The effectiveness of drug abuse resistance education (project DARE): 5-year follow-up results

Preventive Medicine

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 307-318

  Clayton, Richard R ^a   Cattarello, Anne M ^b   Johnstone, Bryan M ^c  

^a Department of Internal Medicine   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN EAU CLAIRE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

DARE; Drug prevention; Drug resistance skills; School based

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL ABUSE; ALCOHOLISM; ARTICLE; CURRICULUM; DRUG ABUSE; DRUG DEPENDENCE; EDUCATION PROGRAM; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHOOL;

CHILD; CURRICULUM; EFFECT MODIFIERS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); FEMALE; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; KENTUCKY; MALE; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PEER GROUP; PROGRAM EVALUATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SCHOOL HEALTH SERVICES; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

EID: 0029937412     PISSN: 00917435     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/pmed.1996.0061     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ennett ST, Rosenbaum DP, Flewelling RL, Bieler GS, Ringwalt CR, Bailey SL. Long-term evaluation of drug abuse resistance education. Addict Behav 1994; 19:113-25.
2. Harmon MA. Reducing the risk of drug involvement among early adolescents: an evaluation of drug abuse resistance education (DARE). Eval Rev 1993; 17:221-39.
3. Ringwalt CR, Ennett ST, Holt KD. An outcome evaluation of Project D.A.R.E. (drug abuse resistance education). Health Educ Res 1991; 6:327-37.
4. Hansen WB, Johnson CA, Flay BR, Graham JW, Sobel J. Affective and social influences approaches to the prevention of multiple substance use among seventh grade students: results from project SMART. Prev Med 1988; 17:135-54.
5. Pentz MA, MacKinnon DP, Flay BR, Hansen WB, Johnson CA, Dwyer JH. Primary prevention of chronic diseases in adolescence: effects of the midwestern prevention project on tobacco use. Am J Epidemiol 1989; 130:713-24.
6. Pentz MA, Dwyer JH, MacKinnon DP, et al. A multicommunity trial for primary prevention of adolescent drug abuse. JAMA 1989; 261:3259-366.
7. Clayton RR, Cattarello A, Day LE, Walden KP. Persuasive communications and drug prevention: an evaluation of the D.A.R.E. program. In: Donohew L, Sypher HE, Bukoski WJ, editors. Persuasive communication and drug abuse prevention. Hillsdale (NJ): Erlbaum, 1991:295-313.
8. DeJong W. A short-term evaluation of project DARE (drug abuse resistance education): preliminary indications of effectiveness. J Drug Educ 1987; 17:279-94.
9. Faine JR, Bohlander E. Drug abuse resistance education: an assessment of the 1987-88 Kentucky State Police DARE Program. Bowling Green (KY): Western Kentucky Univ. Soc. Res. Lab. 1988.
10. Aniskiewicz R, Wysong E. Evaluating DARE: drug education and the multiple meanings of success. Policy Stud Rev 1990; 9:727-47.
11. Becker HK, Agopian MW, Yeh S. Impact evaluation of drug abuse resistance education (DARE). J Drug Educ 1992; 22:283-91.
12. Faine JR, Bohlander E. D.A.R.E. in Kentucky Schools 1988-89. Bowling Green (KY): Western Kentucky Univ. Soc. Res. Lab. 1989.
13. Wysong E, Aniskiewicz R, Wright D. Truth and D.A.R.E.: tracking drug education to graduation and as symbolic politics. Soc. Probl. 1994; 41:448-72.
14. Ennett ST, Tobler NS, Ringwalt CL, Flewelling RL. How effective is drug abuse resistance education? A meta-analysis of Project DARE outcome evaluations. Am J Public Health 1994; 84:1394-1401.
15. Hansen WB. School-based substance abuse prevention: a review of the state of the art in curriculum, 1980-1990. Health Educ Res 1992; 7:403-30.
16. Dwyer JH, Feinleib M, Lippert P, Hoffmeister H. Statistical models for longitudinal studies of health. New York: Oxford, 1992.
17. Hansen WB, Collins LM, Malotte CK, Johnson CA, Fielding JE. Attrition in prevention research. J Behav Med 1985; 8:261-75.
18. Biglan A, Severson H, Ary D, et al. Do smoking prevention programs really work? Attrition and the internal and external validity of an evaluation of a refusal skills program. J Behav Med 1987; 10:159-71.
19. Biglan A, Hood D, Brozovsky P, Ochs L, Ary D, Black C. Subject attrition in prevention research. In: Leukefeld CG, Bukoski WJ, editors. Drug abuse prevention intervention research: methodological issues. Natl Inst Drug Abuse Res Monogr Ser. 1991; 107:213-34.
20. Goldstein H. Multilevel models in educational and social Research. London: Oxford, 1987.
21. Bryk AS, Raudenbush SW. Hierarchical linear models: applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park: Sage, 1992.
22. Rogosa DR, Brandt D, Zimowski M. A growth curve approach to the measurement of change. Psychol Bull 1983; 90:726-48.
23. Rogosa DR, Willett JB. Understanding correlates of change by modeling individual differences in growth. Psychometrika 1985; 50:203-28.
24. Johnstone BM. Sociodemographic, environmental, and cultural influences on adolescent drinking behavior. In: Zucker R, Boyd G, Howard J, editors. The development of alcohol problems: exploring the biopsychosocial matrix of risk. Rockville (MD): Nat Inst Alcohol Abuse Alcohol Res Monogr 26, 1994:169-204.
25. Cook TD, Campbell DT. Quasi-experimentation: design and analysis issues for fields settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1979.
26. Laird NM, Ware JH. Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics 1982; 38:963-74.
27. Bryk AS, Raudenbush SW. Application of hierarchical models to assessing change. Psychol Bull 1987;101:147-58.
28. Botvin GJ, Baker E, Dusenbury L, Botvin EM, Diaz T. Long-term follow-up results of a randomized drug abuse prevention trial in a white middle-class population. J Am Med Assoc 1995; 273:1106-12.