The use of the same image analysis system to detect genetic damage in human lymphocytes treated with doxorubicin in the Comet and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) assays

Mutation Research - Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis

Volumn 390, Issue 1-2, 1997, Pages 69-77

  Anderson, D ^a   Yu, T W ^a   Browne, M A ^b  

^a BIBRA INTERNATIONAL   (United Kingdom)

^b Kinetic Imaging Limited   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Chromosome aberration; Comet; Doxorubicin; FISH; KOMET; KROMASCAN

Indexed keywords

DOXORUBICIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; GENOTOXICITY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LYMPHOCYTE; MUTAGEN TESTING; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0030943056     PISSN: 13835718     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0165-1218(96)00167-X     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. McKelvey-Martin, V.J., M.H.L. Green, P. Schmezer, B.L. Pool-Zobel, M.P. DeMéo and A. Collins (1993) The single cell gel electrophoresis assay (Comet assay): A European review, Mutation Res., 288, 47-63.
2. Fairbairn, D.W., P.L. Olive and K.L. O'Neill (1995) The Comet assay: a comprehensive review, Mutation Res., 339, 37-59.
3. Tucker, J.D., D.A. Lee, M.J. Ramsey, J. Briner, L. Olsen and D.H. Moore II (1994) On the frequency of chromosome exchanges in a control population measured by chromosome painting, Mutation Res., 313, 193-202.
4. Ellard, S., E.M. Parry and J.M. Parry (1995) Use of multicolour chromosome painting to identify chromosomal rearrangements in human lymphocytes exposed to bleomycin. A comparison with conventional cytogenetic analysis of GIEMSA-stained chromosomes, Environ. Mol. Mutagen., 26, 44-54.
5. VanDiemen, P.C.H., D. Maasdam, S. Vermeulen, F. Darrovdi and A.T. Natarajan (1995) Influence of smoking habits on the frequencies of structural and numerical chromosomal aberrations in human peripheral blood lymphocytes using the fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) technique, Mutagenesis, 10, 487-495.
6. Akman, S.A., J.H. Doroshow, T.G. Burke and M. Dizdaroglu (1992). DNA base modifications induced in isolated human chromatin by NADH dehydrogenase-catalysed reduction of doxorubicin. Biochemistry, 31, 3500-3506.
7. Wassermann, K. (1996) Intragenomic heterogeneity of DNA damage formation and repair: a review of cellular responses to covalent drug DNA formation, Crit. Rev. Toxicol., 24(4), 281-322.
8. Migliore, L., R. Barale, D. Belluomini, A.G. Cognetti and L. Loprieno (1987). Cytogenetic damage induced in human lymphocytes by adriamycin and vincristine: A comparison between micronucleus and chromosomal aberration assays. Toxicol. In Vitro, 1(4), 247-254.
9. 2 phase. Mutation Res., 93, 185-193.
10. Nevstad, N.P. (1978). Sister chromatid exchanges and chromosomal aberrations induced in human lymphocytes by the cytostatic drug adriamycin in vivo and in vitro. Mutation Res., 57, 253-258.
11. Singh, N.P., M.T. McCoy, R.R. Tice and E.L. Schneider (1988) A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. Exp. Cell Res., 175, 184-191.
12. Anderson, D., T-W. Yu, B.J. Phillips and P. Schmezer (1994) The effect of various antioxidants and other modifying agents on oxygen radical generated DNA damage in human lymphocytes in the Comet assay. Mutation Res., 307, 261-271.
13. Pool-Zobel, B.L., R.G. Klein, U.M. Leigibel, F. Kuchenmeister, S. Weber and P. Schmezer (1992) Systemic genotoxic effects of tobacco related nitroamines following oral and inhalation administration to Sprague-Dawley rats, Clin. Invest., 70, 299-306.
14. Pool-Zobel, B.L., C. Guigas, R.G. Klein, C.H. Neudecker, H.W. Renner and P. Schmezer (1993) Assessment of genotoxic effects by lindane. Fd. Chem. Toxicol., 31(4), 271-283.
15. Scott, D., N. Danford, B. Dean and D. Kirkland (1983) In vitro chromosome aberration assays. UKEMS The United Kingdom Environmental Mutagen Society, pp. 41-64.
16. Tucker, J.D., W.F. Morgan, A.A. Awa, M. Bauchinger, D. Blakey, M.N. Cornforth, L.G. Littlefield, A.T. Natarajan and C. Shassere (1995) A proposed system for scoring aberrations detected by chromosome painting, Cytogenet. Cell Genet., 682, 211-221.
17. LoveIl, D.P., D. Anderson, R. Albanese, G.E. Amphlett, G. Clare, R. Ferguson, M. Richold, D.G. Papworth and J.R.K. Savage (1989) Statistical analyses of in vivo cytogenetic assays, in: Kirkland, D.J. (Ed.), Statistical Evaluation of Mutagenicity Test Data, Cambridge University Press, pp. 184-232.
18. LeBeau, M. (1996) One FISH, Two FISH, red FISH, blue FISH, Nature Genet., 12, 341-344.
19. Speicher, M.R., Mallard, S.G. and Ward, O.C. (1996) Karotyping human chromosomes by combinational multi-fluor FISH, Nature Genet., 12(4), 368-375.
20. Marx, J. (1996) New methods for expanding the chromosomal paint kit. Science, 273, 430.
21. Klaude, M., S. Eriksoon and Nygren J. Ahnström (1996) The Comet assay: mechanisms and technical considerations, Mutation Res., 363, 89-96.
22. Monteith, D.K. and J. Vanstone, J. (1995) Comparison of the microgel electrophoresis assay and other assays for genotoxicity in the detection of DNA damage Mutation Res., 345, 97-103.
23. Dordal, M.S., M. Jacksonstone, A.C. Ho, J.N. Winter and Atkinson, A.J. (1994) Decreased intracellular compartmentalisation of doxorubicin in cell lines expressing P-glycoprotein. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 217(3), 1286-1290.
24. Doherty, A.T., G. Stemp, A. Wootton, J. Downes and J.M. Parry (1996) The comparison of the use of giemsa-stained and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) in the in vitro chromosome aberration test UKEMS Abstract Booklet 15-17 July, University of Birmingham.
25. Schmid, E., H. Braselmann and U. Nahrstedt (1995) Comparison of γ-ray induced dicentric yields in human lymphocytes measured by conventional analysis and FISH. Mutation Res., 348, 125-130.
26. Anderson, D. and C.R. Richardson (1981) Issues relevant to the assessment of chemically induced chromosome damage in vivo and their relationship to chemical mutagenesis. Mutation Res., 90, 261-272.