Evaluating physical incapacity: The Barthel Index;Valoracion de la discapacidad fisica: El Indice de Barthel

Revista Espanola de Salud Publica

Volumn 71, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 127-137

  Cid Ruzafa, Javier ^a   Damián Moreno, Javier ^b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INSTITUTO DE SALUD CARLOS III   (Spain)

Author keywords

Barthel index; cerebrovascular accidents; daily activities; disabilities; measurement scales; mortality; old age; physical rehabilitation; Public Health

Indexed keywords

AGING; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; HUMAN; MEASUREMENT; MORTALITY; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; PUBLIC HEALTH; REVIEW; AGED; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DISABILITY; HOSPITALIZATION; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; CEREBROVASCULAR DISORDERS; DISABILITY EVALUATION; HUMANS; PUBLIC HEALTH; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 0031082862     PISSN: 11355727     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s1135-57271997000200004     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. Wade DT. Pathology, impairment, disability, handicap, a useful model. In: Measurement in Neurological Rehabilitation Nueva York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
2. Feinstein AR, Josephy BR, Wells CK. Scientific and clinical problems in indexes of functional disability. Ann Intern Med 1986; 105: 413-420.
3. Guralnik JM, Fried LP, Salive ME Disability as a public health outcome in the aging population. Annu Rev Public Health 1996; 17: 25-46.
4. Benítez Rosario MA, Vázquez Díaz JR. Valoración del grado de autonomía de los ancianos Aten Primaria 1992; 10: 888-891.
5. Applegate WB, Blass JP, Williams TF. Instruments for the functional assessment of older patients. N Eng J Med 1990; 322: 1207-1214.
6. Ware JE. The status of health assessment 1994. Annu Rev Public Health 1995; 16: 327-354.
7. Testa MA, Simonson DC. Assessment of quality of life outcomes. N Eng J Med 1996; 334: 835-840.
8. Wylie CM Measuring end results of rehabilitation of patients with stroke. Public Health Rep 1967; 82: 893-898.
9. Gresham GE, Philips TF, Labi MLC. ADL status in stroke: relative merits of three standard indexes. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1980; 61: 355-358.
10. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md Med J 1965; 14: 61-65.
11. Mahoney FI, Wood OH, Barthel DW. Rehabilitation of chronically ill patients: the influence of complications on the final goal. South Med J 1958; 51: 605-609.
12. Wylie CM, White BK. A measure of disability. Arch Environ Health 1964; 8: 834-839.
13. Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol 1989; 42: 703-709
14. Collin C, Wade DT, Davies S, Home V. The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. Int Disabil Studies 1988; 10: 61-63.
15. Wade DT, Collin C. The Barthel ADL Index, a standard measure of physical disability? Int Disabil Studies 1988; 10: 64-67.
16. Medical Outcomes Trust Instrument review criteria. Medical Outcomes Trust Bull 1995; (September): 1-4.
17. Granger CV, Dewis LS, Peters NC, Sherwood CC, Barrett JE Stroke rehabilitation, analysis of repeated Barthel Index measures Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1979; 60: 14-17.
18. Granger CV, Albrecht GL, Hamilton BB. Outcome of comprehensive medical rehabilitation: measurement by PULSES Profile and the Barthel Index. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1979; 60: 145-154.
19. Jacelon CS. The Barthel Index and other indices of functional ability. Rehabil Nursing 1986; 11: 9-11.
20. Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Gresham GE, Kramer AA. The Stroke Rehabilitation Outcome Study: part II. Relative merits of the total Barthel Index score and a form-item subscore in predicting patients outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1989; 70: 100-103.
21. Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Gresham GE. The Stroke Rehabilitation Outcome Study: part I General description. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988; 69: 506-509.
22. McGinnis GE, Seward ML, DeJong G, Scott Osberg MA. Program evaluation of physical medicine and rehabilitation departments using self-report Barthel. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986; 67: 123-125.
23. Loewen SC, Anderson BA. Reliability of the Modified Motor Assessment scale and the Barthel Index. Phys Ther 1988; 68: 1077-1081.
24. Collin C, Davis S, Horne V, Wade DT. Reliability of the Barthel ADL Index. Int J Rehab Res 1987; 10: 356-357.
25. Roy CW, Togneri J, Hay E, Pentland B. An inter-rater reliability study of the Barthel Index. Int J Rehabil Res 1988; 11:67-70.
26. Wellwood I, Dennis MS, Warlow CP. A comparision of the Barthel Index and the OPCS disability instrument used to measure outcome after acute stroke Ageing 1995; 24: 54-57.
27. Wade DT, Hewer RL. Functional abilities after stroke: measurement, natural history and prognosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1987; 50: 177-182.
28. van Bennekom CAM, Jelles P, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM. Responsiveness of the Rehabilitation Activities Profile and the Barthel Index J Clin Epidemiol 1996; 49: 39-44.
29. Stone SP, Ali B, Auberleek I, Thompsell A. Young A. The Barthel Index in clinical practice: use on a rehabilitation ward for elderly people. J Roy Coll Phys Lond 1994; 28: 419-423.
30. Korner-Bitensky N, Wood-Dauphinee S. Barthel Index information elicited over the telephone. Is it reliable? Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 74: 9-18.
31. Dorevitch MI, Cossar RM, Bailey FJ, Bisset T, Lewis SJ, Wise LA et al. The accuracy of self and informant ratings of physical functional capacity in the elderly. J Clin Epidemiol 1992; 45: 791-798.
32. Magaziner J, Bassett SS, Hebel JR, Gruber-Baldini A. Use of proxies to measure health and functional status in epidemiologic studies of community dwelling women aged 65 years and older. Am J Epidemiol 1996; 143: 283-292.
33. Korner-Bitensky N, Wood-Dauphinee S, Siemiatycki J, Shapiro S, Becker R. Health related information postdischarge: telephone versus face-to-face interviewing. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1994; 75: 1287-1296.
34. Baztán JJ, Pérez del Molino J, Alarcón T, San Cristóbal E, Izquierdo G, Manzarbeitia I Indice de Barthel: Instrumento valido para la valoración funcional de pacientes con enfermedad cerebrovascular. Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol 1993; 28: 32-40.
35. Jitapunkul S, Kamolratanakul P, Ebrahim S. The meaning of activities of daily living in a thai elderly population: development of a new index. Age Ageing 1994; 23: 97-101.
36. Yarkony GM, Roth EJ, Heinemann AW, Lovell LL. Spinal cord injury rehabilitation outcome: the impact of age. J Clin Epidemiol 1988; 41: 173-177.
37. Pedersen PM, Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Orientation in the acute and chronic stroke patient, impact on ADL and social activities. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77: 336-339.
38. Fortinsky RH, Granger CV, Seltzer GB. The use of functional assessment in understanding home care needs. Med Care 1981; 19: 489-497.
39. Alarcón Alarcón MT, González Montalvo JI, Bárcena Alvarez A, Sánchez-del Corral Usaola F, Muñoz Cebrián C, Salgado Alba A. Características del «paciente geriátrico» al ingreso en la unidad de agudos de un servicio de geriatría. Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol 1993; 28: 285-290.
40. Trust Study Group. Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of nimodipine in acute stroke. Lancet 1990; 336: 1205-1209.
41. Rockwood K, Stolee P, Fox RA. Use of goal attainment scaling in measuring clinically important change in the frail elderly. J Clin Epidemiol 1993; 46: 1113-1118.
42. Guyatt GH, Eagle DJ, Sackett B, Willan A, Griffith L, McIlroy W et al Measuring quality of life in the frail elderly. J Clin Epidemiol 1993; 46: 1433-1444.
43. Pound P, Gompertz P, Ebrahim S. Development and results of a questionnaire to measure carer satisfaction after stroke. J Epidemiol Community Health 1993; 47: 500-505.
44. Nikolaus T, Bach M, Specht-Leible N, Oster P, Schlierf G. The Timed Test of Money Counting: a short physical performance test for manual dexterity and cognitive capacity. Age Ageing 1995; 24: 257-258.
45. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S The timed «Up & Go»: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991; 39: 142-148.
46. Roden Jullig A, Britton M, Gustafsson C, Fugl-Meyer A. Validation of four scales for the acute stage of stroke. J Intern Med 1994; 236: 125-36.
47. Roda Alcayde C, Climent Barbera JM, Serralta Davia I, Tortosa Grau N, Díaz Llopis I, Reig Ferrer A. Comparación entre la utilidad de una escalade valoración funcional y un perfil de salud en una muestra de pacientes hemipléjicos Rehabilitación (Madr) 1993; 27: 340-342.
48. Rothman ML, Hedrick S, Inui T The Sickness Impact Profile as a measure of the health status of noncognitively impaired nursing home residents. Med Care 1989; 27: S157-S167
49. Gloth FM, Waltson J, Meyer J, Pearson J Reliability and validity of the Frail Elderly Functional Asessment Questionnaire. Am J Phys Med Rehab 1995; 74: 45-53.
50. Perlado F, Alastuey C, Espinosa C, Clerencia M, Ochoa P, Domingo D. Valoración del estado funcional en ancianos hospitalizados: la escala de Plutchik. Med Clin (Barc) 1996; 107: 45-49.
51. Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM. Physical disability in older americans J Gerontol 1993; 48 (special issue): 3-10.