Quantum information is physical

Superlattices and Microstructures

Volumn 23, Issue 3-4, 1998, Pages 419-432

  DiVincenzo, David P ^a   Loss, Daniel ^b  

^a IBM T J WATSON RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Entanglement; Quantum computation; Quantum dots

Indexed keywords

CALCULATIONS; COMPUTERS; DATA PROCESSING; ERROR CORRECTION; GREEN'S FUNCTION; SEMICONDUCTOR QUANTUM DOTS;

QUANTUM COMPUTATION; QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT; QUANTUM ERROR CORRECTION;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 0031649894     PISSN: 07496036     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/spmi.1997.0520     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. R. Landauer, Is quantum-mechanically coherent computation useful?, in Proc. Drexel-4 Symposium on Quantum Nonintegrability - Quantum-Classical Correspondence, Philadelphia, PA, 8 September 1994 edited by D. H. Feng and B.-L. Hu, Boston, International Press, to be published).
2. R. Landauer, Information is Physical, in Proc. Workshop on Physics and Computation PhysComp '92 (Los Alamitos, IEEE Comp. Sci. Press, 1993) pp. 1-4.
3. A. Berthiaume, D. Deutsch, and R. Jozsa, The stabilisation of quantum computation, Proc. Workshop on Physics and Computation PhysComp '92 (Los Alamitos, IEEE Comp. Sci. Press, 1993) pp. 60-62.
4. C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, S. Popescu, B. Schumacher, J. A. Smolin, and W. K. Wootters, Purification of noisy entanglement and faithful teleportation via noisy channels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 722 (1996).
5. C. H. Bennett, D. P. DiVincenzo, J. A. Smolin, and W. K. Wootters, Mixed-state entanglement and quantum error correction, Phys. Rev. A54, 3824 (1996); see http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/9604024.
6. C. H. Bennett, D. P. DiVincenzo, J. A. Smolin, and W. K. Wootters, Mixed-state entanglement and quantum error correction, Phys. Rev. A54, 3824 (1996); see http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/9604024.
7. P. W. Shor, Scheme for reducing decoherence in quantum computer memory, Phys. Rev. A52, 2493 (1995).
8. A. M. Steane, Error correcting codes in quantum theory, Phys. Rev. Lett 77, 793 (1996).
9. W. K. Wootters and W. H. Zurek, Nature (London) 299, 802 (1982).
10. C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, and N. D. Mermin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 557 (1992).
11. E. Schrödinger, Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik, Naturwissenschaften 23, 807-812; 823-828; 844-849 (1935). Translation: J. D. Trimmer, The present situation in quantum mechanics: a translation of Schrödinger's 'cat paradox' paper, Proc. Amer. Phil. Soc. 124, 323 (1980).
12. E. Schrödinger, Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik, Naturwissenschaften 23, 807-812; 823-828; 844-849 (1935). Translation: J. D. Trimmer, The present situation in quantum mechanics: a translation of Schrödinger's 'cat paradox' paper, Proc. Amer. Phil. Soc. 124, 323 (1980).
13. E. Schrödinger, Discussion of probability relations between separated systems, Cambridge Phil. Soc. 31, 555 (1935); E. Schrödinger, Probability relations between separated systems, ibid., 32, 446 (1936).
14. E. Schrödinger, Discussion of probability relations between separated systems, Cambridge Phil. Soc. 31, 555 (1935); E. Schrödinger, Probability relations between separated systems, ibid., 32, 446 (1936).
15. R. Laflamme, C. Miquel, J. P. Paz, and W. H. Zurek, Perfect quantum error correction code, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 198 (1996).
16. See D. P. DiVincenzo and A. Peres, Quantum code words contradict local realism, Phys. Rev. A55, 4089 (1997).
17. See D. P. DiVincenzo, J. A. Smolin, and P. W. Shor, Quantum channel capacity of very noisy channels, Phys. Rev. A, in press; see http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/9706061.
18. See D. P. DiVincenzo, J. A. Smolin, and P. W. Shor, Quantum channel capacity of very noisy channels, Phys. Rev. A, in press; see http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/9706061.
19. D. P. DiVincenzo and P. W. Shor, Fault-tolerant error correction with efficient quantum codes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3260 (1996); see http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/9605031.
20. D. P. DiVincenzo and P. W. Shor, Fault-tolerant error correction with efficient quantum codes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3260 (1996); see http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/9605031.
21. E. Knill and R. Laflamme, Theory of quantum error correcting codes, Phys. Rev. A55, 900 (1997); see http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/9604034.
22. E. Knill and R. Laflamme, Theory of quantum error correcting codes, Phys. Rev. A55, 900 (1997); see http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/9604034.
23. D. Gottesman, Class of quantum error correcting codes saturating the quantum Hamming bound, Phys. Rev. A54, 1862 (1996); see http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/9604038.
24. D. Gottesman, Class of quantum error correcting codes saturating the quantum Hamming bound, Phys. Rev. A54, 1862 (1996); see http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/9604038.
25. A. R. Calderbank, E. M. Rains, P. W. Shor, and N. J. A. Sloane, Quantum error correction and orthogonal geometry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 405 (1997); see http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/9605005.
26. A. R. Calderbank, E. M. Rains, P. W. Shor, and N. J. A. Sloane, Quantum error correction and orthogonal geometry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 405 (1997); see http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/9605005.
27. P. W. Shor, Fault-tolerant quantum computation, in Proc. 37th Symposium on the Foundations of Computer Science (Los Alamitos, IEEE Computer Society Press, 1996), pp. 56-65; see http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/9605011.
28. P. W. Shor, Fault-tolerant quantum computation, in Proc. 37th Symposium on the Foundations of Computer Science (Los Alamitos, IEEE Computer Society Press, 1996), pp. 56-65; see http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/9605011.
29. J. Preskill, Reliable quantum computers, Proc. R. Soc. Lond., in press; see http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/9705031.
30. J. Preskill, Reliable quantum computers, Proc. R. Soc. Lond., in press; see http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/9705031.
31. P. Benioff, Quantum mechanical Hamiltonian models of Turing machines, J. Stat. Phys. 29, 515 (1982).
32. R. Feynman, Quantum-mechanical computers, Found. Phys. 16, 507 (1986).
33. D. Deutsch, Quantum computational networks, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A425, 73 (1989).
34. P. W. Shor, Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete log and factoring, in Proc. 35th Annual Symposium on the Foundations of Computer Science (Los Alamitos, IEEE Computer Society, 1993), p. 124.
35. S. Lloyd, A potentially realizable quantum computer, Science 261, 1589 (1993); S. Lloyd, Envisioning a quantum supercomputer, Science 263, 695 (1994).
36. S. Lloyd, A potentially realizable quantum computer, Science 261, 1589 (1993); S. Lloyd, Envisioning a quantum supercomputer, Science 263, 695 (1994).
37. D. P. DiVincenzo, Two-bit gates are universal for quantum computation, Phys. Rev. A51, 1015 (1995); see http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/cond-mat/9407022.
38. D. P. DiVincenzo, Two-bit gates are universal for quantum computation, Phys. Rev. A51, 1015 (1995); see http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/cond-mat/9407022.
39. This work started with J. I. Cirac and P. Zoller, Quantum computations with cold trapped ions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4091 (1995).
40. A. Ekert, Quantum Computation, in Atomic Physics 14 - 14th International Conference on Atomic Physics, Boulder, CO, 1994, AIP Conference Proceedings 323 (New York, AIP Press, 1995) eds D. J. Wineland, C. E. Wieman, S. J. Smith, p. 450.
41. A. Ekert, Quantum Computation, in Atomic Physics 14 - 14th International Conference on Atomic Physics, Boulder, CO, 1994, AIP Conference Proceedings 323 (New York, AIP Press, 1995) eds D. J. Wineland, C. E. Wieman, S. J. Smith, p. 450.
42. D. P. DiVincenzo, Topics in Quantum Computers, in Mesoscopic Electron Transport, Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute on Mesoscopic Electron Transport, Curacao, June 24-July 6, 1996, edited by G. Schoen (Kluwer, 1997) See http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/cond-mat/9612126.
43. D. Loss and D. P. DiVincenzo, Quantum computation with quantum dots, Phys. Rev. A, 57, 210 (1998). See http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/cond-mat/9701055.
44. D. Loss and D. P. DiVincenzo, Quantum computation with quantum dots, Phys. Rev. A, 57, 210 (1998). See http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/cond-mat/9701055.
45. A. Yu. Kitaev, Fault tolerant quantum computation by anyons, http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/9707021.
46. N. A. Gershenfeld and I. L. Chuang, Bulk spin resonance quantum computation, Science 275, 350 (1997).
47. A good source for discussion of general progress in the ion-trap computer may be found in R. J. Hughes et al., The Los Alamos trapped ion quantum computer experiment, to be published in Fortschritte der Physik; see http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/9708050.
48. A good source for discussion of general progress in the ion-trap computer may be found in R. J. Hughes et al., The Los Alamos trapped ion quantum computer experiment, to be published in Fortschritte der Physik; see http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/9708050.
49. One experiment which features this capability is C. Livermore et al., The Coulomb blockade in coupled quantum dots, Science 274, 1332 (1996).
50. J. M. Kikkawa, I. P. Smorchkova, N. Samarth, and D. D. Awschalom, Room-temperature spin memory in two-dimensional electron gases, Science 277, 1284 (1997).
51. S. Tarucha, D. G. Austin, T. Honda, R. J. van der Hage, and L. P. Kouwenhoven, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3613 (1996).
52. G. Burkard, D. P. DiVincenzo, and D. Loss, in preparation.