Solvent controls synthesis and properties of supramolecular structures

Chemistry - A European Journal

Volumn 4, Issue 8, 1998, Pages 1449-1457

  Tokunaga, Yuji ^a   Rudkevich, Dmitry M ^a   Santamaría, Javier ^a   Hilmersson, Göran ^a   Rebek Jr , Julius ^a  

^a SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Hydrogen bonds; Molecular recognition; Solvent effects; Supramolecular chemistry; Template synthesis

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031877894     PISSN: 09476539     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3765(19980807)4:8<1449::AID-CHEM1449>3.0.CO;2-Y     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. a) C. J. Pederson, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 7017-7036;
2. b) C. J. Pederson, Angew. Chem. 1988, 100, 1053-1059; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1988, 27, 1021-1027;
3. b) C. J. Pederson, Angew. Chem. 1988, 100, 1053-1059; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1988, 27, 1021-1027;
4. c) L. Mandolini, Pure Appl. Chem. 1986, 58, 1485-1492;
5. d) S. Capobianchi, G. Doddi, G. Ercolani, J. W. Keyes, P. Mencarelli, J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 7015-7017;
6. e) D. B. Amabilino, J.F. Stoddart, Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 2725-2828;
7. f) F. Vögtle, T. Dünnwald, T. Schmidt, Acc. Chem. Res. 1996, 29, 451-460;
8. g) S. Anderson, H. L. Anderson, J. K. M. Sanders, ibid. 1993, 26, 469-475;
9. h) R. Hoss, F. Vögtle, Angew. Chem. 1994, 106, 389-398; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1994, 33, 375-384.
10. h) R. Hoss, F. Vögtle, Angew. Chem. 1994, 106, 389-398; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1994, 33, 375-384.
11. For template effects in selfassembly see: i) B. Hasenknopf, J.-M. Lehn, B. O. Kneisel, G. Baum, D. Fenske, ibid. 1996, 108, 1987-1990 and 1996, 35, 1838-1840;
12. For template effects in selfassembly see: i) B. Hasenknopf, J.-M. Lehn, B. O. Kneisel, G. Baum, D. Fenske, ibid. 1996, 108, 1987-1990 and 1996, 35, 1838-1840;
13. j) D. Philp, J. F. Stoddart, ibid. 1996, 108, 1242-1286 and 1996, 35, 1154-1196;
14. j) D. Philp, J. F. Stoddart, ibid. 1996, 108, 1242-1286 and 1996, 35, 1154-1196;
15. k) R. G. Chapman, J. C. Sherman, Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 15911-15945. See also reviews by D. H. Busch, J.-P. Sauvage, J. F. Stoddart, and J. K. M. Sanders, in Comprehensive Supramolecular Chemistry, Vol. 9 (Eds.: J.-P. Sauvage, M. W. Hosseini), Pergamon, 1996.
16. k) R. G. Chapman, J. C. Sherman, Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 15911-15945. See also reviews by D. H. Busch, J.-P. Sauvage, J. F. Stoddart, and J. K. M. Sanders, in Comprehensive Supramolecular Chemistry, Vol. 9 (Eds.: J.-P. Sauvage, M. W. Hosseini), Pergamon, 1996.
17. a) J. A. Bryant, M. T. Blanda, M. Vincenti, D. J. Cram, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 2167-2172;
18. b) J. C. Sherman, C. B. Knobler, D. J. Cram, ibid. 1991, 113, 2194-2204;
19. c) D. J. Cram, M. E. Tanner, C. B. Knobler, ibid. 1991, 113, 7717-7727.
20. a) R. G. Chapman, N. Chopra, E. D. Cochien, J. C. Sherman, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 369-370;
21. b) R. G. Chapman, J. C. Sherman, ibid. 1995, 117, 9081-9082;
22. c) N. Chopra, J. C. Sherman, Supramol. Chem. 1995, 5, 31-37;
23. d) K. Nakamura, C. Sheu, A. E. Keating, K. N. Houk, J. C. Sherman, R. G. Chapman, W. L. Jorgensen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 4321-4322;
24. e) N. Chopra, J. C. Sherman, Angew. Chem. 1997, 109, 1828-1830; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 1727-1729.
25. e) N. Chopra, J. C. Sherman, Angew. Chem. 1997, 109, 1828-1830; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 1727-1729.
26. a) P. Timmerman, W. Verboom, F. C. J. M. van Veggel, J. P. M. van Duynhoven, D. N. Reinhoudt, Angew. Chem. 1994, 106, 2437-2440; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1994, 33, 2345-2348;
27. a) P. Timmerman, W. Verboom, F. C. J. M. van Veggel, J. P. M. van Duynhoven, D. N. Reinhoudt, Angew. Chem. 1994, 106, 2437-2440; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1994, 33, 2345-2348;
28. b) A. M. A. van Wageningen, P. Timmerman, J. P. M. van Duynhoven, W. Verboom, F. C. J. M. van Veggel, D. N. Reihoudt, Chem. Eur. J. 1997, 3, 639-654.
29. This phrase first appeared as a title of a lecture by D. J. Cram.
30. J. C. Nelson, J. G. Saven, J. S. Moore, P. G. Wolynes, Science 1997, 277, 1793-1796.
31. D.M. Rudkevich, G. Hilmersson, J. Rebek, Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 9911-9912.
32. R. K. Castellano, D. M. Rudkevich, J. Rebek, Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 10002-10003.
33. a) D. J. Cram, H.-J. Choi, J. A. Bryant, C. B. Knobler, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 7748-7765;
34. b) J. R. Moran, J. L. Ericson, E. Dalcanale, J. A. Bryant, C. B. Knobler, D. J. Cram, ibid. 1991, 113, 5707-5714.
35. a) R. S. Meissner, J. Rebek, Jr., J. de Mendoza, Science 1995, 270, 1485-1488;
36. b) R. S. Meissner, X. Garcias, S. Mecozzi, J. Rebek, Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 77-85.
37. Recently, Sanders et al. described thermodynamically controlled covalent macrocyclizations by predisposition of building blocks in a reaction mixture, see: S. J. Rowan, D. G. Hamilton, P.A. Brady, J. K. M. Sanders, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 2578-2579 and references therein. No solvent effect was discussed.
38. Part of this work was published as a preliminary communication: Y. Tokunaga, D. M. Rudkevich, J. Rebek, Jr., Angew. Chem. 1997, 109, 2770-2773; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 2656-2659.
39. Part of this work was published as a preliminary communication: Y. Tokunaga, D. M. Rudkevich, J. Rebek, Jr., Angew. Chem. 1997, 109, 2770-2773; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 2656-2659.
40. F. Mohamadi, N. G. Richards, W. C. Guida, R. Liskamp, M. Lipton, C. Caufield, G. Chang, T. Hendrickson, W. C. Still, J. Comput. Chem. 1990, 11, 440-467.
41. D. M. Rudkevich, J. Rebek, Jr., Angew. Chem. 1997, 109, 877-879; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 846-848.
42. D. M. Rudkevich, J. Rebek, Jr., Angew. Chem. 1997, 109, 877-879; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 846-848.
43. -1 more stable in benzene than in chloroform.
44. A. Kumar, G. Wagner, R. R. Ernst, K. Wütrich, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 3654-3658.
45. 3 for smaller glycoluril-based dimers (tennis balls) was determined from EXSY measurements. T. Szabo, G. Hilmersson, J. Rebek, Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 6193-6194.
46. 3 for smaller glycoluril-based dimers (tennis balls) was determined from EXSY measurements. T. Szabo, G. Hilmersson, J. Rebek, Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 6193-6194.
47. 1H NMR spectroscopy.
48. J. Kang, G. Hilmersson, J. Santamaría, J. Rebek, Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 3650-3656.
49. a) M. A. Aoki, K. Nakashima, S. Tsutsui, S. Shinkai, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2 1993, 347-354;
50. b) K. Hanabusa, Y. Matsumoto, T. Miki, T. Koyama, H. Shirai, J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1994, 1401-1402;
51. c) H. T. Stock, N. J. Turner, R. McCague, J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1995, 2063-2064;
52. d) G. T. Crisp, J. Gore, Synth. Commun. 1997, 27, 2203-2215.
53. The role of hydrogen bonding in stabilization and/or break-down of the tetrahedral zwitter-ionic intermediate has been discussed; see: a) C.-W. Su, J. Watson, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 1854-1857; b) L. Wang, H. Zipse, Liebigs Ann. 1996, 1501-1509; c) H. Zipse, L. Wang, K. N. Houk, ibid. 1996, 1511-1522.
54. The role of hydrogen bonding in stabilization and/or break-down of the tetrahedral zwitter-ionic intermediate has been discussed; see: a) C.-W. Su, J. Watson, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 1854-1857; b) L. Wang, H. Zipse, Liebigs Ann. 1996, 1501-1509; c) H. Zipse, L. Wang, K. N. Houk, ibid. 1996, 1511-1522.
55. The role of hydrogen bonding in stabilization and/or break-down of the tetrahedral zwitter-ionic intermediate has been discussed; see: a) C.-W. Su, J. Watson, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 1854-1857; b) L. Wang, H. Zipse, Liebigs Ann. 1996, 1501-1509; c) H. Zipse, L. Wang, K. N. Houk, ibid. 1996, 1511-1522.
56. D must be still several orders of magnitude lower than in our case. This means that the dimer dissociation rates in their case must be much faster, so the catalyst is not inhibited. For the kinetic analysis of templated self-replicating systems that are based on molecular recognition see: a) J. S. Nowick, Q. Feng, T. Tjivikua, P. Ballester, J. Rebek, Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 8831-8839; b) D. N. Reinhoudt, D.M. Rudkevich, F. de Jong, ibid. 1996, 118, 6880-6889.
57. D must be still several orders of magnitude lower than in our case. This means that the dimer dissociation rates in their case must be much faster, so the catalyst is not inhibited. For the kinetic analysis of templated self-replicating systems that are based on molecular recognition see: a) J. S. Nowick, Q. Feng, T. Tjivikua, P. Ballester, J. Rebek, Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 8831-8839; b) D. N. Reinhoudt, D.M. Rudkevich, F. de Jong, ibid. 1996, 118, 6880-6889.
58. D must be still several orders of magnitude lower than in our case. This means that the dimer dissociation rates in their case must be much faster, so the catalyst is not inhibited. For the kinetic analysis of templated self-replicating systems that are based on molecular recognition see: a) J. S. Nowick, Q. Feng, T. Tjivikua, P. Ballester, J. Rebek, Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 8831-8839; b) D. N. Reinhoudt, D.M. Rudkevich, F. de Jong, ibid. 1996, 118, 6880-6889.
59. D must be still several orders of magnitude lower than in our case. This means that the dimer dissociation rates in their case must be much faster, so the catalyst is not inhibited. For the kinetic analysis of templated self-replicating systems that are based on molecular recognition see: a) J. S. Nowick, Q. Feng, T. Tjivikua, P. Ballester, J. Rebek, Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 8831-8839; b) D. N. Reinhoudt, D.M. Rudkevich, F. de Jong, ibid. 1996, 118, 6880-6889.
60. D must be still several orders of magnitude lower than in our case. This means that the dimer dissociation rates in their case must be much faster, so the catalyst is not inhibited. For the kinetic analysis of templated self-replicating systems that are based on molecular recognition see: a) J. S. Nowick, Q. Feng, T. Tjivikua, P. Ballester, J. Rebek, Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 8831-8839; b) D. N. Reinhoudt, D.M. Rudkevich, F. de Jong, ibid. 1996, 118, 6880-6889.
61. D must be still several orders of magnitude lower than in our case. This means that the dimer dissociation rates in their case must be much faster, so the catalyst is not inhibited. For the kinetic analysis of templated self-replicating systems that are based on molecular recognition see: a) J. S. Nowick, Q. Feng, T. Tjivikua, P. Ballester, J. Rebek, Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 8831-8839; b) D. N. Reinhoudt, D.M. Rudkevich, F. de Jong, ibid. 1996, 118, 6880-6889.
62. D must be still several orders of magnitude lower than in our case. This means that the dimer dissociation rates in their case must be much faster, so the catalyst is not inhibited. For the kinetic analysis of templated self-replicating systems that are based on molecular recognition see: a) J. S. Nowick, Q. Feng, T. Tjivikua, P. Ballester, J. Rebek, Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 8831-8839; b) D. N. Reinhoudt, D.M. Rudkevich, F. de Jong, ibid. 1996, 118, 6880-6889.
63. D must be still several orders of magnitude lower than in our case. This means that the dimer dissociation rates in their case must be much faster, so the catalyst is not inhibited. For the kinetic analysis of templated self-replicating systems that are based on molecular recognition see: a) J. S. Nowick, Q. Feng, T. Tjivikua, P. Ballester, J. Rebek, Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 8831-8839; b) D. N. Reinhoudt, D.M. Rudkevich, F. de Jong, ibid. 1996, 118, 6880-6889.
64. [10] The enhanced yields of 3 were observed in benzene and p-xylene, but not in chloroform, wherein the carboxamide is not encapsulated.
65. See for example: A. Imhof, D. J. Pine, Nature 1997, 389, 948-951, and references therein.
66. a) E. E. Simanek, M. Mammen, D. M. Gordon, D. Chin, J. P. Mathias, C. T. Seto, G. M. Whitesides, Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 607-619;
67. b) E. E. Simanek, M. I. M. Wazeer, J. P. Mathias, G. M. Whitesides, J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 4904-4909. See also ref. [27c].
68. Y. Kobuke, T. Fueno, J. Furukawa, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 6548-6553. See also: M. Nishio, Y. Umezawa, M. Hirota, Y. Takeuchi, Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 8665-8701.
69. Y. Kobuke, T. Fueno, J. Furukawa, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 6548-6553. See also: M. Nishio, Y. Umezawa, M. Hirota, Y. Takeuchi, Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 8665-8701.
70. a) P. Timmerman, K. G. A. Nierop, E. A. Brinks, W. Verboom, F. C. J. M. van Veggel, W. P. van Hoorn, D. N. Reinhoudt, Chem. Eur. J. 1995, 1, 132-143;
71. b) I. Higler, P. Timmerman, W. Verboom, D. N. Reinhoudt, J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 5920-5931;
72. c) I. Higler, W. Verboom, F. C. J. M. van Veggel, F. de Jong, D. N. Reinhoudt, D. N. Liebigs Ann./Recueil 1997, 1577-1586.
73. L. R. MacGillivray, J. L. Atwood, Nature 1997, 389, 469-472.
74. Y. Tokunaga, J. Rebek, Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 66-69.
75. C. L. Perrin, T. J. Dwyer, Chem. Rev. 1990, 90, 935-967.