Multiphasic renal CT: Comparison of renal mass enhancement during the corticomedullary and nephrographic phases

Radiology

Volumn 200, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 753-758

  Birnbaum, Bernard A ^a   Jacobs, Jill E ^a   Ramchandani, Parvati ^a  

^a HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Computed tomography (CT), technology; Kidney neoplasms, CT; Kidney neoplasms, diagnosis

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; IODINE; MEGLUMINE IOTALAMATE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAVENOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION; KIDNEY CORTEX; KIDNEY CYST; KIDNEY MEDULLA; KIDNEY TUMOR; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RENOGRAPHY; UROGRAPHY;

EID: 0029809735     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.200.3.8756927     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Heiken JP, Brink JA, Vannier MW. Spiral (helical) CT. Radiology 1993; 189:647-656.
2. Zeman RK, Fox SH, Silverman PM, et al. Helical (spiral) CT of the abdomen. AJR 1993; 160:719-725.
3. Hollett MD, Jeffrey RB Jr, Nino-Murcia M, Jorgensen MJ, Harris DP. Dual-phase helical CT of the liver: value of arterial phase scans in the detection of small (<1.5 cm) malignant hepatic neoplasms. AJR 1995; 164:879-884.
4. Baron RL, Oliver JH III, Dodd GD III, Nalesnik M, Holbert BL, Carr B. Hepatocellular carcinoma: evaluation with biphasic, contrast-enhanced, helical CT. Radiology 1996; 199:505-511.
5. Cohan RH, Sherman LS, Korobkin M, Bass JC, Francis IR. Renal masses: assessment of corticomedullary-phase and nephrographic-phase CT scans. Radiology 1995; 196:445-451.
6. Smith RH, Baumgartner BR, Nelson RC, Torres WE. Comparison of arterial phase and excretory phase contrast-enhanced spiral CT of the kidneys for the detection of focal abnormalities. Presented at the 14th annual meeting of the Society of Uroradiology, Palm Beach, Fla, January 14, 1995.
7. Bosniak MA. The current radiological approach to renal cysts. Radiology 1986; 158: 1-10.
8. Bosniak MA. The small (<3.0 cm) renal parenchymal tumor: detection, diagnosis, and controversies. Radiology 1991; 179: 307-317.
9. Smith SJ, Bosniak MA, Megibow AJ, Hulnick DH, Horii SC, Raghavendra BN. Renal cell carcinoma: earlier discovery and increased detection. Radiology 1989; 170: 699-703.
10. Amendola MA, Bree RL, Pollack HM, et al. Small renal cell carcinomas: resolving a diagnostic dilemma. Radiology 1988; 166: 637-641.
11. Jamis-Dow CA, Choyke PL, Jennings SB, Linehan WM, Thakore KN, Walter MM. Small (≤3-cm) renal masses: detection with CT versus US and pathologic correlation. Radiology 1996; 198:785-788.
12. Kalendar WA, Seissler W, Klotz E, Vock P. Spiral volumetric CT with single breathhold technique, continuous transport, and continuous scanner rotation. Radiology 1990; 176:181-183.
13. Silverman SG, Lee BY, Seltzer SE, Bloom DA, Corless CL, Adams DF. Small (<3 cm) renal masses: correlation of spiral CT features and pathologic findings. AJR 1994; 163:597-605.
14. Curry NS. Small renal masses (lesions smaller than 3 cm): imaging evaluation and management. AJR 1995; 164:355-362.
15. Bosniak MA, Rofsky NM. Problems in the detection and characterization of small renal masses. Radiology 1996; 198:638-641.
16. Brink JA, Heiken JP, Balfe DM, Sagel SS, Dicroce J, Vannier MW. Spiral CT: decreased spatial resolution in vivo due to broadening of section-sensitivity profile. Radiology 1992; 185:469-474.