Can event-related potentials be evoked by extra-cochlear stimulation and used for selection purposes in cochlear implantation?

Clinical Otolaryngology and Allied Sciences

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 432-438

  Makhdoum, M J A ^a   Hinderink, J B ^a   Snik, A F M ^a,b   Groenen, P ^a   Van Den Broek, P ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b Department of Otorhinolaryngology ^*  (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Extra cochlear implant; Intra cochlear implant; N1 P2; P300; Speech contrast; Tonal contrast

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EVOKED RESPONSE AUDIOMETRY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; DEAFNESS; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION TESTS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0031696209     PISSN: 03077772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2273.1998.00168.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. SPIES T.H., SNIK A.F.M., MENS L.H.M. et al. (1993) Preoperative electrical stimulation for cochlear implant selection. Acta Otolaryngol. (Stockh.) 113, 579-584
2. KILENY P.R., ZIMMERMAN-PHILLIPS S., KEMINK J.L. et al. (1991) Effects of preoperative electrical stimulability and historical factors on performance with multichannel cochlear implant. Ann. Otol. Rhino. Laryngol. 100, 563-568
3. VAN DIJK, J.E., VAN OLPHEN A.F. MENS L.H.M. et al. (1995) Predictive factors for success with a cochlear implant. Ann. Otol. Rhino. Laryngol. 104 (Suppl.), 196-198
4. WALTZMAN S.B., COHEN N.L., SHAPIRO W.H. et al. (1990) The prognostic value of round window electrical stimulation in cochlear implant patients. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 103, 102-106
5. BLAMEY P.J., PYMAN B.C., GORDON M. et al. (1992) Factors predicting postoperative sentence scores in postlinguistically deaf adult cochlear implant patients. Ann. Otol. Rhino. Laryngol. 101, 342-348
6. BATTMER R.D., GUPTA S.P., ALLUM-MECKLENBURG D.J. et al. (1995) Factors influencing cochlear implant perceptual performance in 132 adults. Ann. Otol. Rhino. Laryngol. 104 (Suppl.), 185-187
7. MEYER B., DRIRA M., GEGU D. et al. (1984) Results of the round window electrical stimulating in 460 cases of total deafness. Acta Otolaryngol. (Stockh.) 7 (Suppl.), 168-176
8. KILENY P.R., ZWOLAN T.A., ZIMMERINAN-PHILLIPS S. et al. (1994) Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response in paediatric patients with cochlear implants. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 120, 1083-1090
9. BROWN C.J. (1996) Using electrically evoked auditory potentials in the clinical management of cochlear implant candidates and recipients. Semin. Hear. 17, 389-401
10. KILENY P.R. & KEMINK J.L. (1987) Electrically evoked middle latency auditory potentials in cochlear implant candidates. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 113, 1072-1077
11. GROENEN P., SNIK A. & VAN DEN BROEK P. (1997) Electrically evoked auditory middle latency responses versus speech perception abilities in cochlear implant users. Audiology 36, 83-97
12. ABBAS P.J. & BROWN C.J. (1991) Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses: growth of response with current level. Hear Res. 51, 123-138
13. MAKHDOUM M.J.A., GROENEN P.A.P., SNIK A.F.M. et al. (1998) Intra- and interindividual correlations between auditory potentials and speech perception in cochlear implant users. Scand. Audiol. 27, 13-20
14. MICCO A.G., KRAUS N., KOCH D.B. et al. (1995) Speech-evoked cognitive P300 potentials in cochlear implant recipients. Am. J. Otol. 4, 514-520
15. GROENEN P.A.P., MAKHDOUM M.J.A., VAN DEN BRINK J.L. et al. (1996) The relation between electric auditory brain stem and cognitive responses and speech perception in cochlear implant users. Acta Otolaryngol. (Stockh.) 116, 785-790
16. KAGA K., KODERA K., HIROTA E. et al. (1991) P300 response to tones and speech sounds after cochlear implant: a case report. Laryngoscope 101, 905-907
17. OVIATT D.L. & KILENY P.R. (1991) Auditory event-related potentials elicited from cochlear implant recipients and hearing subjects. Am. J. Audiol. 1, 48-55
18. GROENEN P.A.P. (1997) Central auditory disorders. Unpublished thesis. Faculty of Medical Sciences. University of Nijmegen, the Netherlands
19. KILENY P.R. (1991) Use of electrophysiologic measures in the management of children with cochlear implants: brainstem, middle latency and cognitive (P300) responses. Am. J. Otol. 12 (Suppl.), 37-42
20. VAN DEN ABBEELE T., ORMEZZANO Y., FRACHET B. et al. (1990) Electrophysiologic studies in patients with cochlear implants. Am. Otolaryngol. Chir. Cervicofac. 107, 446-456
21. STALLER S.J., DOWELL R.C., BETTER A.L. et al. (1991) Perceptual abilities of children with the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant. Ear Hear. 12(Suppl.), 34-47
22. EYLES J.A., ALEKSY W.L. & BOYLE P.J. (1995) Performance changes in University College Hospital Royal National Institute for the Deaf single-channel cochlear implant users upgraded to the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant system. Ann. Otol. Rhino. Laryngol. 104, 263-265
23. HINDERINK J.B., Mens L.H.M., BROKX J.P.L. et al. (1995) Performance of prelingually and postlingually deaf patients using single-channel or multichannel cochlear implants. Laryngoscope 105, 618-622
24. FREUND R.J. & LITTELL R.C. (1981) SAS For Linear Models: a Guide to the ANOVA and GLM Procedures. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
25. SATTERTHWAITE F.W. (1946) An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. Biometrics Bull. 2, 110-114
26. KILENY P.R. & KRIPAL J.P. (1987) Test retest variability of auditory event-related potentials. Ear Hear. 8, 110-114