Diabetic rats prefer glucose-paired flavors over fructose-paired flavors

Appetite

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 73-83

  Ackroff, Karen ^b   Sclafani, Anthony ^a   Axen, Kathleen V ^b  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FRUCTOSE; GLUCOSE; INSULIN;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; FOOD INTAKE; GASTROINTESTINAL MOTILITY; GLUCOSE INFUSION; INSULIN RELEASE; INTRAGASTRIC DRUG ADMINISTRATION; NONHUMAN; RAT; REINFORCEMENT; TASTE; TASTE PREFERENCE;

EID: 0031080159     PISSN: 01956663     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/appe.1996.0058     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Ackroff K., Sclafani A. Flavor preferences conditioned by sugars: Rats learn to prefer glucose over fructose. Physiology and Behavior. 50:1991a;815-824.
2. Ackroff K., Sclafani A. Sucrose to Polycose preference shifts in rats: The role of taste, osmolality, and the fructose moiety. Physiology and Behavior. 49:1991b;1049-1060.
3. Brief D. J., Davis J. D. Diabetes enhances the palatability of glycerol and glucose. Physiology and Behavior. 29:1982;561-566.
4. Granneman J. G., Stricker E. M. Food intake and gastric emptying in rats with streptozotocin-induced diabetes. American Journal of Physiology. 247:1984;R1054-R1061.
5. Kneepkens C. M. F. What happens to fructose in the gut? Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology. 24 (Suppl. 171:1989;1-8.
6. Moran T. H., McHugh P. R. Distinctions among three sugars in their effects on gastric emptying and satiety. American Journal of Physiology. 241:1981;R25-R30.
7. Niewoehner C. B., Gilboe D. P., Nuttall F. Q. Metabolic effects of oral glucose in the liver of fasted rats. American Journal of Physiology. 246:1984a;E89-E94.
8. Niewoehner C. B., Gilboe D. P., Nuttall G. A., Nuttall F. Q. Metabolic effects of oral fructose in the liver of fasted rats. American Journal of Physiology. 247:1984b;E505-E512.
9. Oetting R. L., VanderWeele D. A. Insulin suppresses intake without inducing illness in sham feeding rats. Physiology and Behavior. 34:1985;557-562.
10. Panksepp J., Meeker R. Suppression of food intake in diabetic rats by voluntary consumption and intrahypothalamic injection of glucose. Physiology and Behavior. 16:1976;763-770.
11. Rodin J., Reed D., Jamner L. Metabolic effects of fructose and glucose: Implications for food intake. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 47:1988;683-689.
12. Sclafani A., Ackroff K. Glucose- and fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in rats: Taste versus postingestive conditioning. Physiology and Behavior. 5:1994;339-405.
13. Sclafani A., Cardieri C., Tucker K., Blusk D., Ackroff K. Intragastric glucose but not fructose conditions robust flavor preferences in rats. American Journal of Physiology. 265:1993;R320-R325.
14. Tepper B. J., Friedman M. I. Altered acceptability of and preference for sugar solutions by diabetic rats is normalized by high-fat diet. Appetite. 16:1991;25-38.
15. Tordoff M. G., Tepper B. J., Friedman M. I. Food flavor preferences produced by drinking glucose and oil in normal and diabetic rats: Evidence for conditioning based on fuel oxidation. Physiology and Behaviour. 41:1987;481-487.
16. Tordoff M. I., Ulrich P. M., Sandler F. Flavor preferences and fructose: Evidence that the liver detects the unconditioned stimulus for calorie-based learning. Appetite. 14:1990;29-44.
17. Van den Berghe G. Metabolic effects of fructose in the liver. B. L. Horecker E. R. Stadtman (Eds. Current topics in cellular regulation.Vol. 13. Pp. 97-135. New York: Academic Press. 1978.
18. VanderWeele D. A., Deems R. O., Kanarek R. B. Insulin modifies flavor aversions and preferences in real- and sham-feeding rats. American Journal of Physiology. 259:1990;R823-R828.