Subjective vertical and postural activity

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 95, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 181-193

  Luyat, Marion ^a   Ohlmann, Théophile ^a   Barraud, Pierre Alain ^b  

^a UNIV GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

^b CENTRE DE RECHERCHES   (France)

Author keywords

Posture; Rod and frame test; Spatial perception

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BODY POSTURE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; SUPINE POSITION; TOOTH OCCLUSION;

HUMANS; POSTURE; SPACE PERCEPTION; SUPINE POSITION; VERTICAL DIMENSION;

EID: 0031066090     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0001-6918(96)00015-7     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Amblard, B., J. Crémieux, A.R. Marchand and A. Carblanc, 1985. Lateral orientation and stabilization of human stance: Static versus dynamic cues. Experimental Brain Research 61, 21-37.
2. Aubert, H., 1861. Eine scheinbare bedeutende Drehung von Objekten bei Neigung des Kopfes nach rechts oder links [A seemingly significant object rotation by leaning the body to the right or to the left]. Virkows Archivs 20, 381-393.
3. Bauermeister, M., 1964. Effect of body tilt on apparent verticality, apparent body position and their relation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 67, 142-147.
4. Brown, J.L., 1961. Orientation to the vertical during water immersion. Aerospace Medicine 32, 209-217.
5. Cohen, J., 1977. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.
6. Corroyer, D. and H. Rouanet, 1994. Sur l'importance des effets et ses indicateurs dans l'analyse statistique des données [About the size of effects and their indicators for the statistical analysis of data]. L'Année Psychologique 94, 607-624.
7. Curthoys, I.S. and N.J. Wade, 1990. A balanced view of otolithic function. Psychological Review 97, 132-134.
8. Ebenholtz, S.M. and G.W. Glaser, 1982. Absence of depth processing in the rod and frame effect. Perception and Psychophysics 32, 134-140.
9. Gibson, E.J., 1979. The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
10. Gurfinkel, V.S. and Y.S. Levick, 1991. 'Perceptual and automatic aspects of the postural body scheme'. In: J. Paillard (Ed.), Brain and space (pp. 147-162). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Harris, C.W., 1974. Beware of the straight-ahead shifts, a nonperceptual change in experiments on adaptation to displaced vision. Perception 3, 461-476.
12. Howard, I.P., 1982. Human visual orientation. London: Wiley.
13. Mann, C.W., 1952. Visual factors in the perception of verticality. Journal of Experimental Psychology 44, 460-464.
14. Massion, J., 1994. Postural control system. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 4, 877-882.
15. Mittelstaedt, H., 1983. A new solution to the problem of the subjective vertical. Naturwissenschaften 70, 272-281.
16. Mittelstaedt, H., 1992. 'Somatic versus vestibular gravity reception in man'. In: B. Cohen, D.L. Tomko and F. Guedry (Eds.). Sensing and controlling motion, vestibular and sensori-motor function (pp. 124-139). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
17. Nelson, J.G., 1968. Effect of water immersion and body position upon perception of the gravitational vertical. Aerospace Medicine 39, 806-811.
18. Ohlmann, T. and C. Marendaz, 1991. 'Vicarious processes involved in selection/control of frames of reference and spatial aspects of field dependence-independence'. In: S. Wapner and J. Detnick (Eds.), Field dependence-independence, cognitive style across the life span (pp. 106-129). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Oltman, P.K., 1968. A portable rod and frame apparatus. Perceptual and Motor Skills 26, 503-506.
20. Paillard, J., 1974. 'Le traitement des informations spatiales' [Spatial information processing]. In: Association de Psychologie Scientifique de Langue Française (Ed.), De l'espace corporel à l'espace écologique (pp. 7-54). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
21. Paillard, J., 1982. 'Le corps et ses langages d'espace. Nouvelles contributions psychophysiologiques à l'étude du schéma corporel' [The body and its spatial langage. New psychophysiological contributions to the study of body schema]. In: E. Jeddi (Ed.), Le corps en psychiatrie (pp. 53-59). Paris: Masson.
22. Poquin, D., T. Ohlmann, P.A. Barraud and V. Bazin, 1993. Pitch, roll and combined pitch-roll frame effects in visual subjective vertical. Perception 22, 125a.
23. Riccio, G.E. and T.A. Stoffregen, 1990. Gravito-inertial force versus the direction of balance in the perception and control of orientation. Psychological Review 97, 135-137.
24. Riccio, G.E., E.J. Martin and T.A. Stoffregen, 1992. The role of balance dynamics in the active perception of orientation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 18, 624-644.
25. Roll, J.-P., R. Roll and J.-L. Velay, 1991. 'Proprioception as a link between body space and extra-personal space'. In: J. Paillard (Ed.), Brain and space (pp. 112-132). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Rosenthal, R. and D.B. Rubin, 1994. The counternull value of an effect size: A new statistic. Psychological Science 5, 329-334.
27. Ross, H.E., S.D. Crickmar, N.V. Sills and E.P. Owen, 1969. Orientation to the vertical in free divers. Aerospace Medicine 40, 728-732.
28. Stoffregen, T.A. and G.E. Riccio, 1988. An ecological theory of orientation and the vestibular system. Psychological Review 95, 3-14.
29. Witkin, H.A., H.B. Lewis, M. Hertzman, K. Machover, P. Bretnall Meissner and S. Wapner, 1954. Personality through perception. An experimental and clinical study. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
30. Young, L.R., 1984. 'Perception of the body in space: Mechanisms'. In: I. Smith (Ed.), Handbook of physiology - The nervous system (Vol. 3, pp. 1023-1066). New York: Academic Press.