Lek locations and patterns of female movement and distribution in a neotropical frugivorous bird

Animal Behaviour

Volumn 53, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 235-247

  Westcott, David A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b CSIRO   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FEMALE TRAFFIC; HOTSPOT; LEK; OCHRE-BELLIED FLYCATCHER;

MIONECTES OLEAGINEUS;

EID: 0031060889     PISSN: 00033472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1996.0294     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Alexander, R. D. 1974. Natural selection and specialized chorusing behaviour in acoustical insects. In: Insects, Science and Society (Ed. by D. Pimentel), pp. 35-77. New York: Academic Press.
2. Apollonio, M. 1989. Lekking in fallow deer: just a matter of density? Ethol. Ecol. Evol., 1, 291-294.
3. Apollonio, M., Festa-Bianchet, M., Mari, F. & Riva, M. 1990. Site-specific asymmetries in male copulatory success in a fallow deer lek. Anim. Behav., 39, 205-212.
4. Arak, A. 1983. Male-male competition and mate choice in anuran amphibians. In: Mate Choice (Ed. by P. Bateson), pp. 181-210. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Balmford, A. 1991. Mate choice on leks. Trends Ecol. Evol., 6, 87-92.
6. Balmford, A., Deutsch, J. C., Nefdt, R. J. C. & Clutton-Brock, T. 1993. Testing hotspot models of lek evolution: data from three species of ungulates. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 33, 57-65.
7. Beehler, B. M. & Foster, M. S. 1988. Hotshots, hotspots, and female preference in the organization of lek mating systems. Am. Nat., 131, 203-219.
8. Bradbury, J. W. 1981. The evolution of leks. In: Natural Selection and Social Behavior: Recent Research and Theory (Ed. by R. D. Alexander & D. Tinkle), pp. 138-169. New York: Chiron Press.
9. Bradbury, J. W. & Gibson, R. M. 1983. Leks and mate choice. In: Mate Choice (Ed. by P. Bateson), pp. 109-138. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Bradbury, J. W., Gibson, R. & Tsai, I. M. 1986. Hotspots and the dispersion of leks. Anim. Behav., 34, 1694-1709.
11. Bradbury, J. W., Gibson, R. M., McCarthy, C. E. & Vehrencamp, S. L. 1989. Dispersion of displaying male sage grouse II. The role of female dispersion. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 24, 15-24.
12. Clutton-Brock, T. H., Green, D., Hiraiwa-Hasegawa, M. & Albon, S. D. 1988. Passing the buck: resource defense, lek breeding and mate choice in fallow deer. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 23, 281-296.
13. Clutton-Brock, T. H., Deutsch, J. C. & Nefdt, R. J. C. 1993. The evolution of ungulate leks. Anim. Behav., 46, 1121-1138.
14. Crook, J. H. 1965. The adaptive significance of avian social organizations. Symp. zool. Soc. Lond., 14, 181-218.
15. Davies, N. B. 1991. Mating systems. In: Behavioural Ecology (Ed. by J. R. Krebs & N. B. Davies), pp. 263-294. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
16. Emlen, S. T. & Oring, L. W. 1977. Ecology, sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. Science, 197, 215-233.
17. Gibson, J. M., Taylor, C. E. & Jefferson, D. R. 1990. Lek formation by female choice: a simulation study. Behav. Ecol., 1, 36-42.
18. Gibson, R. M. 1992. Lek formation in sage grouse: the effect of female choice on male territory settlement. Anim. Behav., 43, 443-450.
19. Gosling, L. M. 1986. The evolution of mating strategies in male antelope. In: Ecological Aspects of Social Evolution: Birds and Mammals (Ed. by D. I. Rubenstein & R. W. Wrangham), pp. 244-281. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
20. Gosling, L. M. & Petrie, M. 1990. Lekking in topi: a consequence of satellite behaviour by small males at hotspots. Anim. Behav., 40, 272-287.
21. Hjorth, I. 1970. Reproductive behaviour in the Tetraonidae. Viltrevy, 7, 184-596.
22. Höglund, J. & Robertson, J. G. M. 1990a. Female preferences, male decision rules and the evolution of leks in the gerat snipe Gallinago media. Anim. Behav., 40, 15-22.
23. Höglund, J. & Robertson, J. G. M. 1990b. Spacing of leks in relation to female home ranges, habitat requirements and male attractiveness in the great snipe (Gallinago media). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 26, 173-180.
24. Koivisto, I. 1965. Behaviour of the black grouse during the spring display. Finn. Game Res., 26, 1-60.
25. Kruijt, J. P. & Vos, G. J. 1988. Individual variation in reproductive success in male black grouse, Tetrao tetrix L. In: Reproductive Success (Ed. by T. H. Clutton-Brock), pp. 279-290. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26. Kruijt, J. P., de Vos, G. J. & Bossema, I. 1972. The arena system of black grouse. Proc. Int. Ornithol. Congr., 15, 399-423.
27. Lill, A. 1974. Social organization and space utilization in the lek-forming white bearded manakin, M. manacus trinitatis. Z. Tierpsychol., 36, 513-530.
28. Lill, A. 1976. Lek behaviour in the golden-headed manakin, Pipra erythrocephala, in Trinidad, West Indies. Forsch. Verhalt., 18, 1-84.
29. McDonald, D. B. 1989. Cooperation under sexual selection: age-graded changes in a lekking bird. Am. Nat., 134, 709-730.
30. Parker, G. A. 1978. Evolution of competitive mate searching. A. Rev. Entomol., 23, 173-196.
31. Pruett-Jones, S. G. 1988. Lekking versus solitary display: temporal variations in dispersion in the buff-breasted sandpiper. Anim. Behav., 36, 1740-1752.
32. Pruett-Jones, S. G. & Pruett-Jones, M. A. 1990. Sexual selection through female choice in Lawes' parotia, a lek-mating bird of paradise. Evolution, 44, 486-501.
33. Queller, D. C. 1987. The evolution of leks through female choice. Anim. Behav., 35, 1424-1432.
34. Schroeder, M. A. & White, G. C. 1993. Dispersion of greater prairie chicken nests in relation to lek location: evaluation of the hot-spot hypothesis of lek evolution. Behav. Ecol., 4, 266-270.
35. Sherry, T. W. 1983. Mionectes oleagineus. In: Costa Rican Natural History (Ed. by D. H. Janzen), pp. 586-587. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
36. Stillman, R. A., Clutton-Brock, T. H. & Sutherland, W. J. 1993. Black holes, mate retention, and the evolution of ungulate leks. Behav. Ecol., 4, 1-6.
37. Théry, M. 1992. The evolution of leks through female choice: differential clustering and space utilization in six sympatric manakins. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 30, 227-237.
38. Tosi, J. A., Jr. 1969. Mapa ecológico, Republica de Costa Rica: según la classificación de zonas de vida del mundo de L. H. Holdridge. San José, Costa Rica: Centro Científico Tropical.
39. Trail, P. W. & Adams, E. S. 1989. Active mate choice at cock-of-the-rock leks: tactics of sampling and comparison. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 25, 283-292.
40. Vehrencamp, S. L. & Bradbury, J. W. 1984. Mating systems and ecology. In: Behavioural Ecology (Ed. by J. R. Krebs & N. Davies), pp. 251-278. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
41. Wade, M. J. & Pruett-Jones, S. G. 1990. Female copying increases the variance in male mating success. Proc. natn Acad. Sci., U.S.A., 87, 5749-5753.
42. Wegge, P. & Rolstad, J. 1986. Size and spacing of capercaillie leks in relation to social behavior and habitat. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 19, 401-408.
43. Westcott, D. A. 1992. Inter- and intra-sexual selection: the role of song in a lek mating system. Anim. Behav., 44, 695-703.
44. Westcott, D. A. 1994. Leks of leks: a role for hotspots in lek evolution? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B, 258, 281-286.
45. Westcott, D. A. 1995. Lekking in the ochre-bellied flycatcher, Mionectes oleagineus. Ph.D. thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
46. Westcott, D. A. & Smith, J. N. M. 1994. Behavior and social organization during the breeding season in Mionectes oleagineus, a lekking flycatcher. Condor, 111, 672-683.
47. Wickman, P.-O., Garcia-Barrios, E. & Rappe-George, C. 1995. The location of landmark leks in the small heath butterfly, Coenonympha pamphilus: evidence against the hotspot model. Behav. Ecol., 6, 39-45.
48. Wittenberger, J. F. 1978. The evolution of mating systems of grouse. Condor, 80, 126-137.
49. Worthington, A. 1982. Population sizes and breeding rhythms of manakins in relation to food supply. In: The Ecology of a Tropical Rainforest: Seasonal Rhythms and Long Term Changes (Ed. by E. G. J. Leigh, A. S. Rand & D. M. Windsor), pp. 213-225. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.