Helical CT for detection and characterization of renal masses

Seminars in Ultrasound CT and MRI

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 82-90

  Yuh, Brian I ^a   Cohan, Richard H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY TUMOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TUMOR DIAGNOSIS;

EID: 0030902391     PISSN: 08872171     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0887-2171(97)90052-4     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Warshauer DM, McCarthy SM, Street L, et al: Detection of renal masses: Sensitivities and specificities of excretory/ linear tomography, US, and CT. Radiology 169:363-365, 1988
2. Jamis-Dow CA, Choyke PL, Jennings SB, et al: Small (<3 cm) renal masses: Detection with CT versus US and pathologic correlation. Radiology 198:785-788, 1996
3. Bosniak MA: The current approach to renal cysts. Radiology 158:1-10, 1986
4. Cohan RH, Sherman LS, Korobkin M, et al: Renal masses: Assessment of corticomedullary-phase and nephrographicphase CT scans. Radiology 196:445-451, 1995
5. Heiken JP, Brink JA, Vannier MW: Spiral (helical) CT. Radiology 189:647-656, 1993
6. Herts BR, Einstein DM, Paushter DM: Spiral CT of the abdomen: Artifacts and potential pitfalls. AJR Am J Roentgenol 161:1185-1190, 1993
7. Zeman RK, Fox SH, Silverman PM, et al: Helical (spiral) CT of the abdomen. AJR Am J Roentgenol 160:719-725, 1993
8. Silverman SG, Lee BY, Seltzer SE, et al: Small (<3 cm) renal masses: Correlation of spiral CT features and pathologic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 163:597-605, 1994
9. Birnbaum BA, Jacobs JE: Multiphasic renal CT: Comparison of renal mass enhancement during the corticomedullary and nephrographic phases. Radiology 200:753-758, 1996
10. Ellis JH, Cohan RH, Sonnad SS, et al: Selective use of radiographic low-osmolality contrast media in the 1990s. Radiology 200:297-311, 1996
11. Baumgartner BR, Smith RH, Newfield DM, et al: Comparison of spiral and non-spiral contrast enhanced CT of the kidneys for the detection of focal abnormalities. Presented at the 13th annual meeting of the Society of Uroradiology, Laguna Niguel, CA, January 9, 1994
12. Smith RH, Baumgartner BR, Nelson RC, et al: Comparison of arterial phase and excretory phase contrast-enhanced spiral CT of the kidneys for the detection of focal abnormalities. Presented at the 14th annual meeting of the Society of Uroradiology, Palm Beach, FL, January 14, 1995
13. Brink JA, Heiken JP, Balfe DM, et al: Spiral CT: Decreased spatial resolution in vivo due to broadening of section-sensitivity profile. Radiology 185:469-474, 1992
14. Kalendar WA, Polacin A, Suss C: A comparison of conventional and spiral CT: An experimental study on the detection of spherical lesions. J Comput Assist Tomogr 18:167-176, 1994
15. Kauczor HU, Schwickert HC, Schweden F, et al: Bolusenhanced renal spiral CT: Technique, diagnostic value and drawbacks. Eur J Radiol 18:153-157, 1994
16. Kopka L, Zoeler G, Schmidt C, et al: Helical CT of the kidneys in the corticomedullary and nephrographic contrast phases: Detection of renal masses and staging of renal cell carcinoma. Radiology 197(P): 147, 1995 (abstr)
17. Bosniak MA: Problematic renal masses. RSNA syllabus: A categorical course in genitourinary radiology. Radiological Society of North America, Oak Brook, IL, 1994, pp 183-191
18. Sussman SK, Illescas FF, Opaalacz JP, et al: Renal streak artifact during contrast-enhanced CT: Comparison of low versus high osmolality contrast media. Abd Imag 18:180-185, 1993
19. Wilson TE, Doelle EA, Cohan RH, et al: Cystic renal masses: A reevaluation of the usefulness of the Bosniak classification system. Acad Radiol 3:564-570, 1996
20. Platt JF, Ellis JH, Korobkin M, et al: Potential renal donors: Comparison of conventional imaging with helical CT. Radiology 198:419-423, 1996