Students and substances: Social power in drug education

Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 65-82

  Brown, Joel H ^a   D'Emidio Caston, Marianne ^b   Pollard, John A ^c  

^a Educational Research Consultants   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c Developmental Research and Program   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031512645     PISSN: 01623737     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/01623737019001065     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
2. Bangert-Drowns, R. L. (1988). The effects of school-based substance abuse education - A meta-analysis. Journal of Drug Education, 18, 243-265.
3. Baumrind, D., & Moselle, K. A. (1985). A developmental perspective on adolescent drug abuse. Advances in Alcohol and Substance Abuse, 4(3, 4), 41-67.
4. Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis in communication research. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
5. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality. New York: Doubleday.
6. Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interaction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
7. Brown, J. H. (Ed.). (1996). Advances in confluent education: Vol. I. Integrating consciousness for human change. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
8. Brown, J. H., & D'Emidio-Caston, M. (1995). On becoming at risk through drug education: How symbolic policies and their practices affect students. Evaluation Review, 19(4), 451-492.
9. Brown, J. H., & Horowitz, J. E. (1993). Deviance & deviants: Why adolescent substance use prevention programs do not work. Evaluation Review. 17(5), 529-555.
10. Bruvold, W. H. (1990). A meta analysis of the California school-based risk reduction program. Journal of Drug Education, 20(2), 139-152.
11. California State Department of Education. (1991-1992). Healthy kids, healthy California: Drug, alcohol, and tobacco education (DATE) (District application for funding). Sacramento, CA: Healthy Kids, Healthy California Office.
12. California State Department of Education. (1992). California basic educational data system. Sacramento, CA: Author.
13. Chng, C. L. (1981). The goal of abstinence: Implications for drug education. The Journal of Drug Education, 11(1), 13-18.
14. Clayton, R. R., Catarello, A. M., & Johnstone, B. M. (1996). The effectiveness of drug abuse resistance education (Project DARE): 5-year follow up results. Journal of Preventive Medicine, 25(3) 1-12.
15. DeMeulle, L., & D'Emidio-Caston, M. (1996). Confluent education: A coherent vision of teacher education. In J. H. Brown (Ed.), Advances in confluent education: Vol. I. Integrating consciousness for human change (pp. 43-62). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
16. Dukes, R. L., Ullman, J. B., & Stein, J. A. (1996). Three year follow-up of drug abuse resistance education (DARE). Evaluation Review, 20(1), 49-66.
17. Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Miller-Buchanan, C., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C., & MacIver, D. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents' experiences in schools and families. American Psychologist, 48(2), 90-101.
18. Ellickson, P. L. (1995). Schools. In R. H. Coombs & D. Ziedonis (Eds.), Handbook on drug abuse prevention: A comprehensive strategy to prevent the abuse of alcohol and other drugs (pp. 93-120). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
19. Ennett, S. T., Tobler, N. S., Ringwalt, C. L., & Flewelling, R. L. (1994). How effective is Drug Abuse Resistance Education? A meta-analysis of Project DARE outcome evaluations. American Journal of Public Health, 84(9), 1394-1401.
20. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
21. Fischhoff, B. (1975). Hindsight does not equal foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 104, 288-299.
22. Fischhoff, B. (1992). Risk taking: A developmental perspective. In J. F. Yates (Ed.), Risk taking, New York: Wiley.
23. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
24. Gilchrist, V. J. (1992). Key informant interviews. In B. F. Crabtree & W. L. Miller (Eds.), Doing qualitative research (pp. 70-89). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
25. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research, New York: Aldine.
26. Haaga, J. G., & Reuter, P. H. (1995). Prevention: The (lauded) orphan of drug policy. In R. H. Coombs & D. Ziedonis (Eds.), Handbook on drug abuse prevention: A comprehensive strategy to prevent the abuse of alcohol and other drugs (pp. 3-17). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
27. Horowitz, J. E., & Brown, J. H. (1996). Confluent education and evaluation research. In J. H. Brown (Ed.), Advances in confluent education: Vol I. Integrating consciousness for human change. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
28. Hoveland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1963). Communication and persuasion, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
29. Humphrey, R. H., O'Malley, P. M., Johnston, L. D., & Bachman, J. D. (1988). Bases of power, facilitation effects, and attitudes and behavior: Direct, indirect, and interactive determinants of drug use. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51(4), 329-345.
30. Jessor, R. (1993). Successful adolescent development among youth in high risk settings. American Psychologist, 48(2), 117-126.
31. Jessor, R., & Jessor, S. L. (1977). Problem behavior and psychosocial development: A longitudinal study of youth. New York: Academic Press.
32. Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 602-661.
33. Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., & Bachman, J. G. (1995). National survey results on drug use from the monitoring the future study, 1975-1994. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute on Drug Abuse.
34. Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology: Vol. 2 (pp. 219-266). New York: Academic Press.
35. Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Vol. 15, Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
36. Kirk, J., & Miller, M. (1986). Reliability and validity in qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
37. Klitzner, M. D. (1987). Part 2: An assessment of the research on school-based prevention programs (Report to Congress and the White House on the nature and effectiveness of federal, state, and local drug prevention/education programs). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
38. LeCompte, M. D., & Preissle, J. (1993). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
39. Liotts, R. F., Jason, L. A., & DuPont, P. J. (1983). The relevance of developmental theory for preventive drug education programs. Bulletin of the Society of Psychologists of Addictive Behaviors, 2179-2188.
40. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1989). Designing qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
41. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
42. National Commission on Marihuana and Drug Abuse. (1973). Drug use in America: Problem and perspective (pp. 346-367). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
43. Newcomb, M., & Bentler, P. (1988). Consequences of adolescent drug use: Impact on the lives of young adults. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
44. Quandrel, M. J., Fischhoff, B., & Davis, W. (1993). Adolescent (in)vulnerability. American Psychologist, 48(2), 102-116.
45. Raven, B. H. (1965). Social influence and power. In I. D. Steiner & M. Fishbein (Eds.), Current studies in social psychology (pp. 371-382). New York: Holt, Rinehart, Winston.
46. Raven, B. H. (1989). A glossary of terms related to interpersonal influence and social power. Unpublished manuscript, University of California at Los Angeles.
47. Raven, B. H. (1993). The bases of power: Origins and recent developments. Journal of Social Issues, 49(4), 227-251.
48. Romero, F., Bailey, J., Carr, C., Flaherty, J., Fleming, T., Radio-Gaynor, J., Houle, D., Karam, R., Lark, M., & Thomas, C. (1994). Drug use among in-school youth: Annual evaluation report. Prepared by Southwest Regional Laboratory for the California State Department of Education. Los Alamitos, CA: Southwest Regional Laboratory.
49. Schaps, E., DiBartolo, R., Moskowitz, J., Palley, C. S., & Churgin, S. (1981). A review of 127 drug abuse prevention program evaluations. Journal of Drug Issues, 11, 17-43.
50. Schutz, A., Walsh, G., & Lehnert, F. (1967). The phenomenology of the social world. Evanston, IL: University of Chicago Press.
51. Shedler, J., & Block, J. (1990). Adolescent drug use and psychological health: A longitudinal inquiry. American Psychologist, 45, 612-630.
52. Spradley, J. S. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
53. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
54. Tobler, N. S. (1986). Meta-analysis of 143 adolescent drug prevention programs: Quantitative outcome results of program participants compared to a control or comparison group. Journal of Drug Issues, 16, 537-567.
55. Tobler, N. S. (1992). Drug prevention programs can work: Research findings. Journal of Addictive Diseases, 11(3), 1-26.
56. Weiner, B., Heckhausen, H., Meyer, W. U., & Cook, R. E. (1972). Causal ascriptions and achievement motivation: A conceptual analysis of effort and reanalysis of locus of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 239-248.
57. Zelditch, M. (1962). Some methodological problems of field studies. American Journal of Sociology, 67, 566-576.