Models of job performance ratings: An examination of ratee race, ratee gender, and rater level effects

Human Performance

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 103-119

  Pulakos, Elaine D ^a   Schmitt, Neal ^b   Chan, David ^b  

^a Pers Decisions Research Institutes   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2842587208     PISSN: 08959285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327043hup0902_1     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Borman, W. C. (1974). The rating of individuals in organizations: An alternate approach. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 12, 105-124.
2. Borman, W. C., White, L. A., & Dorsey, D. W. (1995). Effects of ratee task performance and interpersonal factors on supervisor and peer performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 168-177.
3. Borman, W. C., White, L. A., Pulakos, E. D., & Oppler, S. H. (1991). Models of supervisory job performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 863-872.
4. Cooper, W. H. (1981). Ubiquitous halo. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 218-244.
5. DeNisi, A. S., Cafferty, T. P., & Meglino, B. M. (1984). A cognitive view of the performance appraisal process: A model and research proposition. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 33, 360-369.
6. Feldman, J. M. (1981). Beyond attribution theory: Cognitive processes in performance appraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 127-148.
7. Guion, R. M. (1983). Comments on Hunter. In F. Landy, S. Zedeck, & J. Cleveland (Eds.), Performance measurement and theory (pp. 267-275). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
8. Helms, J. E. (1992). Why is there no study of cultural equivalence in standardized cognitive ability testing? American Psychologist, 47, 1083-1101.
9. Hunter, J. E. (1983). A causal analysis of cognitive ability, job knowledge, job performance, and supervisor ratings. In F. Landy, S. Zedeck, & J. Cleveland (Eds.), Performance measurement and theory (pp. 257-266). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
10. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
11. Kraiger, K., & Ford, J. K. (1985). A meta-analysis of rater race effects in performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 56-65.
12. Landy, F. J., & Farr, J. L. (1980). Performance rating. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 72-107.
13. Motowidlo, S. J., Dunnette, M. D., & Carter, G. W. (1990). An alternative selection procedure: The low fidelity simulation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 640-647.
14. Mumford, M. D. (1993). Rationally-keyed biographical data items for constructs related to sales performance. Unpublished manuscript, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.
15. Murphy, K. R., Balzer, W. K., Lockhart, M. C., & Eisenman, E. J. (1985). Effects of previous performance on evaluations of present performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 72-84.
16. Nathan, B. R., & Lord, R. G. (1983). Cognitive categorization and dimensional schemata: A process approach to studying halo in performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 102-114.
17. Oppler, S. H., Campbell, J. P., Pulakos, E. D., & Borman, W. C. (1992). Three approaches to the investigation of subgroup bias in performance measurement: Review, results, and conclusions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 201-217.
18. Owens, W. A., Glennon, J. R., & Albright, L. E. (1966). A catalog of life history items. Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.
19. Pulakos, E. D., White, L. A., Oppler, S. H., & Borman, W. C. (1989). Examination of race and sex effects on performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 770-780.
20. Rothstein, H. R. (1990). Interrater reliability of job performance ratings: Growth to asymptote level with increasing opportunity to observe. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 322-327.
21. Sackett, P. R., & DuBois, C. L. Z. (1991) Rater-ratee race effects on performance evaluations: Challenging meta-analytic conclusions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 873-877.
22. Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., & Outerbridge, A. N. (1986). Impact of job experience and ability on job knowledge, work sample performance, and supervisory ratings of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 432-439.
23. Skinner, J., & Ree, M. J. (1987). Air Force Officer Qualifying Test (AFOQT): Item and factor analysis of Form O (AFHRL-TR-86-68). Brooks Air Force Base, TX: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory, Manpower and Personnel Division.
24. Smith, P., & Kendall, L. M. (1963). Retranslation of expectations: An approach to the construction of unambiguous anchors for rating scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 47, 149-155.
25. Sternberg, R. J. (1988). The triarchic mind: A new theory. New York: Viking.
26. Sternberg, R. J., Wagner, R. W., & Okagaki, L. (1993). Practical intelligence: The nature and role of tacit knowledge at work and school. In H. Reese & J. Puckett (Eds.), Advances in lifespan development (pp. 195-227). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
27. Tsui, A. S., & Ohlott, P. (1988). Multiple assessment of managerial effectiveness: Interrater agreement and consensus in effectiveness models. Personnel Psychology, 41, 779-803.
28. Wagner, R. W., & Sternberg, R. J. (1986). Tacit knowledge and intelligence in the everyday world. In R. J. Sternberg & R. W. Wagner (Eds.), Nature and origins of competence in the everyday world (pp. 52-83). New York: Cambridge University Press.
29. Zedeck, S., Imparto, N., Krausz, M., & Oleno, T. (1974). Development of behaviorally anchored rating scales as a function of organizational level. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 249-252.