Clinical and scientific applications/advances in video imaging

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 66, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 407-416

  Grubb, John E ^a   Smith, Tim ^a   Sinclair, Peter ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Communication, interspecialty; Esthetics; Informed consent; Morphing; Video imaging

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DATA BASE; DENTAL CARE; FORECASTING; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALOCCLUSION; MEDICAL RECORD; ORTHODONTICS; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PUBLIC RELATIONS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VIDEORECORDING;

COMMUNICATION; DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; DENTAL RECORDS; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; FORECASTING; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; MALOCCLUSION; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 0030331995     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. Broadbent BH. A new x-ray technique and its application to orthodontia. Angle Orthod 1931;1:45-66.
2. Brodie AG. On the growth pattern of the human head, from the third month to the eighth year of life. Am J Anat 1941;68: 209.
3. Tweed CH. Pre-orthodontic guidance procedure. Classification of facial growth trends: Treatment timing. Vistas in Orthodontics. Philadelphia:Lea Febiger, 1962.
4. Graber TM. Clinical Cephalometric Analysis, Vistas in Orthodontics. Philadelphia:Lea Febiger, 1962; 162.
5. Nanda RS. The rates of growth of several facial components measured from serial cephalometric roentgengrams. Am J Orthod 1955;41: 658-673.
6. Bjork A, Skieller V. Facial development and tooth eruption. Am J Orthod 1972; 62: 339-382.
7. Kerr WJS, Hirst D. Craniofacial characteristics of subjects with normal and postnormal occlusions-a longitudinal study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1987; 92: 207-12.
8. Suzuki A, Takahama Y. Parental data used to predict growth of craniofacial form. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1991;99: 107-121.
9. Nakata M. Genetic study on infantile cranio-facial pattern by twin method. J Stomatol Soc Jpn 1967; 34: 376-88.
10. Arya BS, et al. Genetic variability of craniofacial dimensions. Angle Orthod 1973; 43: 207-15.
11. Nakasima A, Ichinose M. Role of parental variables in predicting facial growth after treatment of anterior crossbite. Am J Orthod 1986; 90: 492-500.
12. Houston WJB, Brown WAB. Family likeness as a basis for facial growth prediction. Eur J Orthod 1980; 2: 13-18.
13. Schendel SA, Eisenfels J, Bell WH, Epker B. The long face syndrome: vertical maxillary excess. Am J Orthod 1976; 70: 398-408.
14. Swinehart EW. A clinical study of open-bite. Am J Orthod 1942; 28: 18-34.
15. Baumrind S, Korn El, West E. Prediction of mandibular rotation: an empirical test of clinician performance. Am J Orthod 1984; 86: 371.
16. Skieller V, Bjork A, Linde-Hanson T. Prediction of mandibular growth rotation evaluated from a longitudinal implant sample. Am J Orthod 1984; 86: 359-370.
17. Björk A, Skieller V. Normal and abnormal growth of the mandible: A synthesis of longitudinal cephalometric implant studies over a period of 25 years. Eur J Orthod 1983; 5: 1-46.
18. Björk A. Variations in the growth pattern of the human mandible. Longitudinal radiographic study by the implant method. J Dent Res 1963; 42: 400-11.
19. Björk A. Prediction of mandibular growth rotation. Am J Orthod 1969; 55: 585-99
20. Björk A. The role of genetic and local environment factors in normal and abnormal morphogenesis. Acta Morph Neerl Scand 1972; 10: 49-58
21. Björk A Skieller V. Facial development and tooth eruption: An implant study at the age of puberty. Am J Orthod 1972; 62: 339-83.
22. Singer CP, Mamandras AH, Hunter WS. The depth of the mandibular notch as an indicator of mandibular growth potential. Am J Orthod 1987; 91; 117-24.
23. Aki T, Nanda RS, Currier GF, Nanda SK. Assessment of symphysis morphology as a predictor of the direction of mandibular growth. Am J Orthod 1994; 106: 60-69.
24. Solow B, Siersbaek-Nielsen S. Cervical and craniocervical posture as predictors of craniofacial growth. Am J Orthod 1992; 101: 449-58.
25. Baumrind S, Korn E, West EE. Prediction of mandibular rotation: An empirical test of clinician performance. Am J Orthod 1984; 86: 371-85.
26. Hixon EH. Prediction of facial growth. Trans Eur Orthod Soc 1968; 44: 127-139.
27. Ricketts RM. A principle of arcial growth of the mandible. Angle Orthod 1972; 42: 368-386.
28. Johnson LE. A simplified approach to prediction. Am J Orthod 1975; 67: 253-257.
29. Popovich F, Thompson GW. Craniofacial templates for orthodontic case analysis. Am J Orthod 1977; 71: 406-420.
30. Greenberg LZ, Johnson LE. Computerized prediction: The accuracy of contemporary long-range forecast. Am J Orthod 1975; 67: 243-352.
31. Schulhof RJ, Bagha L. A statistical evaluation of the Ricketts and Johnson growth forecasting methods. Am J Orthod 1975; 67: 258-276.
32. Thames TL, Sinclair PM, Alexander RG. The accuracy of computerized prediction in high-angle cases. Am J Orthod 1985; 87: 398-405.
33. Rocky Mountain Orthodontics. Facial Print, a growth to maturity forecast. RMO New Products, 1992.
34. DiCiccio P. Assessment of the accuracy of three methods of computerized growth prediction of the soft tissue profile, in untreated individuals [thesis]. Loma Linda: Loma Linda Univ, 1993.
35. Goldstein RE, Garber DA, High technology esthetic dentistry: Who needs it? J Esthet Dent 1994; 6(1):1.
36. Sarver DM. Video imaging: The pros and cons. Angle Orthod 1993; 63; 167-170.
37. Ackerman JL, Profitt WR. Communication in orthodontic treatment planning: Bioethical and informed consent issues. Angle Orthod 1995; 65(4): 253-262.
38. Turpin D. The need for video imaging. Editorial. Angle Orthod 1995; 65(4):243.
39. Phillips C, Hill B, Cannac C. The influence of video imaging on patients' perceptions and expectations. Angle Orthod 1995; 65(4): 263-270.
40. Park Young-Chen, Burstone CJ. Soft-tissue profiles- Fallicies of hard tissue standards in treatment planning. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1986; 90: 52-62.
41. Richardson A. A comparison of traditional and computerized methods of cephalometric analysis. Eur J Orthod 1981; 3: 15-20.
42. Houston WJB. A comparison of the reliability of measurement of cephalometric radiographs by tracings and direct digitization. Swed Dent J 1982; 15 (suppl): 99-103.
43. Davis DN, Mackay F. Reliability of cephalometric analysis using manual and interactive computer methods. Brit J Orthod 1991; 18(2):105-109.
44. Friede H, et al. Accuracy of cephalometric prediction in orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1987; 45:754-760.
45. Nimkarn Y, Miles P. Reliability of computer-generated cephalometrics. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 1995; 10(1):43-52.
46. Hing NR. The accuracy of computer generated prediction tracings. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surgery 1989; 18: 148-151
47. Konstantiantos KA, O'Reilly MT, Close J. The validity of the prediction of soft tissue profile changes after LeFort I osteotomy using dentofacial planner (computer software). Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1994; 105(3): 241-249.
48. Eales EA, Newton C, Jones ML, Sugar A. The accuracy of computerized prediction of the soft tissue profile: A study of 25 patients treated by means of the Lefort I osteotomy. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 1994; 9(2) : 141-152.
49. Upton, PM. Evaluation of video imaging prediction in combined maxillary and mandibular orthognathic surgery (abstract). Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1994; 106(4): 451.
50. Sinclair PM, Kilpelainen P, Phillips C, White RP, Rogers L, Sarver DM. The accuracy of video imaging in orthodognathic surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1995;107 (2): 177-185.
51. Syliangco SM, Sinclair PM, Sameshima, GT, Kaminishi RM. The accuracy of video imaging in the prediction of mandibular advancement surgery [thesis]. Los Angeles: Univ. of Southern California, 1995.
52. Kawakami R. The accuracy of video imaging in predicting soft tissue changes associated with maxillary impaction surgery [thesis]. Los Angeles: Univ. of Southern California, 1995.