Three-year follow-up of Drug Abuse Resistance Education (D.A.R.E.)

Evaluation Review

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 49-66

  Dukes, Richard L ^a,c,d   Ullman, Jodie B ^b   Stein, Judith A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c Center for Social Science Research

^d Center for Social Science Research ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADDICTION; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMAN; MALE; PEER GROUP; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SCHOOL HEALTH SERVICE; SELF CONCEPT; STANDARD; UNITED STATES;

CHILD; COLORADO; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MALE; PEER GROUP; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SCHOOL HEALTH SERVICES; SELF CONCEPT; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

EID: 0030072418     PISSN: 0193841X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0193841X9602000103     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Aiken, L. S., J. A. Stein, and P. M. Bentler. 1994. Structural equation analyses of clinical sub-population differences and comparative treatment outcomes: Characterizing the daily lives of drug addicts. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 62:488-99.
2. Becker, H. K., M. W. Agopian, and S. Yeh. 1992. Impact evaluation of Drug Abuse Resistance Education (DARE). Journal of Drug Education 22:283-91.
3. Bentler, P. M. 1990. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin 107:238-46.
4. Bentler, P. M. 1995. EOS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software, Inc.
5. Bentler, P. M., and T. Dijsktra. 1985. Efficient estimation via linearization in structural models. In Multivariate analysis VI, edited by P. R. Krishnaiah, 9-42. Amsterdam: North Holland.
6. Bentler, P. M., and P. Dudgeon. 1996. Covariance structure analysis: Statistical practice, theory, and directions. Annual Review of Psychology 47:563-92.
7. Chou, C.-P., and P. M. Bentler. 1990. Model modification in covariance structure modeling: Comparison among likelihood ratio, Lagrange multiplier, and Wald test. Multivariate Behavioral Research 25:115-36.
8. Clayton, R. R., A. Cattarello, L. E. Day, and K. P. Walden. 1991. Persuasive communications and drug abuse prevention: An evaluation of the DARE program. In Persuasive communication and drug abuse prevention, edited by L. Donohew, H. Sypher, and W. Bukowski, 295-313. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9. Clayton, R. R., A. Cattarello, and K. P. Walden. 1991. Sensation seeking as a potential mediating variable for school-based prevention interventions: A two-year follow-up of DARE. Journal of Health Communications 3:229-39.
10. DeJong, W. 1987. A short-term evaluation of project DARE (Drug Abuse Resistance Education): Preliminary indications of effectiveness. Journal of Drug Education 17:279-94.
11. Dukes, R. L., J. B. Ullman, and J. A. Stein. 1995. An evaluation of D.A.R.E. (Drug Abuse Resistance Education) using a Solomon four group design with latent variables. Evaluation Review 19:409-35.
12. Education Development Center. 1988. Implementing project DARE: Drug Abuse Resistance Education. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance.
13. Ennett, S. T., D. P. Rosenbaum, R. L. Flewelling, G. S. Bieler, C. L. Ringwalt, and S. L. Bailey. 1994. Long-term evaluation of Drug Abuse Resistance Education. Addictive Behaviors 19:113-25.
14. Ennett, S. T., N. S. Tobler, C. L. Ringwalt, and R. L. Flewelling. 1994. How effective is Drug Abuse Resistance Education? A meta-analysis of project DARE outcome evaluations. American Journal of Public Health 84:1394-401.
15. Evaluation and Training Institute. 1990. DARE evaluation report for 1985-1989. Los Angeles: Evaluation and Training Institute.
16. Faine, J. R., and E. Bohlander, Jr. 1989. DARE in Kentucky schools 1988-89: An evaluation of the Drug Abuse Resistance Education program. Bowling Green, KY: Western Kentucky University Social Research Laboratory.
17. Ringwalt, C., S. T. Ennett, and K. D. Holt. 1991. An outcome evaluation of project DARE (Drug Abuse Resistance Education). Health Education Research: Theory and Practice 6:327-37.
18. Rogers, E. M. 1993. Diffusion and re-invention of project DARE. In Organizational aspects of health communication campaigns: What works?, edited by T. E. Backer and E. M. Rogers, 139-62. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19. Rosenbaum, D. P., R. P. Flewelling, S. L. Bailey, C. L. Ringwalt, and D. L. Wilkinson. 1994. Cops in the classroom: A longitudinal evaluation of Drug Abuse Resistance Education (DARE). Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 31:3-31.
20. Rosenberg, M. 1965. Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21. Satorra, A., and P. M. Bentler. 1990. Model conditions for asymptotic robustness in the analysis of linear relations. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 10:235-49.
22. Wysong, E., R. Aniskiewicz, and D. Wright. 1994. Truth and DARE: Tracking drug education to graduation and as symbolic politics. Social Problems 41:448-72