Stimulus configuration, occasion setting, and the hippocampus

Behavioral Neuroscience

Volumn 111, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 235-258

  Schmajuk, Nestor A ^a   Buhusi, Catalin V ^b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CONDITIONING; HIPPOCAMPUS; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTION; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ANIMALS; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBRAL CORTEX; CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HIPPOCAMPUS; MENTAL RECALL; NERVE NET; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT;

EID: 0030887629     PISSN: 07357044     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7044.111.2.235     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. Baker, A. G. (1974). Conditioned inhibition is not the symmetrical opposite of conditioned excitation: A test of the Rescorla-Wagner model. Learning and Motivation, 5, 369-379.
2. Berger, T. W., & Orr, W. B. (1983). Hippocampectomy selectively disrupts discrimination reversal conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response. Behavioral Brain Research, 8, 49-68.
3. Berger, T. W., Rinaldi, P. C., Weisz, D. J., & Thompson, R. F. (1983). Single-unit analysis of different hippocampal cell types during classical conditioning of rabbit nictitating membrane response. Journal of Neurophysiology, 50, 1197-1219.
4. Berger, T. W., & Thompson, R. F. (1978a). Neuronal plasticity in the limbic system during classical conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response: I. The hippocampus. Brain Research, 145, 323-346.
5. Berger, T. W., & Thompson, R. F. (1978b). Neuronal plasticity in the limbic system during classical conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response: II. Septum and mammillary bodies. Brain Research, 156, 293-314.
6. Berger, T. W., & Thompson, R. F. (1982). Hippocampal cellular plasticity during extinction of classically conditioned nictitating membrane behavior. Behavioural Brain Research, 4, 63-76.
7. Berthier, N. E., & Moore, J. W. (1990). Activity of deep cerebellar nuclear cells during classical conditioning of nictitating membrane extension in rabbits. Experimental Brain Research, 83, 44-54.
8. Bouton, M. E., & Swartzentruber, D. (1986). Analysis of the associative and occasion-setting properties of contexts participating in a Pavlovian discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 12, 333-350.
9. Breese, C. R., Hampson, R. E., & Deadwyler, S. A. (1989). Hippocampal place cells: Stereotypy and plasticity. The Journal of Neuroscience, 9, 1097-1111.
10. Brodal, P. (1992). The central nervous system. Structure and function. New York: Oxford University Press.
11. Buchanan, S. L., & Powell, D. A. (1982). Cingulate cortex: Its role in Pavlovian conditioning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 96, 755-774.
12. Buhusi, C. V., & Schmajuk, N. A. (1996). Attention, configuration, and hippocampal function. Hippocampus 6, 621-642.
13. Daum, I., Channon, S., Polkey, C. E., & Gray, J. A. (1991). Classical conditioning after temporal lobe lesions in man: Impairment in conditional discrimination. Behavioral Neuroscience, 105, 396-408.
14. Davidson, T. L. (1993). The nature and function of interoceptive signals to feed: Toward an integration of physiological and learning perspectives. Psychological Review, 100, 640-657.
15. Davidson, T. L., & Jarrard, L. E. (1989). Retention of concurrent conditional discriminations in rats with ibotenate lesions of hippocampus. Psychobiology, 17, 49-60.
16. Davidson, T. L., & Jarrard, L. E. (1993). A role for the hippocampus in the utilization of hunger signals. Behavioral and Neural Biology, 59, 167-171.
17. Davidson, T. L., McKernan, M. G., & Jarrard, L. E. (1993). Hippocampal lesions do not impair negative patterning: A challenge to configural association theory. Behavioral Neuroscience, 107, 221-234.
18. Desmond, J. E., & Moore, J. W. (1982). A brain stem region essential for classical conditioned but not unconditioned nictitating membrane response. Physiology and Behavior, 28, 1029-1033.
19. Desmond, J. E., & Moore, J. W. (1991). Single-unit activity in red nucleus during the classically conditioned rabbit nictitating membrane response. Neuroscience Research, 10, 260-279.
20. DiMattia, B. D., & Kesner, R. P. (1988). Spatial cognitive maps: Differential role of parietal cortex and hippocampal formation. Behavioral Neuroscience, 102, 471-480.
21. Gallagher, P. C., Graham, P. W., & Holland, P. C. (1990). The amygdala central nucleus and appetitive Pavlovian conditioning: Lesions impair one class of conditioned behavior. The Journal of Neuroscience, 10, 1906-1911.
22. Gallagher, P. C., & Holland, P. C. (1992). Preserved configural learning and spatial learning impairments in rats with hippocampal damage. Hippocampus, 2, 81-88.
23. Gallo, M., & Candido, A. (1995). Dorsal hippocampal lesions impair blocking but not latent inhibition of taste aversion learning in rats. Behavioral Neuroscience, 109, 413-425.
24. Garrud, P., Rawlins, J. N. P., Mackintosh, N. J., Goodal, G., Cotton, M. M., & Feldon, J. (1984). Successful overshadowing and blocking in hippocampectomized rats. Behavioural Brain Research, 12, 39-53.
25. Gluck, M. A., & Myers, C. E. (1993). Hippocampal mediation of stimulus representation: A computational theory. Hippocampus, 3, 491-516.
26. Gluck, M. A., & Myers, C. E. (1994). Context, conditioning, and hippocampal representation in animal learning. Behavioral Neuroscience, 108, 835-847.
27. Good, M., & Honey R. C. (1991). Conditioning and contextual retrieval in hippocampal rats. Behavioral Neuroscience, 105, 499-509.
28. Hamann, S. B., & Squire, L. R. (1995). On the acquisition of new declarative knowledge in amnesia. Behavioral Neuroscience, 109, 1027-1044.
29. Hirsh, R. (1974). The hippocampus and contextual retrieval of information from memory: A theory. Behavioral Biology, 12, 421-444.
30. Hirsh, R., Leber, B., & Gillman, K. (1978). Fornix fibers and motivational states as controllers of behavior: A study stimulated by the contextual retrieval theory. Behavioral Biology, 22, 463-478.
31. Holland, P. C. (1977). Conditioned stimulus as a determinant of the form of the Pavlovian conditioned response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 3, 77-104.
32. Holland, P. C. (1983). Occasion-setting in Pavlovian feature positive discriminations. In M. L. Commons, R. J. Herrnstein, & A. R. Wagner (Eds.), Quantitative analyses of behavior: Discrimination processes (Vol. 4, pp. 183-206). New York: Ballinger.
33. Holland, P. C. (1986). Transfer after serial feature positive discrimination training. Learning and Motivation, 17, 243-268.
34. Holland, P. C. (1989a). Occasion setting with simultaneous compounds in rats. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 15, 183-193.
35. Holland, P. C. (1989b). Transfer of negative occasion setting and conditioned inhibition across conditioned and unconditioned stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 15, 311-328.
36. Holland, P. C. (1991). Learning, thirst, and drinking. In D. J. Ramsey & D. Booth (Eds.), Thirst: physiological and psychological aspects (pp. 279-295). New York: Springer-Verlag.
37. Holland, P. C. (1992). Occasion setting in Pavlovian conditioning. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 28, 69-125.
38. Honey, R., & Good, M. (1993). Selective hippocampal lesions abolish the contextual specificity of latent inhibition and conditioning. Behavioral Neuroscience, 107, 23-33.
39. Jarrard, L. E., & Davidson, T. L. (1991). On the hippocampus and learned conditional responding: Effects of aspiration versus ibotenate lesions. Hippocampus, 1, 103-113.
40. Kehoe, E. J. (1986) Summation and configuration in conditioning of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response to compound stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 12, 186-195.
41. Kehoe, E. J. (1988). A layered network model of associative learning: Learning to learn and configuration. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 411-422.
42. Knudsen, E. I., & Brainard, M. S. (1995). Creating a unified representation of visual and auditory space in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 19-43.
43. LeDoux, J. E. (1992). Emotion and the amygdala. In J. Aggleton (Ed.), The amygdala: Neurobiological aspects of emotion, memory, and mental dysfunction (pp. 339-351). New York: Wiley-Liss.
44. Loechner, K. J., & Weisz, D. J. (1987). Hippocampectomy and feature-positive discrimination. Behavioural Brain Research, 26, 63-73.
45. McCormick, D. A., Steinmetz, J. E., & Thompson, R. F. (1985). Lesions of the inferior olivary complex cause extinction of the classically conditioned eyeblink response. Brain Research, 359, 120-130.
46. Micco, D. J., & Schwartz, M. (1972). Effects of hippocampal lesions upon the developments of Pavlovian internal inhibition in rats. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 76, 371-377.
47. Milner, B. R. (1966). Amnesia following operation on temporal lobes. In C. W. N. Whitty & O. L. Zangwill (Eds.), Amnesia (pp. 109-133). London: Butterworths.
48. Moore, J. W., Yeo, C. H., Oakley, D. A., & Russell, I. S. (1980). Conditioned inhibition of the nictitating membrane response in decorticate rabbits. Behavioural Brain Research, 1, 397-409.
49. Morris, R. G. M., Garrud, P., Rawlins, J. N. P., & O'Keefe, J. (1982). Place navigation impaired in rats with hippocampal lesions. Nature, 297, 681-683.
50. Morris, R. G. M., Schenk, F., Tweedie, F., & Jarrard, L. E. (1990). Ibotenate lesions of hippocampus and/or subiculum: Dissociating components of allocentric spatial learning. European Journal of Neuroscience, 2, 1016-1028.
51. Myers, C. E., Gluck, M. A., & Granger, R. (1995). Dissociation of hippocampal and entorhinal function in associative learning: A computational approach. Psychobiology, 23, 116-138.
52. Oakley, D. A., & Russell, I. S. (1972). Neocortical lesions and Pavlovian conditioning. Physiology and Behavior, 8, 915-926.
53. Oakley, D. A., & Russell, I. S. (1973). Differential and reversal conditioning in partially neodecorticate rabbits. Physiology and Behavior, 13, 221-230.
54. Oakley, D. A., & Russell, I. S. (1975). Role of cortex in Pavlovian discrimination learning. Physiology and Behavior, 15, 315-321.
55. Orr, W. B., & Berger, T. W. (1985). Hippocampectomy disrupts the topography of conditioned nictitating membrane responses during reversal learning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 99, 35-45.
56. Packard, M. G., & McGaugh, J. L. (1992). Double dissociation of fornix and caudate nucleus lesions on acquisition of two water maze tasks: Further evidence for multiple memory systems. Behavioral Neuroscience, 106, 439-446.
57. Redhead, E. S., & Pearce, J. M. (1995a). Similarity and discrimination learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48B, 46-66.
58. Redhead, E. S., & Pearce, J. M. (1995b). Stimulus salience and negative patterning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48B, 67-83.
59. Rescorla, R. A. (1973). Evidence for a unique-cue account of configural conditioning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 85, 331-338.
60. Rescorla, R. A. (1985). Conditioned inhibition and facilitation. In R. R. Miller & N. E. Spear (Eds.) Information processing in animals: Conditioned inhibition (pp. 299-326). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
61. Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II (pp. 64-99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
62. Rickert, E. J., Bent, T. L., Lane, P., & French, J. (1978). Hippocampectomy and the attenuation of blocking. Behavioral Biology, 22, 147-160.
63. Rickert, E. J., Lorden, J. F., Dawson, R., Smyly, E. & Callahan, M. F. (1979). Stimulus processing and stimulus selection in rats with hippocampal lesions. Behavioral and Neural Biology, 27, 454-465.
64. Rosenfield, M. E., & Moore, J. W. (1995) Connection to cerebellar cortex (Larsell's HVI) in the rabbit: A WGA-HRP study with implication for classical eyeblink conditioning. Behavioral Neuroscience, 109, 1106-1118.
65. Ross, R. T., & Holland, P. C. (1981). Conditioning of simultaneous and serial feature-positive discriminations. Animal Learning & Behavior, 9, 293-303.
66. Ross, R. T., Orr, W. B., Holland, P. C., & Berger, T. W. (1984). Hippocampectomy disrupts acquisition and retention of learned conditional responding. Behavioral Neuroscience, 98, 211-225.
67. Rudy, J. W., & Sutherland, R. J. (1989). The hippocampal formation is necessary for rats to learn and remember configural discriminations. Behavioural Brain Research, 34, 97-109.
68. Rudy, J. W., & Sutherland, R. J. (1995). Configurai association theory and the hippocampal formation: An appraisal and reconfiguration. Hippocampus, 5, 375-389.
69. Rumelhart, D. E., Hinten, G. E., & Williams, G. E. (1986). Learning internal representations by error propagation. In D. E. Rumelhart & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition: Vol. 1. Foundations (pp. 318-362). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
70. Schmajuk, N. A., & Blair, H. T. (1993). Stimulus configuration, place learning, and the hippocampus. Behavioural Brain Research, 59, 103-117.
71. Schmajuk, N. A., & Blair, H. T. (1995). Time, space, and the hippocampus. In N. E. Spear, L. P. Spear, & M. Woodruff (Eds.), Neurobehavioral plasticity: Learning, development, and response to brain insult (pp. 33-56). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
72. Schmajuk, N. A., & DiCarlo. J. J. (1992). Stimulus configuration, classical conditioning, and the hippocampus. Psychological Review, 99, 268-305.
73. Schmajuk, N. A., & Holland, P. C. (1995). Multiple response systems in classical conditioning. Proceedings of the World Congress on Neural Networks, 1, 700-703.
74. Schmajuk, N. A., Lam, P., & Christiansen, B. A. (1994). Hippocampectomy disrupts latent inhibition of the rat eyeblink conditioning. Physiology and Behavior, 55, 597-601.
75. Schmajuk, N. A., Lam, Y. W., & Gray, J. A. (1996). Latent inhibition: A neural network approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 321-349.
76. Schmajuk, N. A., Lamoureux, J., & Holland, P. C. (in press). Occasion setting: A neural network approach. Psychological Review.
77. Schmajuk, N. A., Spear, N. E., & Isaacson, R. L. (1983). Absence of overshadowing in rats with hippocampal lesions. Physiological Psychology, 11, 59-62.
78. Schmajuk, N. A., Thieme, A. D., & Blair, H. T. (1993). Maps, routes, and the hippocampus: A neural network approach. Hippocampus, 3, 387-400.
79. Sears, L. L., & Steinmetz, J. E. (1990). Acquisition of classically conditioned-related activity in the hippocampus is affected by lesion of the cerebelllar interpositus nucleus. Behavioral Neuroscience, 104, 681-692.
80. Shepard, R. N. (1991). Integrality vs. separability of stimulus dimensions. In Lockhead, G. R., & Pomerantz, J. R. (Eds.), The perception of structure (pp. 53-77). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
81. Solomon, P. R. (1977). Role of the hippocampus in blocking and conditioned inhibition of rabbit's nictitating membrane response. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 91, 407-417.
82. Squire, L. R., Shimamura, A. P., & Amaral, D. G. (1989). Memory and the hippocampus. In J. H. Byrne & W. O. Berry (Eds.), Neural models of plasticity (pp. 208-239). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
83. Sutherland, N. S., Mackintosh, N. J., & Mackintosh, J. (1963). Simultaneous discrimination training of Octopus and transfer of discrimination along a continuum. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 56, 150-156.
84. Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1981). Toward a modern theory of adaptive networks: Expectation and prediction. Psychological Review, 88, 135-170.
85. Swartzentruber, D. (1995). Modulatory mechanisms in Pavlovian conditioning. Animal Learning and Behavior, 23, 123-143.
86. Thompson, R. F. (1986). The neurobiology of learning and memory. Science, 233, 941-947.
87. Weinberger, N. M. (1995). Dynamic regulation of receptive fields and maps in the adult cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 129-158.
88. Weiss, C., Kroforst-Collins, M. A., Disterhoft, J. F. (in press). Activity of hippocampal pyramidal neurons during trace eyeblink conditioning. Hippocampus.
89. Whishaw, I. Q., & Tomie, J. (1991). Acquisition and retention by hippocampal rats of simple, conditional and configural tasks using tactile and olfactory cues: Implications for hippocampal function. Behavioral Neuroscience, 105, 787-797.
90. Wickelgren, W. A. (1979). Chunking and consolidation: A theoretical synthesis of semantic networks, configuring in conditioning, S-R versus cognitive learning, normal forgetting, the amnesic syndrome, and the hippocampal arousal system. Psychological Review, 86, 44-60.
91. Widrow, B., & Hoff, M. E. (1960). Adaptive switching circuits. Institute of Radio Engineers, Western Electronic Show and Convention, Convention Record, Part IV, 96-104.
92. Winocur, G., Rawlins, J. N. P., & Gray, J. A. (1987). The hippocampus and conditioning to contextual cues. Behavioral Neuroscience, 101, 617-625.
93. Woodbury, C. B. (1943). The learning of stimulus patterns by dogs. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 35, 29-40.
94. Yeo, C. H., Hardiman, M. J., Moore, J. W., & Russell, I. S. (1984). Trace conditioning of the nictitating membrane response in decorticate rabbits. Behavioural Brain Research, 11, 85-88.
95. Zimmer-Hart, C. L., & Rescorla, R. A. (1974). Extinction of Pavlovian conditioned inhibition. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 86, 837-845.