Variable cerebral responses to equally distinct deviance in four auditory dimensions: A mismatch negativity study

Psychophysiology

Volumn 35, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 745-754

  Deouell, Leon Y ^a   Bentin, Shlomo ^b  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Auditory attention; Auditory discrimination; Clinical application; Event related potentials; Mismatch negativity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; NEUROTRANSMISSION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 0031725963     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0048577298980039     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Aaltonen, O., Niemi, P., Nyrke, T., & Tuhkanen, M. (1987). Event related brain potentials and the perception of a phonetic continuum. Biological Psychology, 24, 197-207.
2. Böttcher-Gandor, C., & Ullsperger, P. (1992). Mismatch negativity in event-related potentials as a function of varying inter-stimulus intervals. Psychophysiology, 29, 546-550.
3. Deacon, D., Nousak, J., Pilotti, M., Ritter, W., & Yang, C. M. (1998) Automatic change detection: Does the auditory system use representations of individual stimulus features or gestalts? Psychophysiology, 35, 413-419.
4. Deouell, L. Y., Bentin, S., & Giard, M. H. (1998). Mismatch negativity in dichotic listening: Evidence for interhemispheric differences and multiple generators. Psychophysiology, 35, 355-365.
5. Escerea, C., & Grau, C. (1996). Short-term replicability of the mismatch negativity. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 100, 549-554.
6. Giard, M. H., Lavikainen, J., Reinikainen, K., Perrin, F., Bertrand, O., Pernier, J., & Näätänen, R. (1995). Separate representation of stimulus frequency, intensity, and duration in auditory sensory memory: An event related potential and dipole-model analysis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 133-143.
7. Giard, M. H., Perrin, F., Pernier, J., & Bouchet, P. (1990). Brain generators implicated in the processing of auditory stimulus deviance: A topographic event related potential study. Psychophysiology, 27, 627-640.
8. Kane, N. M., Curry, H., Buttler, S. R., & Cummins, B. H. (1993). Electrophysiological indicators of awakening from coma. Lancet, 341, 688.
9. Korpilahti, P., & Lang, H. (1994). Auditory ERP components and mismatch negativity in dysphasic children. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 91, 256-264.
10. Kraus N., & McGee, T. (1994). Mismatch negativity in the assessment of central auditory function. American Journal of Audiology, 3, 139-151.
11. Kraus, N., McGee, T., Micco, A., Carrell, T., Sharma, A., & Nicol, T. (1993). Mismatch negativity in school-age children to speech stimuli that are just perceptibly different. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 88, 123-130.
12. Kujala, T., Alho, K., Paavilainen, P., Summala, H.. & Näätänen, R. (1992). Neural plasticity in processing of sound location by the early blind: An event-related potential study. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 84, 469-472.
13. Lang, A. H., Eeorola, O., Korpilahti, P., Holopainen, I., Salo, S., & Aaltonen, O. (1995). Practical issues in the clinical application of mismatch negativity. Ear and Hearing, 16, 118-130.
14. Lang, A. H., Nyrke, T., Ek, M., Aaltonen, O., Raimo, I., & Näätänen, R. (1990). Pitch discrimination performance and auditive event-related-potentials. In C. H. M. Brunia, A. W. K. Gaillard & A. Kok (Eds.), Psychophysiological brain research (Vol. 1, pp. 294-298). Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.
15. Levänen, S., Ahonen, A., Hari, R., McEvoy L., & Sams, M. (1996). Deviant auditory stimuli activate human left and right auditory cortex differently. Cerebral Cortex, 6, 288-296.
16. Levänen, S., Hari, R., McEvoy, L., & Sams, M. (1993), Responses of the human auditory cortex to changes in one versus two stimulus features. Experimental Brain Research, 97, 177-183.
17. McCarthy, G., & Wood, C. C. (1985). Scalp distribution of event-related potentials: An ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 62, 203-208.
18. Näätänen, R. (1990). The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13, 201-288.
19. Näätänen, R. (1992). Attention and brain function. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Näätänen, R., Jiang, D., Lavikainen, J., Reinikainen, K., & Paavilainen, P. (1993). Event-related potentials reveal a memory trace for temporal features. NeuroReport, 5, 310-312.
21. Näätänen, R., Paavilainen, P., Alho, K., Reinikainen, K., & Sams, M. (1987). The mismatch negativity to intensity changes in an auditory stimulus sequence. In R. Johnson, Jr., J. W. Rohrbaugh, & R. Parasuraman (Eds.), Current trends in event related potential research (EEG suppl. 40, pp. 125-131). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
22. Näätänen, R., Paavilainen, P., Alho, K., Reinikainen, K., & Sams, M. (1989). Do event-related potentials reveal a mechanism of the auditory sensory memory in the human brain? Neuroscience Letters, 98, 217-221.
23. Näätänen, R., Schröger, E., Tervaniemi, M., Karakas, S., & Paavilainen, P. (1993). Development of memory trace for complex sound patterns in the human brain. NeuroReport, 4, 503-506.
24. Paavilainen, P., Alho, K., Reinikainen, K., Sams, M., & Näätänen, R. (1991). Right hemisphere dominance of different mismatch negativities. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 78, 466-479.
25. Paavilainen, P., Jiang, D., Lavikainen, J., & Näätänen, R. (1993). Stimulus duration and the sensory memory trace: An event-related potential study. Biological Psychology, 35, 139-152.
26. Paavilainen, P., Karlsson, M. L., Reinikainen, K., & Näätänen, R. (1989). Mismatch negativity to change in spatial location of an auditory stimulus. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 73, 129-141.
27. Pekkonen, E., Rinne, T., & Näätänen, R. (1995). Variability and replicability of mismatch negativity. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 96, 546-554.
28. Ritter, W., Deacon, D., Gomes, H., Javitt, D. C. & Vaughan, H. G. (1995). The mismatch negativity of event-related potentials as a probe of transient auditory memory: A review. Ear and Hearing, 16, 52-57.
29. Sams, M., Paavilainen, R. Alho, K., & Näätänen, R. (1985). Auditory frequency discrimination and event-related potentials. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 62, 437-448.
30. Schröger, E. (1994). Automatic detection of frequency change is invariant over a large intensity range. NeuroReport, 5, 825-828.
31. Schröger, E. (1995). Processing of auditory deviants with changes in one versus two stimulus dimensions. Psychophysiology, 32, 55-65.
32. Schröger, E. (1996). The influence of stimulus intensity and inter-stimulus interval on the detection of pitch and loudness changes. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 100, 517-526.
33. Schröger, E., Tervaniemi, M., & Näätänen, R. (1995). Time course of loudness in tone patterns is automatically represented by the human brain. Neuroscience Letters, 202, 117-120.
34. Schröger, E., & Wolff, C. (1997). Fast preattentive processing of location: A functional basis for selective listening in humans. Neuroscience Letters, 232, 5-8.
35. Tiitinen, H., May, P., Reinikainen, K., & Näätänen R. (1994). Attentive novelty detection in humans is governed by pre-attentive sensory memory. Nature, 372, 90-92.