Kinetic epitope mapping of the chicken lysozyme·HyHEL-10 Fab complex: Delineation of docking trajectories

Protein Science

Volumn 7, Issue 9, 1998, Pages 1857-1867

  Taylor, Marc G ^a,c   Rajpal, Arvind ^b   Kirsch, Jack F ^a,b  

^a LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c SIEMENS CORPORATE RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Epitope mapping; Hen (chicken) egg white lysozyme; HyHEL 10; Monoclonal antibody; Protein protein interaction; Site directed mutagenesis; Transition state

Indexed keywords

ARGININE; ASPARTIC ACID; DOCKING PROTEIN; EGG WHITE; EPITOPE; IMMUNOGLOBULIN F(AB) FRAGMENT; LYSINE; LYSOZYME; MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY; MUTANT PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENZYME KINETICS; HEN; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SITE DIRECTED MUTAGENESIS;

EID: 0031694146     PISSN: 09618368     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pro.5560070902     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Altschuh D, Dubs M-C, Weiss E, Zeder-Lutz G, Van Regenmortel MHV. 1992. Determination of kinetic constants for the interaction between a monoclonal antibody and peptides using surface plasmon resonance. Biochemistry 31:6298-6304.
2. Bhat TN, Bentley GA, Boulot G, Greene MI, Tello D, Dall'Aqua W, Souchon H, Schwarz FP, Mariuzza RA, Poljak RJ. 1994. Bound water molecules and conformational stabilization help mediate an antigen-antibody association. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:1089-1093.
3. Braun PJ, Dennis S, Hofsteenge J, Stone SR. 1988. Use of site-directed mutagenesis to investigate the basis for the specificity of hirudin. Biochemistry 27:6517-6522.
4. Brouwer AC, Kirsch JF. 1982. Investigation of diffusion-limited rates of chymotrypsin reactions by viscosity variation. Biochemistry 21:1302-1307.
5. Cannon WR, Singleton SF, Benkovic SJ. 1996. A perspective on biological catalysis. Nat Struct Biol 3:821-833.
6. Carter PJ, Winter G, Wilkinson AJ, Fersht AR. 1984. The use of double mutants to detect structural changes in the active site of the tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase (Bacillus stearothermophilus). Cell 38:835-840.
7. Clackson T, Wells JA. 1995. A hot spot of binding energy in a hormone-receptor interface. Science 267:383-386.
8. Creighton TE. 1993. Proteins: Structures and molecular properties, 2nd ed. New York: W.H. Freeman & Company. p 4.
9. Dall'Acqua W, Goldman ER, Eisenstein E, Mariuzza RA. 1996. A mutational analysis of the binding of two different proteins to the same antibody. Biochemistry 35:9667-9676.
10. England P, Brégégère F, Bedouelle H. 1997. Energetic and kinetic contributions of contact residues of antibody D1.3 in the interaction with lysozyme. Biochemistry 36:164-172.
11. Fersht AR, Matouschek A, Serrano L. 1992. The folding of an enzyme. I. Theory of protein engineering analysis of stability and pathway of protein folding. J Mol Biol 224:771-782.
12. Foote J, Winter G. 1992. Antibody framework residues affecting the conformation of the hypervariable loops. J Mol Biol 224:487-499.
13. Friguet B, Djavadi-Ohaniance L, Goldberg ME. 1989. Polypeptide-antibody binding mechanism: Conformational adaptation investigated by equilibrium and kinetic analysis. Res Immunol 140:355-376.
14. Glaser RW, Hausdorf G. 1996. Binding kinetics of an antibody against HIV p24 core protein measured with real-time biomolecular interaction analysis suggest a slow conformational change in antigen p24. J Immunol Methods 189:1-14.
15. Goldman ER, Dall'Acqua W, Braden BC, Mariuzza RA. 1997. Analysis of binding interactions in an idiotope-antiidiotope protein-protein complex by double mutant cycles. Biochemistry 36:49-56.
16. Hendsch ZS, Tidor B. 1994. Do salt bridges stabilize proteins? A continuum electrostatic analysis. Protein Sci 3:211-226.
17. Horovitz A, Fersht AR. 1992. Co-operative interactions during protein folding. J Mol Biol 224:733-740.
18. Horton N, Lewis M. 1992. Calculation of the free energy of association for protein complexes. Protein Sci 1:169-181.
19. Ito W, Yasui H, Kurosawa Y. 1995. Mutations in the complementarity-determining regions do not cause differences in free energy during the process of formation of the activated complex between an antibody and the corresponding protein antigen. J Mol Biol 248:729-732.
20. Janin J. 1995. Elusive affinities. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 21:30-39.
21. Janin J. 1997. The kinetics of protein-protein recognition. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 28:153-161.
22. Janin J, Chothia C. 1990. The structure of protein-protein recognition sites. J Biol Chem 265:16027-16030.
23. Jencks WP. 1981. On the attribution and additivity of binding-energies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:4046-4050.
24. Jin L, Wells JA. 1994. Dissecting the energetics of an antibody-antigen interface by alanine shaving and molecular grafting. Protein Sci 3:2351-2357.
25. Julin DA, Kirsch JF. 1989. Kinetic isotope effect studies on aspartate amino-transferase: Evidence for a concerted 1,3 prototropic shift mechanism for the cytoplasmic isozyme and L-aspartate and dichotomy in mechanism. Biochemistry 28:3825-3833.
26. Kam-Morgan LNW, Smith-Gill SJ, Taylor MG, Zhang L, Wilson AC, Kirsch JK. 1993. High-resolution mapping of the HyHEL-10 epitope of chicken lysozyme by site-directed mutagenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:3958-3962.
27. Kozack RE, Subramanian S. 1993. Brownian dynamics simulations of molecular recognition in an antibody-antigen system. Protein Sci 2:915-926.
28. Malcolm BA, Rosenberg S, Corey MJ, Allen JS, deBaetselier A, Kirsch JF. 1989. Site-directed mutagenesis of the catalytic residues Asp-52 and Glu-35 of chicken egg white lysozyme. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:133-137.
29. Matouschek A, Serrano L, Fersht AR. 1992. The folding of an enzyme. IV. Structure of an intermediate in the refolding of barnase analysed by a protein engineering procedure. J Mol Biol 224:819-835.
30. Matsumura I, Kirsch JF. 1996. Is aspartate 52 essential for catalysis by chicken egg white lysozyme? The role of natural substrate-assisted hydrolysis. Biochemistry 35:1881-1889.
31. Nieba L, Krebber A, Plückthun A. 1996. Competition BIAcore for measuring true affinities: Large differences from values determined from binding kinetics. Anal Biochem 234:155-165.
32. Padlan EA, Silverton EW, Sheriff S, Cohen GH, Smith-Gill SJ, Davies DR. 1989. Structure of an antibody-antigen complex: Crystal structure of the HyHEL-10 Fab-lysozyme complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:5938-5942.
33. Rajpal A, Taylor MG, Kirsch JF. 1998. Qualitative evaluation of the complete chicken lysozyme epitope in the HyHEL-10 Fab complex: Free energies and kinetics. Protein Sci 7:1868-1874.
34. Raman CS, Jemmerson R, Nall BT, Allen MJ. 1992. Diffusion-limited rates for monoclonal antibody binding to cytochrome c. Biochemistry 31:10370-10379.
35. Ray AA. 1982. SAS User's guide: Basics, 1982 edition. Cary, North Carolina: SAS Institute.
36. Richards FM. 1974. The interpretation of protein structures: Total volume, group volume distributions and packing density. J Mol Biol 82:1-14.
37. Sadana A, Chen Z. 1996. Influence of non-specific binding on antigen-antibody binding kinetics for biosensor applications. Biosens Bioelectron 11:17-33.
38. Sancho J, Fersht AR. 1992. Dissection of an enzyme by protein engineering: The N and C-terminal fragments of barnase form a native-like complex with restored enzymic activity. J Mol Biol 224:741-747.
39. Sancho J, Meiering EM, Fersht AR. 1991. Mapping transition states of protein unfolding by protein engineering of ligand-binding sites. J Mol Biol 221:1007-1014.
40. Schreiber G, Fersht AR. 1995. Energetics of protein-protein interactions: Analysis of the barnase-barstar interface by single mutations and double mutant cycles. J Mol Biol 248:478-486.
41. Schuck P, Minton AP. 1996. Kinetic analysis of biosensor data: Elementary tests for self-consistency. Trends Biochem Sci 21:458-460.
42. Serrano L, Kellis JT Jr, Cann P, Matouschek A, Fersht AR. 1992a. The folding of an enzyme. II. Substructure of barnase and the contribution of different interactions to protein stability. J Mol Biol 224:783-804.
43. Serrano L, Matouschek A, Fersht AR. 1992b. The folding of an enzyme. III. Structure of the transition state for unfolding of barnase analysed by a protein engineering procedure. J Mol Biol 224:805-818.
44. Serrano L, Matouschek A, Fersht AR. 1992c. The folding of an enzyme. VI. The folding pathway of barnase: Comparison with theoretical models. J Mol Biol 224:847-859.
45. Shih P, Malcolm BA, Rosenberg S, Kirsch JF, Wilson AC. 1993. Reconstruction and testing of ancestral proteins. Methods Enzymol 224:576-590.
46. Shugar D. 1952. The measurement of lysozyme activity and the ultra-violet inactivation of lysozyme. Biochim Biophys Acta 8:302-309.
47. Sole K, Stockmayer WH. 1973. Kinetics of diffusion-controlled reaction between chemically asymmetric molecules. II. Approximate steady-state solution. Int J Chem Kinet 5:733-752.
48. Sophianopoulos AJ, Rhodes CK, Holcomb DN, Van Holde KE. 1962. Physical studies of lysozyme. I. Characterization. J Biol Chem 237:1107-1112.
49. Tsai CJ, Xu D, Nussinov R. 1997. Structural motifs at protein-protein interfaces: Protein cores versus two-state and three-state model complexes. Protein Sci 6:1793-1805.
50. Tsumoto K, Ogasahara K, Ueda Y, Watanabe K, Yutani K, Kamagai I. 1995. Role of tyr residues in the contact region of anti-lysozyme monoclonal antibody HyHEL-10 for antigen binding. J Biol Chem 270:18551-18557.
51. Tsumoto K, Ogasahara K, Ueda Y, Watanabe K, Yutani K, Kamagai I. 1996. Role of salt bridge formation in antigen-antibody interaction. J Biol Chem 271:32612-32616.
52. Van Oss CJ. 1995. Hydrophobic, hydrophilic and other interactions in epitope-paratope binding. Mol Immunol 32:199-211.
53. Wells JA. 1991. Systematic mutational analyses of protein-protein interfaces. Methods Enzymol 202:390-411.
54. Williams DC Jr, Benjamin DC, Poljak RJ, Rule GS. 1996. Global changes in amide hydrogen exchange rates for a protein antigen in complex with three different antibodies. J Mol Biol 257:866-876.