Institutional review board issues related to special populations

Journal of General Psychology

Volumn 125, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 156-164

  Ferraro, F Richard ^a   Orvedal, Laurie ^b   Plaud, Joseph J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA   (United States)

^b Developmental Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HUMAN RIGHTS; INFORMED CONSENT; LEGAL ASPECT; MENTAL CAPACITY; MENTAL DISEASE; MENTAL PATIENT; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RESEARCH; STANDARD; UNITED STATES;

CHILD; HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION; HUMAN RIGHTS; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MENTAL COMPETENCY; MENTAL DISORDERS; MENTALLY DISABLED PERSONS; PROFESSIONAL STAFF COMMITTEES; RESEARCH; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0032035484     PISSN: 00221309     EISSN: 19400888     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00221309809595540     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Appclbaum, P. S. (1997). Rethinking ihe conduct of psychiatric research. Archives of General Psychiatry, 54, 117-120.
2. Bonnie, K. J. (1997). Research with cognitively impaired subjects: Unfinished business in the regulation of human research. Archives o f General Psychiatry, 54, 105-111.
3. Developmental Center (1995). Conduct of research. Policy No. II-10. Grafton, ND: Author.
4. Dunst, C. J., Trivette, C. M., Starnes, A. L., Hamby, D. W., & Gordon, N. J. (1993). Building and evaluating family support initiatives: A national study of programs for persons with developmental disabilities. Baltimore. MD: Brookes.
5. Elliott, C. (1997). Caring about risks: Arc severely depressed patients competent to consent to research? Archives of General Psychiatry, 54, 113-116.
6. Fletcher, R. J. (1993). Individual psychotherapy for persons with mental retardation. In R. L. Fletcher & A. Dosen (Eds.), Mental health aspects of mental retardation: Progress in assessment and treatment. Lexington. MA: Lexington Books.
7. Grigsby, R K., & Roof, H. L. (1993). Federal policy for the protection of human subjects: Applications to research on social work practice. Research on Social Work Practice, 3. 448-461.
8. Henry, D., Keys, C., Balcazar, F., & Jopp, D. (1996). Attitudes of community-living staff members towards persons with mental retardation, mental illness, and dual diagnosis. Mental Retardation, 34. 367-379.
9. Hirschfeld, R. M. A., Winslade, W., & Krause, T. L. (1997). Protccring subjects and fostering research: Striking the proper balance. Archives of General Psychiatry, 54. 121-123.
10. Hof, P. R., Bouras, C., Perl, D. P., Sparks, L., Mehta, N., & Morrison, J. H. (1995). Age-related distribution of neuropathologic changes in the cerebral cortex of patients with Down's syndrome. Archives of Neurology. 52, 379-391.
11. Hooper, S. R., Boyd, T. A., Hynd, G. W. & Rubin, J. (1993). Definitional issues and ncu-robiological foundations of selected severe ncurodevclopmental disorders. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 8, 279-307.
12. Jacobson, J. W., & Mulick, J. A. (1996). Manual of diagnostic and professional practice in mental retardation. Washington. IX: American Psychological Association.
13. Lovaas, O. L & Smith, T. (1989). A comprehensive behavioral theory of autistic children: Paradigm for research and treatment. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry. 20, 17-29.
14. Moore, D. L. (1991). Recurrent issues in the review of medical research on human subjects. Albany Law Journal of Science & Technology, 1, 1-33.
15. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavior Research (1978). National Research Act. Washington. DC: Department of Health and Human Welfare.
16. National Institutes of Health guidelines for women and minorities. (1994). Federal Register. 59, 14508-14513.
17. Office of Research and Program Development. (1996). University of North Dakota Institutional Review Board guidelines for the protection of human subjects in research. Grand Forks. ND: Author.
18. Peterson, K. D. (1989). Teacher education program evaluation through an institutional board review of graduates. Journal of Research and Development in Education. 22, 14-20.
19. Popp, A. J., & Moore, D. L. (1994). Institutional review board evaluation of neuroscience protocols involving human subjects. Surgical Neurology. 41, 162-167.
20. Porter, J. P. (1992). The office of protection from research risks. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. 2, 279-284.
21. Ramey, C. T., Mulvihill, B. A., & Ramey, S. L. (1996). Prevention: Social and educational factors and early intervention. In J. W. Jacobson & J. A. Mulick (Eds.), Manual of diagnostic and professional practice in mental retardation (pp. 258-269). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
22. Research involving those institutionalized as mentally infirm: Report and recommendations of the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1978). Federal Register, 43, 11328-11358.
23. Santrock, J. W. (1997). Life-span development (6th ed.). Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark.
24. Schächter, M., & Demerath, R. (1996). Neuropsychology and mental retardation. In J. W. Jacobson & J. A. Mulick (Eds.). Manual of diagnosis and professional practice in mental retardation (pp. 291-317). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
25. Scchzer, J. A., Griffin, A., & Pfafflin, S. M. (1994). Forging a women's health research agenda: Policy issues for the 1990s. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
26. Selwitz, A. S., & Marts, S. A. (1992). The institutional review board: Local policies and procedures. Food and Drug Law Journal. 47, 695-700.
27. Wisniewski, H. M., & Snider, D. A. (Eds.). (1986). Mental retardation: Research, education, and technology transfer. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
28. Woodruff-Pak, D. S., Romano, S., & Papka, M. (1996). Training to criterion in eyeblink classical conditioning in Alzheimer's disease. Down Syndrome with Alzheimer's disease. and healthy elderly. Behavioral Neuroscience. 110, 22-29.