992-1997.
8. Smith RC, Verga M, McCarthy S, Rosenfield AT. Diagnosis of acute flank pain: value of unenhanced helical CT. AJR 1996; 166:97-101.
9. Balthazar EJ, Birnbaum BA, Yee J, Megibow AJ, Roshkow J, Gray C. Acute appendicitis: CT and US correlation in 100 patients. Radiology 1994; 190:31-35.
10. Lane MJ, Katz DS, Ross BA, Clautice-Engle TL, Mindelzun RE, Jeffrey RB Jr. Unenhanced helical CT for suspected acute appendicitis. AJR 1997; 168:405-409.
11. Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, et al. Helical CT for the diagnosis of appendicitis: prospective evaluation of a focused appendix CT examination. Radiology 1997; 202:139-144.
12. Frager DH, Baer JW, Rothpearl A, Bossart PA. Distinction between postoperative ileus and mechanical small-bowel obstruction: value of CT compared with clinical and other radiographic findings. AJR 1995; 164:891-894.
13. Siewert B, Raptopoulos V, Mueller MF, Rosen MP, Steer M. Impact of CT on diagnosis and management of acute abdomen in patients initially treated without surgery. AJR 1997; 168: 173-178.
14. Levine JA, Neitlich J, Verga M, Dalrymple N, Smith RC. Ureteral calculi in patients with flank pain: correlation of plain radiography with unenhanced helical CT. Radiology 1997; 204:27-31.
15. Fielding JR, Steele G, Fox LA, Heller H, Loughlin KR. Spiral computerized tomography in the evaluation of acute flank pain: a replacement for excretory urography. J Urol 1997; 157:2071-2073.
16. Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, Mostafavi AA, McCabe CJ. Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources. N Engl J Med 1998; 338: 141-146.
17. Maglinte DDT, Balthazar JE, Kelvin FM, Megibow AJ. The role of radiology in the diagnosis of small-bowel obstruction. AJR 1997; 168:1171-1180.
18. Smith RC, Verga M, Dalrymple N, McCarthy S, Rosenfield AT. Acute ureteral obstruction: value of secondary signs of helical unenhanced CT. AJR 1996; 167:1109-1113.
19. Naik KS, Ness LM, Bowker AM, Robinson PJ. Is computed tomography of the body overused: an audit of 2068 attendances in a large acute hospital. Br J Radiol 1996; 69:126-131.
20. Navarrete-Navarro P, Vazquez G, Bosch JM, Fernandez E, Rivera R, Carazo E. Computed tomography vs clinical and multidisciplinary procedures for early evaluation of severe abdomen and chest trauma: a cost analysis approach. Intensive Care Med 1996; 22:208-212.
21. Seibel RM. Image-guided minimally invasive therapy. Surg Endosc 1997; 11:154-162.
22. Federle MP, Courcoulas AP, Powell M, Ferris JV, Peitzman AB. Blunt splenic injury in adults: clinical and CT criteria for management, with emphasis on active extravasation. Radiology 1998; 206:137-142.
23. Boone DC, Federle M, Billiar TR, Udekwu AO, Peitzman AB. Evolution of management of major hepatic trauma: identification of patterns of injury. J Trauma 1995; 39:344-350.
24. Raptopoulos V. Abdominal trauma: emphasis on computed tomography, Radiol Clin North Am 1994; 32:969-987.
25. Shuman WP. CT of blunt abdominal trauma in adults. Radiology 1997; 205:297-305.
26. Beard DV, Hemminger BM, Perry JR, et al. Interpretation of CT studies: single-screen workstation versus film alternator. Radiology 1993; 187:565-569.
27. Nishihara E, Kura H, Kubota G, et al. Control method for preloading with priority information in an integrated radiology information system/picture archiving and communication system. J Digit Imaging 1997; 10:27-31.
28. Mathie AG, Strickland NH. Interpretation of CT scans with PACS image display in stack mode. Radiology 1997; 203:207-209.
29. Ratib O, Ligier Y, Mascarini C, et al. Multimedia image and data navigation workstation. RadioGraphics 1997; 17:515-521.
30. Berbaum KS, Franken EA, Honda H, McGuire C, Weis RR, Barloon T. Evaluation of a PACS workstation for assessment of body CT studies. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1990; 14:853-858.
31. Cikrit DF, Harris VJ, Hemmer CG, et al. Comparison of spiral CT scan and arteriography for evaluation of renal and visceral arteries. Ann Vase Surg 1996; 10:109-116.
32. Cochran ST, Krasny RM, Danovitch GM, et al. Helical CT angiography for examination of living renal donors. AJR 1997; 168:1569-1573.
33. Rubin GD, Alfrey EJ, Dake MD, et al. Assessment of living renal donors with spiral CT. Radiology 1995; 195:457-462.
34. Platt JF, Ellis JH, Korobkin M, Reige KA, Konnak JW, Leichtman AB. Potential renal donors: comparison of conventional imaging with helical CT. Radiology 1996; 198:419-423.
35. Galanski M, Prokop M, Chavan A, Schaefer CM, Jandeleit K, Nischelsky JE. Renal arterial stenoses: spiral CT angiography. Radiology 1993; 189:185-192.
36. Winter TC III, Freeny PC, Nghiem HV, et al. Hepatic arterial anatomy in transplantation candidates: evaluation with three-dimensional CT arteriography. Radiology 1995; 195:363-370.
37. Beregi JP, Elkohen M, Deklunder G, Artaud D, Coullet JM, Wattinne L. Helical CT angiography compared with arteriography in the detection of renal artery stenosis. AJR 1996; 167:495-501.
38. Winter TC III, Nghiem HV, Freeny PC, Hommeyer SC, Mack LA. Hepatic arterial anatomy: demonstration of normal supply and vascular variants with three-dimensional CT angiography. RadioGraphics 1995; 15:771-780.
39. Johnson PT, Heath DG, Kuszyk BS, Fishman EK. CT angiography with volume rendering: advantages and applications in splanchnic vascular imaging. Radiology 1996; 200:564-568.
40. Hopper KD, Kasales CJ, Eggli KD, et al. The impact of 2D versus 3D quantitation of tumor bulk determination on current methods of assessing response to treatment. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1996; 20:930-937.
41. Johnson PT, Heath DG, Bliss DF, et al. Three dimensional CT: real-time interactive volume rendering. AJR 1996; 167:581-588.
42. Katada K, Kato R, Anno H, et al. Guidance with real-time CT fluoroscopy: early clinical experience. Radiology 1996; 200:851-856.
43. Costello P, Gaa J. Clinical assessment of an interventional CT table. Radiology 1993; 189: 284-285.
44. Koral KF, Zasadny KR, Kessler ML, et al. CT-SPECT fusion plus conjugate views for determining dosimetry in iodine-131-monoclonal antibody therapy of lymphoma patients. J Nucl Med 1994; 35:1714-1720.
45. Baron MG. Significance of coronary artery calcification (editorial). Radiology 1994; 192:613-614.
46. Teigen CL, Maus TP, Sheedy PF II, et al. Pulmonary embolism: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced electron-beam CT and comparison with pulmonary angiography. Radiology 1995; 194: 313-318.
47. Silverman PM, Kohan L, Ducic I, et al. Imaging of the liver with helical CT: a survey of scanning techniques. AJR 1998; 170:149-152.
48. Oliver JH III, Baron RL. Helical biphasic contrast-enhanced CT of the liver: technique, indications, interpretation, and pitfalls. Radiology 1996; 201:1-14.
49. Oliver JH III, Baron RL, Federle MP, Rockette HE Jr. Detecting hepatocellular carcinoma: value of unenhanced or arterial phase CT imaging or both used in conjunction with conventional portal venous phase contrast-enhanced CT imaging. AJR 1996; 167:71-77.
50. Van Hoe L, Baert AL, Gryspeerdt S, et al. Dualphase helical CT of the liver: value of an early-phase acquisition in the differential diagnosis of noncystic focal lesions. AJR 1997; 168:1185-1192.
51. Foley WD, Hoffman RG, Quiroz FA, Kahn CE Jr, Perret RS. Hepatic helical CT: contrast material injection protocol. Radiology 1994; 192: 367-371.
52. Bonaldi VM, Bret PM, Reinhold C, Atri M. Helical CT of the liver: value of an early hepatic arterial phase. Radiology 1995; 197:357-363.
53. Ichikawa T, Ohtomo K, Takahashi S. Hepatocellular carcinoma: detection with double-phase helical CT during arterial portography. Radiology 1996; 198:284-287.
54. Kuszyk BS, Bluemke DA, Urban BA, et al. Portal-phase contrast-enhanced helical CT for the detection of malignant hepatic tumors: sensitivity based on comparison with intraoperative and pathologic findings. AJR 1996; 166:91-95.
55. Lu DS, Reber HA, Krasny RM, Kadell BM, Sayre J. Local staging of pancreatic cancer: criteria for unresectability of major vessels as revealed by pancreatic-phase, thin-section helical CT. AJR 1997; 168:1439-1443.
56. Lu DS, Vedantham S, Krasny RM, Kadell B, Berger WL, Reber HA. Two-phase helical CT for pancreatic tumors: pancreatic versus hepatic phase enhancement of tumor, pancreas, and vascular structures. Radiology 1996; 199:697-701.
57. Bonaldi VM, Bret PM, Atri M, Garcia P, Reinhold C. A comparison of two injection protocols using helical and dynamic acquisitions in CT examinations of the pancreas. AJR 1996; 167: 49-55.
58. Bluemke DA, Cameron JL, Hruban RH, et al. Potentially resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: spiral CT assessment with surgical and pathologic correlation. Radiology 1995; 197: 381-385.
59. Van Hoe L, Gryspeerdt S, Marchai G, Baert AL, Mertens L. Helical CT for the preoperative localization of islet cell tumors of the pancreas: value of arterial and parenchymal phase images. AJR 1995; 165:1437-1439.
60. Zeman RK, Cooper C, Zeiberg AS, et al. TNM staging of pancreatic carcinoma using helical CT. AJR 1997; 169:459-464.
61. Zeman RK, Zeiberg A, Hayes WS, Silverman PM, Cooper C, Garra BS. Helical CT of renal masses: the value of delayed scans. AJR 1996; 167:771-776.
62. Szolar DH, Kammerhuber F, Altziebler S, et al. Multiphasic helical CT of the kidney: increased conspicuity for detection and characterization of small (<3-cm) renal masses. Radiology 1997; 202:211-217.
63. Birnbaum BA, Jacobs JE, Ramchandani P. Multiphasic renal CT: comparison of renal mass enhancement during the corticomedullary and nephrographic phases. Radiology 1996; 200: 753-758.
64. Kauczor HU, Schwickert HC, Schweden F, Schild HH, Thelen M. Bolus-enhanced renal spiral CT: technique, diagnostic value, and drawbacks. Eur J Radiol 1994; 18:153-157.
65. Choi BI, Han JK, Cho JM, et al. Characterization of focal hepatic tumors. value of two-phase scanning with spiral computed tomography. Cancer 1995; 76:2434-2442.
66. Leslie DF, Johnson CD, MacCarty RL, Ward EM, Ilstrup DM, Harmsen WS. Single-pass CT of hepatic tumors: value of globular enhancement in distinguishing hemangiomas from hypervascular metastases. AJR 1995; 165:1403-1406.
67. Federle MP, Yagan N, Peitzman AB, Krugh J. Abdominal trauma: use of oral contrast material for CT is safe. Radiology 1997; 205:91-93.
68. Federle MP, Willis LL, Swanson DP. Ionic vs nonionic contrast media: a prospective study of the effect of rapid bolus injection on nausea and anaphylactoid reactions. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1998; 22:341-345.
69. Federle MP, Chang PJ, Confer S, Ozgun B. Extravasation of ionic and nonionic contrast media during rapid bolus infusion body CT: prevalence and sequelae. Radiology 1998; 206:637-640.