Isotropie visual field effect on spatial orientation and egocentric localization

Spatial Vision

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 261-278

  Poquin, Didier ^a   Ohlmann, Theophile ^b   Barraud, Pierre Alain ^a  

^a CENTRE DE RECHERCHES   (France)

^b UNIV GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; GRAVITY; HUMAN; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; VISUAL FIELD;

ADULT; FEMALE; GRAVITATION; HUMANS; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL FIELDS;

LIGHT; OPTICAL SYSTEMS; OPTICS; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY;

EGOCENTRIC LOCALIZATION; SPATIAL ORIENTATION;

VISION;

EID: 0031596918     PISSN: 01691015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/156856898X00022     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Babler, T. G. and Ebenholtz, S. M. (1989). Effects of peripheral circular contours on dynamic spatial orientation. Percept. Psychophys. 45, 307-314.
2. Blake, R., Camisa, J. and Antonetti, O. (1976). Binocular depth discrimination depends on orientation. Percept. Psychophys,20, 113-118.
3. Brenet, F. and Luyat, M. (1995). Frame anisotropy: A problem of individual validity. Paper presented at Posture and Gait: from Representation to Control. CNRS, Marseille, France.
4. Cohen, M. M., Ebenholtz, S M. and Linder, B J. (1995). Effects of optical pitch on oculomotor control and the perception of target elevation Percept. Psychophys, 57, 433-440.
5. Dilorenzo, J. D. and Rock, I. (1982). The rod-and-frame effect as a function of the righting of the frame. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Performance 8, 536-546.
6. Ebenholtz, S. M. (1977). Determinants of the rod and frame effect: The role of retinal size. Percept. Psychophys. 22, 531-538.
7. Ebenholtz, S. M. and Walchli, R. M. (1965). Stereoscopic thresholds as a function of head-and object-orientation. Vision Res. 5, 455-461.
8. Ebenholtz, S. M. and Callan, J. W. (1980). Modulation of the rod and frame effect retinal angle vs apparent size. Psychol. Res. 42, 327-334.
9. Ebenholtz, S. M. and Glaser, G. W. (1982). Absence of depth processing in the large-frame rod-and-frame effect. Percept. Psychophys. 32, 134-140.
10. Goodenough, D. R., Oltman, P. K., Sigman, E., Rosso, J. and Mertz, H. (1979). Orientation contrast effects in the rod-and-frame test. Percept. Psychophys. 25, 419-424.
11. Goodenough, D. R., Cox, P. W., Sigman, E. and Strawderman, W. E. (1985). A cognitive-style conception of the field-dependence dimension. Curr: Psychol. Cogn. 5, 687-705.
12. Goodenough, D. R., Oltman, P K. and Cox, P. W. (1987). The nature of individual differences in field dependence. J. Res. Personality 21, 81-99.
13. Guerraz, M., Poquin, D. and Ohlmann, T. (1998). The role of head centric spatial reference with a static and kinetic visual interference. Percept. Psychophys. (in press).
14. Howard, I. P. (1986). The perception of posture, self-motion and the visual vertical. In: Handbook of Perception and Human Performance. Vol. I: Sensory Processes and Perception. K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman and J. P. Thomas (Eds). Wiley, New York, pp. 18.1-18.61.
15. Kleinhans, J. L. (1970). Perception of spatial orientation in sloped, slanted and tilted visual fields. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Rutgers University of New Jersey.
16. Kleint, H. (1936). Versuche uber die wahrnehmug. Zeischrift für Psychologie 138, 1-34
17. Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of Gestalt Psychology. Roulledge and Kegan Paul, London.
18. Kumar, T. (1988). Local and global aspects of stereopsis Unpublished PhD dissertation in Physics. University of California, Berkeley.
19. Kumar, T. and Glaser, D. A. (1992). Shape analysis and stereopsis for human depth perception. Vision Res. 32, 499-512.
20. Li, W. and Matin, L. (1995). Differences in influence between pitched-from-vertical and slanted-from-frontal horizontal lines on egocenlric localization Percept. Psychophys. 57, 71-83.
21. Luyat, M., Ohlmann, T. and Barraud, P. A. (1997). Subjective vertical and postural activity. Acta Psychol. 95, 181-193.
22. Matin, L and Fox, C. R. (1989). Visually perceived eye level and perceived elevation of objects: linearly additive influences from visual field pitch and from gravity. Vision Res. 29, 315-324.
23. Matin, L and Li, W. (1992) Visually perceived eye level: changes induced by a pitched-irom-vertical 2-line visual field J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Performance 18, 257-289.
24. Matin, L. and Li, W. (1994). Spatial summation among parallel lines across wide separation (50°) spatial localization and the great circle model Vision Res. 34, 2577-2598.
25. Matin, L. and Li, W. (1995). Multimodal basis for egocentric spatial localization and orientation. J. Vestibular Res. 6, 499-518.
26. Mitchison, G. J. and Westheimer, G. (1984). The perception of depth in simple figures Vision Res. 24, 1063-1073.
27. Nelson, J. I. (1977). The plasticity of correspondence: After-effects, illusions and horopter shifts in depth perception. J. Theoretical Biology 66, 203-266.
28. Poquin, D., Guerraz, M., Ohlmann, T., Marendaz, C., Brenet, F. and Raphel, C. (1995). Visual interference, Head-tilt and Aubert-Effect. Curr. Psychol. Cogn. 14, 231-253.
29. Singer, G., Purcell, A. T and Austin, M. (1970) The effect of structure and degree of tilt on the tilted room illusion. Percept. Psychophys. 7, 250-252.
30. Spinelli, D., Antonucci, G., Goodenough, D.R. and Pizzamigglio, L. (1991). Psychophysiological mechanisms underlying the rod and frame illusion. In: Field Dependence-Independence Cognitive Style Across the Life Span, S. Wapner and M. J. Demick (Eds). Laurence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 37-60.
31. Stoper, A. E. and Cohen, M. M. (1986). Judgements of eye level in light and in darkness. Percept. Psychophys. 40, 311-316.
32. Stoper, A. E. and Cohen, M. M. (1989). Effects of structured visual environments on apparent eye level Percept. Psychophys. 46, 469-475.
33. Stoper, A. E. and Cohen, M M. (1991). Optical, gravitational and kinaesthetic determinants of judged eye level In: Pictorial Communication in Virtual and Real Environments. S. R. Ellis (Ed.). Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 390-403.
34. Streibel, M. J., Barnes, R. D., Julness, J. D. and Ebenholtz, S. M. (1980). Determinants of the rod and frame effect: Role of organization and subjective contour. Percept Psychophys. 27, 136-140.
35. Welch, R. B. and Post, R. B. (1996). Accuracy and adaptation of reaching and pointing in pitched visual environments. Percept Psychophys. 58, 383-389.
36. Wertheimer, M. (1912). Experimentelle Studien ber das Sehen von Bewegung. Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorganen 61, 161-265
37. Witkin, H. A. and Asch, S. (1948). Studies in space orientation: IV. Further experiments on perception of the upright with displaced visual fields. J. Exp. Psychol. 38, 762-782.
38. Witkin, H. A., Dyk, R. B., Faterson, H. F., Goodenough, D. R. and Karp, S. A. (1962). Psychological Differentiation. Wiley, New York.