Molecules and Morphology: Conflicts and Congruence within the Fern GenusTrichomanes(Hymenophyllaceae)

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 390-397

  Dubuisson, J Y ^a   Hebant Mauri R ^a   Galtier, J ^a  

^a INSTITUT DES SCIENCES DE L EVOLUTION   (France)

Author keywords

Anatomy; Combined analysis; Cytology; Hymenophyllaceae.; Morphology; RbcL; Trichomanes

Indexed keywords

RBCL PROTEIN, PLASTID; RIBULOSEBISPHOSPHATE CARBOXYLASE; VEGETABLE PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; ECOLOGY; GENETICS; PHYLOGENY; PLANT; PLANT PHYSIOLOGY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ECOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; PLANT PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT PROTEINS; PLANTS; RIBULOSE-BISPHOSPHATE CARBOXYLASE; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0032085419     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/mpev.1998.0505     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bremer K. The limits of amino acid sequences data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution. 42:1988;795-803.
2. Bull J. J., Huelsenbeck J. P., Cunningham C. W., Swofford D. L., Waddel P. J. Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42:1993;384-397.
3. Chippindale P. T., Wiens J. J. Weighting, partitioning, and combining characters in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 43:1994;278-287.
4. Copeland E. B. Trichomanes. Philip. J. Sci. 51:1933;119-270.
5. Donoghue M. J., Sanderson M. J. The suitability of molecular and morphological evidence in reconstructing plant phylogeny. Molecular Systematics of Plants. 1992;Chapman & Hall, New York.
6. Dubuisson, J.-Y. 1996, Systématique du genreTrichomanes, Université Montpellier 2, France.
7. Dubuisson J.-Y. Systematic relationships within the genusTrichomanes sensu lato. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 123:1997a;265-296.
8. Dubuisson J. Y. rbcTrichomanes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 8:1997b;128-138.
9. Farris, J. S. 1996, XARN (DOS computer program), Molekylärsystematiska laboratoriet, Naturhistoriska riksmuseet, Stockholm.
10. Farris J. S., Källersjö M., Kluge A. G., Bult C. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics. 10:1995;315-319.
11. Hasebe M., Omori T., Nakazawa M., Sano T., Kato M., Iwatsuki K. rbc. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 91:1994;5730-5734.
12. Hillis D. M., Bull J. J. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42:1993;182-192.
13. Huelsenbeck J. P., Bull J. J., Cunningham C. W. Combining data in phylogenetic analysis. TREE. 11:1996;152-158.
14. Huelsenbeck J. P., Bull J. J. A likelihood ratio test to detect conflicting phylogenetic signal. Syst. Biol. 45:1996;92-98.
15. Iwatsuki K. Studies in the systematics of filmy ferns. VII. A scheme of classification based chiefly on the Asiatic species. Acta Phytotax. Geobot. 35:1984;165-179.
16. Iwatsuki K. Hymenophyllaceae. Kramer K. U., Green P. S. The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants. Pteridophytes and Gymnosperms. I:1990;157-163 Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
17. Jackman T. R., Applebaum G., Wake D. B. Phylogenetic relationships of Bolitoglossine Salamanders: A demonstration of the effects of combining morphological and molecular data sets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:1997;883-891.
18. Kluge A. G. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships amongEpicrates. Syst. Zool. 38:1989;7-25.
19. Mishler, B. D. Donoghue, M. J. Albert, V. A. 1991, The Decay Index as a Measure of Relative Robustness within a Cladogram, Willi Hennig Society Meeting, Toronto, Ontario.
20. Morton C. V. The Genera, Subgenera, and Sections of the Hymenophyllaceae. Contrib. U.S. Nat. Herb. 38:1968;153-214.
21. Myamoto M. M., Fitch W. M. Testing species phylogenies and phylogenetic methods with congruence. Syst. Biol. 44:1995;64-76.
22. Page, R. D. M. 1993, COMPONENT: Tree comparison software for use with Microsoft Windows, The Natural History Museum, London.
23. Page R. D. M. On consensus, confidence and "total evidence" Cladistics. 12:1996;83-92.
24. Philippe H., Douzery E. The pitfalls of molecular phylogeny based on four species as illustrated by the Cetacea/Artiodactyla relationships. J. Mammal. Evol. 2:1994;133-152.
25. Pichi-Sermolli R. E. G. Tentamen Pteridophytorum genera in taxonomicum ordinem redigendi. Webbia. 31:1977;313-512.
26. Sanderson M. J. Confidence limits in phylogenies: the bootstrap revisited. Cladistics. 5:1989;113-129.
27. Sanderson, M. J. 1997, "Analysis of Large Data Sets: Phylogenetic Supertrees as an Alternative to Total Evidence, Molecules & Morphology in Systematics Symposium, Paris.
28. Siddall, M. E. 1996, ARNIE Version 1.4, In, RANDOM CLADISTICS package, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary, Gloucester Point, ftp://zoo.toronto.edu/pub.
29. Swofford, D. 1993, Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony, PAUP Version 3.1.1, Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, IL.
30. Tryon R. M., Tryon A. F. Ferns and Allied Plants, with Special Reference to Tropical America. 1982;Springer-Verlag, New York.
31. Wessels Boer J. G. The New World species ofTrichomanesDidymoglossumMicrogonium. Acta Bot. Neerlandica. 11:1962;277-330.