Principal component analysis of event-related potentials: Misallocation of variance revisited

Psychophysiology

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 597-606

  Achim, André ^a   Marcantoni, Walter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Event related potentials; Principal component analysis; Topographic component model

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NORMAL HUMAN; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SIMULATION; VARIANCE; WAVEFORM;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; EVOKED POTENTIALS; HUMANS; MEMORY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS;

EID: 0030766208     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1997.tb01746.x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Achim, A. (1995). Cerebral source localization paradigms: Spatiotemporal source modeling. Brain and Cognition, 27, 256-287.
2. Achim, A., & Bouchard, S. (in press). Toward a dynamic component model of event-related potentials. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 103.
3. Cardenas, V. A., Yingling, C. D., Jewett, D., & Fein, G. (1995). A multi-channel, model-free method for estimation of event-related potential amplitudes and its comparison with dipole source localization. Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology, 19, 88-98.
4. Carroll, J. D., & Chang, J. J. (1970). Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via a N-way generalization of "Eckart-Young" decomposition. Psychometrika, 35, 283-319.
5. Chapman, R. M., & McCrary, J. W. (1995). EP component identification and measurement by principal component analysis. Brain and Cognition, 27, 288-310.
6. Donchin, E., & Heffley, E. F. (1978). Multivariate analysis of event-related potential data: A tutorial review. In D. A. Otto (Ed.), Multidisciplinary perspectives in event-related brain potential research (pp. 555-572). Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
7. Field, A. S., & Graupe, D. (1991). Topographic component (parallel factor) analysis of multichannel evoked potentials: Practical issues in trilinear spatiotemporal decomposition. Brain Topography, 3, 407-423.
8. Glaser, E. M., & Ruchkin, D. S. (1976). Principles of neurobiological signal analysis. New York: Academic Press.
9. Harshman, R. A. (1970). Foundation of the PARAFAC procedure: Models and conditions for an "explanatory" multi-mode factor analysis. UCLA Working Paper in Phonetics, 16, 1-84.
10. Harshman, R. A., & Lundy, M. E. (1984a). The PARAFAC model for three-way factor analysis and multidimensional scaling. In H. G. Law, C. W. Snyder, Jr., J. A. Hattie, & R. P. McDonald (Eds.), Research methods for multimode data analysis (pp. 122-215). New York: Praeger.
11. Harshman, R. A., & Lundy, M. E. (1984b). Data preprocessing and the extended PARAFAC model. In H. G. Law, C. W. Snyder, Jr., J. A. Hattie, & R. P. McDonald (Eds.), Research methods for multimode data analysis (pp. 216-284). New York: Praeger.
12. Hunt, E. (1985). Mathematical models of event-related potentials. Psychophysiology, 22, 395-402.
13. John, E. R., Ruchkin, D. S., & Villega, H. (1964). Experimental background: Signal analysis and behavioral correlates of evoked potential configuration in cats. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 112, 362-420.
14. Lines, C. R., Rugg, M. D., & Milner, A. D. (1984). The effect of stimulus intensity on visual evoked potential estimates of interhemispheric transmission time. Experimental Brain Research, 57, 89-98.
15. Möcks, J. (1988a). Topographic components model for event-related potentials and some biophysical considerations. IEEE Transactions in Biomedical Engineering, BME35, 482-484.
16. Möcks, J. (1988b). Decomposing event-related potentials: A new topographic component model. Biological Psychology, 26, 199-215.
17. Möcks, J., & Verleger, R. (1986). Principal component analysis of event-related potentials: A note on misallocation of variance. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 65, 393-398.
18. Pham, T. D., & Möcks, J. (1992). Beyond principal component analysis: A trilinear decomposition model and least squares estimation. Psychometrika, 57, 203-215.
19. Turetsky, B., Raz, J., & Fein, G. (1990). Representation of multi-channel evoked potential data using a dipole component model of intracranial generators: Application to the auditory P300. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 76, 540-556.
20. Wood, C. C., & McCarthy, G. (1984). Principal component analysis of event-related potentials: Simulation studies demonstrate misallocation of variance across components. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 59, 249-260.
21. Zhang, Z., & Jewett, D. L. (1993). Insidious errors in dipole localization parameters at a single time point due to model misspecification of number of shells. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 88, 1-11.
22. Zhang, Z., Jewett, D. L., & Goodwill, G. (1994). Insidious errors in dipole parameters due to shell model misspecification using multiple time points. Brain Topography, 6, 283-298.