Diffusion of adsorbed Si dimers on Si(001)

Surface Science

Volumn 385, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 146-154

  Krueger, Michael ^a   Borovsky, Brian ^a   Ganz, Eric ^a  

^a University of Minnesota ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Epitaxy growth; Models of surface kinetics; Molecular dynamics; Scanning tunneling microscopy; Silicon; Stepped single crystal surfaces; Surface diffusion

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATION ENERGY; ADSORPTION; CRYSTAL ORIENTATION; DIFFUSION IN SOLIDS; EPITAXIAL GROWTH; FREE ENERGY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; SCANNING TUNNELING MICROSCOPY; SINGLE CRYSTALS; SUBSTRATES; SURFACE STRUCTURE;

DIMERS; STEPPED SINGLE CRYSTALS;

SILICON;

EID: 0031209223     PISSN: 00396028     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0039-6028(97)00222-7     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. A. van Dam, J. van Wingerden, M.J. Haye, P.M.L.O. Scholte, F. Tuinstra, Phys. Rev. B 54 (1996) 1557.
2. J. van Wingerden, A. van Dam, M.J. Haye, P.M.L.O. Scholte, F. Tuinstra, Phys. Rev. B, in press.
3. D.W. Pohl, R. Möller, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 59 (1988) 840.
4. B.S. Swartzentruber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76 (1996) 459.
5. G. Brocks, P.J. Kelly, R. Car, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66 (1991) 1729.
6. Y.-W. Mo, J. Kleiner, M.B. Webb, M.G. Lagally, Surf. Sci. 268 (1992) 275.
7. D. Dijkkamp, E.J. van Loenen, H.B. Elswijk, in: A. Yoshimori, T. Shinjo, H. Watanabe (Eds.), Ordering at Surfaces and Interfaces, Springer Series in Materials Science, Vol. 17, Springer, Berlin, 1992, p. 85.
8. G. Brocks, P.J. Kelly, R. Car, Surf. Sci. 269/270 (1992) 860.
9. T. Yamasaki, T. Uda, K. Terakura, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76 (1996) 2949.
10. C. Pearson, M. Krueger, R. Curtis, B. Borovsky, X. Shi, E. Ganz, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 13 (1995) 1506.
11. The calculations of Yamasaki et al. indicate that the activation energy for dimer formation is approximately equal to the activation energy for monomer diffusion; when two diffusing monomers meet, there is no additional energy barrier to dimer formation [9]. Once formed, the dimers are quite stable, as demonstrated in Section 3.
12. Because a measurement of the free-terrace hop rate is desired, only sites that are not adjacent to surface features are included in the analysis.
13. The asymmetric uncertainty in the room-temperature rate is caused by the application of Poisson statistics to the small number of events observed.
14. Y.-W. Mo, Science 261 (1993) 886.
15. B.S. Swartzentruber, A.P. Smith, H. Jónsson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 2518.
16. A test confirmed that at high temperature, the hop rate is insensitive to tip field variations. For a sample biased (1 V with respect to the tip, variation of the tunneling current from 0.03 to 0.2 nA produced only negligible changes in the hop rate at ∼460 K. All STM images and tracking data were acquired at bias magnitudes ranging from 0.5 to 2.5 V and a tunneling current of ∼0.05 nA.
17. B.C. Reed, Am. J. Phys. 60 (1992) 59. The fitting algorithm (York's method) ensures that the parameters and their uncertainties correctly reflect the uncertainties in the rates and in the temperatures.
18. K. Terakura (private communication). Preliminary results for one of the atomic exchange pathways yield 1.28 eV for the activation energy for diffusion; another pathway, the validity of which is currently being checked, may have an even lower energy.
19. The thermocouple on the sample also allowed us to verify that the probe does not alter the sample temperature by more than 1 K during a normal probe measurement. Even when the probe and sample temperatures differed by 115 K, an unrealistically large mismatch, the sample temperature did not change more than 3 K.
20. G. Ehrlich, F.G. Hudda, J. Chem. Phys 44 (1966) 1039.
21. R.L. Schwoebel, E.J. Shipsey, J. Appl. Phys. 37 (1966) 3682.
22. Q.-M. Zhang, C. Roland, P. Boguslawski, J. Bernholc, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 (1995) 101.
23. We recently obtained a preprint of a more extensive experiment by Swartzentruber, in which the dimer free-energy surface in the vicinity of a variety of surface features is mapped out. He measures a free-energy decrease of 50 ± 15 meV at a site bordering a type-A step.