Folding proteins with a simple energy function and extensive conformational searching

Protein Science

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 254-261

  Yue, Kaizhi ^a   Dill, Ken A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

conformational search; energy potential; protein folding; structure prediction

Indexed keywords

APAMIN; MELITTIN; PANCREAS POLYPEPTIDE;

ALGORITHM; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; COMPUTER MODEL; COMPUTER PROGRAM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING;

EID: 0030048675     PISSN: 09618368     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pro.5560050209     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Aho A, Hopcroft J, Ullman J. 1974. The design and analysis of computer algorithms. New York: Addison-Wesley.
2. Anfinsen CB. 1973. Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. Science 181:223-230.
3. Baker EN, Hubbard RE. 1984. Hydrogen bonding in globular proteins. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 44:97-197.
4. Boczko EM, Brooks CL. 1995. First-principles calculation of the folding free energy of a three-helix bundle protein. Science 269:393-396.
5. Cantor CR, Schimmel PR. 1980. Biophysical chemistry. New York: Freeman.
6. Covell DG. 1992. Folding protein α-carbon chains into compact forms by Monte Carlo methods. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 14:409-420.
7. Covell DG. 1994. Lattice model simulations of polypeptide chain folding. J Mol Biol 235:1032-1043.
8. De la Cruz X, Reverter J, Fita I. 1992. Representation of noncovalent interactions in protein structures. J Mol Graphics 10:96-110.
9. Del Bene J. 1975. Molecular orbital theory of the hydrogen bond. XII. J Chem Phys 62:1961-1970.
10. Dill KA. 1990. Dominant forces in protein folding. Biochemistry 29:7133-7155.
11. Dill KA, Bromberg S, Yue K, Fiebig KM, Thomas PD, Chan HS. 1995. Principles of protein folding - A perspective from simple exact models. Protein Sci 4:561-602.
12. Eisenberg D, Weiss RM, Terwillinger TC. 1984. The hydrophobic moment detects periodicity in protein hydrophobicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81.
13. Flory PJ. 1969. Statistical mechanics of chain molecules. New York: Interscience Publishers.
14. Hinds D, Levitt M. 1994. Exploring conformational space with a simple lattice model for protein structure. J Mol Biol 243:668-682.
15. Hubbard S. 1991. ACCESS. London: UCL.
16. Kolinski A, Skolnick J. 1994. Monte Carlo simulations of protein folding. I. Lattice model and interaction scheme. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 18:338-352.
17. Kuntz ID, Crippen GM, Kollman PA, Kimelman D. 1976. Calculation of protein tertiary structure. J Mol Biol 106:983-994.
18. Lee BK, Richards FM. 1971. The interpretation of protein structures: Estimation of static accessibility. J Mol Biol 55:379-400.
19. Legon AC, Millen DJ. 1987. Directional character, strength, and nature of the hydrogen bond in gas phase dimers. Acc Chem Res 20:39-45.
20. Levitt M, Warshel A. 1975. Computer simulation of protein folding. Nature 253:694-698.
21. McDonald I, Thornton J. 1994. Satisfying hydrogen bonding potential in proteins. J Mol Biol 238:777-793.
22. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL. 1985. Estimation of effective interresidue contact energies from protein crystal structures: Quasi-chemical approximation. Macromolecule 18:534-552.
23. Monge A, Friesner RA, Honig B. 1994. An algorithm to generate low-resolution protein tertiary structures from knowledge of secondary structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:5027-5029.
24. Novotny J, Rashin AA, Bruccoleri RE. 1988. Criteria that discriminate between native proteins and incorrectly folded models. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 4:19-30.
25. Sharp K, Nicholls A, Fine RF, Honig B. 1991. Reconciling the magnitude of the microscopic and macroscopic hydrophobic effects. Science 252: 106.
26. Sippl M, Hendlich M, Lackner P. 1992. Assembly of polypeptide and protein backbone conformations from low energy ensembles of short fragments: Development of strategies and construction of models for myoglobin, lysozyme, and thymosin beta 4. Protein Sci 1:625-640.
27. Skolnick J, Kolinski A. 1990. Simulations of the folding of a globular protein. Science 250:1121-1125.
28. Srinivasan R, Rose G. 1995. LINUS - A hierarchic procedure to predict the fold of a protein. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 22:81-99.
29. Sun S, Thomas PD, Dill KA. 1995. A simple protein folding algorithm using a binary code and secondary structure constraints. Protein Eng. Forthcoming.
30. Taylor R, Kennard O. 1984. Hydrogen bond geometry in organic crystals. Acc Chem Res 17:320-326.
31. Vajda S, Jafri MS, Sezerman OU, DeLisi C. 1993. Necessary conditions for avoiding incorrect polypeptide folds in conformational search by energy minimization. Biopolymers 33:173-192.
32. Wallqvist A, Ullner M. 1994. A simplified amino acid potential for use in structure predictions of proteins. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 18:267-280.
33. Wilson C, Doniach S. 1989. A computer model to dynamically simulate protein folding - Studies with crambin. Proteins Struct Fund Genet 6:193-209.
34. Yue K, Dill KA. 1993. Sequence structure relationship of proteins and copolymers. Phys Rev E 48:2267-2278.
35. Yue K, Dill KA. 1995. Forces of tertiary structural organization of globular proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:146-150.
36. Yue K, Fiebig KM, Thomas PD, Chan HS, Shakhnovich EI, Dill KA. 1995. A test of lattice protein folding algorithms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:325-329.