Diagnosis of acute flank pain: Value of unenhanced helical CT

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 166, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 97-101

  Smith, Robert C ^a   Verga, Marco ^a   McCarthy, Shirley ^a   Rosenfield, Arthur T ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; APPENDICITIS; ARTICLE; BACKACHE; CLINICAL FEATURE; COMMON BILE DUCT; COMMON BILE DUCT STONE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; DIVERTICULITIS; EXTRACTION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; URETER STONE; URETEROSCOPY;

EID: 0030053777     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.166.1.8571915     Document Type: Article

References (3)

1. Smith RC, Rosenfield AT, Choe KA, et al Acute flank pain: comparison of unenhanced-enhanced CT and intravenous urography. Radiology 1995,194:789-794
2. Sommer FG, Jeffrey RB, Rubin GD, et al. Detection of ureteral calculi in patients with suspected renal colic: value of reformatted noncontrast helical CT AJR 1995;165:509-513
3. Schulz RJ, Gignac C. Application of tissue-air ratios for patient dosage in diagnostic radiology. Radiology 1976;120:687-690