The role of head-centric spatial reference with a static and kinetic visual disturbance

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 60, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 287-295

  Guerraz, Michel ^a   Poquin, Didier ^b   Ohlmann, Théophile ^a  

^a UNIV GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

^b CENTRE DE RECHERCHES   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BODY POSTURE; DARK ADAPTATION; FEMALE; GRAVITY; HEAD MOVEMENT; HUMAN; KINESTHESIA; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SEX DIFFERENCE; VISUAL ILLUSION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; DARK ADAPTATION; FEMALE; GRAVITATION; HEAD MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; KINESTHESIS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; POSTURE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SEX FACTORS;

EID: 0031992791     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03206037     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. AMBLARD, B., CRÉMIEUX, J., MARCHAND, A. R., & CARBLANC, A. (1985). Lateral orientation and stabilisation of human stance: Static versus dynamic visual cues. Experimental Brain Research, 32, 21-37.
2. BABLER, T. G., & EBENHOLTZ, S. M. (1989). Effects of peripheral circular contours on dynamic spatial orientation. Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 307-314.
3. BAUERMEISTER, M. (1964). Effect of body tilt on apparent vertically, apparent body position and their relation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 142-147.
4. BISCHOF, N. (1974). Optic vestibular orientation to the vertical. In H. H. Kornhuber (Ed.), Handbook of sensory physiology (Vol. 6, Pt. 2, pp. 155-190). New York: Springer-Verlag.
5. DAY, R. H., & WADE, N. J. (1969). Mechanisms involved in visual orientation constancy. Psychological Bulletin, 1, 33-42.
6. DICHGANS, J., DIENER, H. C., & BRANDT, T. (1974). Optokineticgraviceptive interaction in different head positions. Acta Otolaryngologica, 78, 213-221.
7. DICHGANS, J., HELD, R., YOUNG, L. R., & BRANDT, T. (1972). Moving visual scenes influences the apparent direction of gravity. Science, 178, 1217-1219.
8. DIJKSTRA, T. M., GIELEN, C. C., & MELIS, B. J. (1992). Postural responses to stationary and moving scenes as a function of distance to the scene. Human Movement Science, 11, 195-203.
9. DILORENZO, J. R., & ROCK, I. (1982). The rod and frame effect as a function of the righting of the frame. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 8, 536-546.
10. EBENHOLTZ, S. M. (1985). Blur-modulated orientation perception in the rod-and-frame task. Perception & Psychophysics, 37, 109-113.
11. HELD, R., DICHGANS, J., & BAUER, J. (1975). Characteristics of moving visual scenes influencing spatial orientation. Vision Research, 15, 357-365.
12. HOWARD, I. P. (1982). Human visual orientation. London: Wiley.
13. HOWARD, I. P. (1986).The perception of posture, self motion, and the visual vertical. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufmann, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (pp. 18.1-18.61). New York: Wiley.
14. HUGHES, P. C. (1973). The influence of the visual field upon the visual vertical in relation to ocular torsion of the eye. Dissertation Abstracts International, 33, 4686B.
15. LEIBOWITZ, H. W., RODEMER, C. S., & DICHGANS, J. (1979). The independence of dynamic spatial orientation from luminance and refractive error. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 75-79.
16. LUYAT, M., OHLMANN, T., & BARRAUD, P. A. (1997). Subjective vertical and postural activity. Acta Psychologica, 95, 181-193.
17. MERKER, B. H., & HELD, R. (1981). Eye torsion and the apparent horizon under head tilt and visual field rotation. Vision Research, 21, 543-547.
18. MITTELSTAEDT, H. (1983a). A new solution to the problem of the subjective vertical. Naturwissenschatften, 70, 272-281.
19. MITTELSTAEDT, H. (1983b). Towards understanding the flow of information between objective and subjective space. In F. Huber & H. Markl (Eds.), Neuroethology & behavioral physiology (pp. 382-402). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
20. MITTELSTAEDT, H. (1986). The subjective vertical as a function of visual and extraretinal cues. Acta Psychologica, 63, 63-88.
21. MITTELSTAEDT, H. (1991).The role of the otoliths in perception of the orientation of self and world to the vertical. Zoological Journal of Physiology, 95, 419-425.
22. NYBORG, H. (1974). A method for analysing performance in the rod and frame test: I. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 15, 119-123.
23. O'BRIEN, R. G. (1981). A simple test for variance effect in experimental designs. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 570-574.
24. OLTMAN, P. K. (1968). A portable rod-and-frame apparatus. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 26, 503-506.
25. PAILLARD, J., & AMBLARD, B. (1985). Static versus kinetic cues for the processing of spatial relationships. In D. J. Ingle, M. Jeannerod, & D. N. Lee (Eds.), Brain mechanisms and spatial vision (pp. 299-330). The Hague: Nijhoff.
26. PARKER, D. E., POSTON, R. L., & GULLEDGE, W. L. (1983). Spatial orientation: Visual-vestibular-somatic interaction. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 139-146.
27. POQUIN, D., GUERRAZ, M., OHLMANN, T., MARENDAZ, C., BRENET, F., & RAPHEL, C. (1995). Visual disturbance, head tilt and Aubert effect. Current Psychology of Cognition, 14, 231-253.
28. SCHONE, H. (1964). On the role of gravity in human spatial orientation. Aerospatial Medicine, 35, 764-772.
29. SPINELLI, D., ANTONUCCI, G., GOODENOUGH, D. R., & PIZZAMIGLIO, L. (1991). Psychophysiological mechanisms underlying the rod-and-frame illusion. In S. Wapner & J. Demick (Eds.), Bio-psycho-social factors in cognitive style (pp. 37-60). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. WADE, N. J. (1968). Visual orientation during and after lateral head, body, and trunk tilt. Perception & Psychophysics, 3, 215-219.
31. WADE, N.J. (1969). The effect of stimulus line variations on visual orientation with head upright and tilted. Australian Journal of Psychology, 21, 177-185.
32. WITKIN, H. A., & ASCH, S. (1948a). Studies in space orientation: III. Perception of the upright in the absence of visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 603-614.
33. WITKIN, H. A., & ASCH, S. (1948b). Studies in space orientation: IV. Further experiments on perception of the upright with visual fields. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 762-782.
34. YARDLEY, L. (1990). Contribution of somatosensory information to perception of the visual vertical with body tilt and rotating visual field. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 131-134.
35. YOUNG, L. R. (1984). Perception of the body in space; mechanisms. In I. Darian Smith (Ed.), Handbook of physiology: Sec. 1. The nervous system: Vol. 3. Sensory processes (Pt., 2, pp. 1023-1066). Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Society.