Genetic factors in the etiology of child psychiatric disorders

Current Opinion in Pediatrics

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 354-360

  Skuse, David H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHILD PSYCHIATRY; COGNITION; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; GENETIC LINKAGE; HUMAN; MENTAL DISEASE; NERVOUS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

EID: 0030845381     PISSN: 10408703     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00008480-199708000-00009     Document Type: Review

References (76)

1. King MC: Leaving Kansas - finding genes in 1997. Nat Genet 1997, 15:8-10. An interesting commentary on the steps involved in finding important human genes that are relatively easy to locate nowadays, as well as those that are difficult. Discusses recent progress in our understanding of the genetic basis of certain medical conditions and remarks on the dizzying rate of change in molecular genetics.
2. Simple minds and complex traits. Nat Genet 1996, 13:131-132.
3. Lander ES, Schork N: Genetic dissection of complex traits. Science 1994, 265:2037-2048.
4. Ott J: Complex traits on the map. Nature 1996, 379:772-773.
5. Kidd KK: Can we find genes for schizophrenia? Am J Med Genet 1997, 74:104-111.
6. Crow TJ: Current status of linkage for schizophrenia: polygenes of vanishingly small effect or multiple false positives? Am J Med Genet 1997, 74:99-103.
7. Risch N, Botstein D: A manic depressive history. Nat Genet 1996, 12:351-353.
8. Mynett-Johnson LA, McKeon P: The molecular genetics of affective disorders: an overview. Irish J Psychol Med 1996, 13:155-161.
9. Kendler KS: Parenting: a genetic-epidemiologic perspective. Am J Psychiatry 1996, 153:11-20. Presents evidence from a large twin study of the influences on the way in which we parent. It appears (not too surprisingly) that attitudes derived from the parent's family of origin and genetically determined personality characteristics interact with the temperamental traits of offspring, which are themselves partly under genetic control.
10. Eisenberg L: Seed or soil: how does our garden grow? Am J Psychiatry 1996, 153:3-5.
11. Rutter M: Nature-nurture integration. Am Psychol 1997, 52:290-398.
12. Cadoret RJ, Winokur G, Langbehn D, Troughton E, Yates WR, Stewart MA: Depression spectrum disease, I: the role of gene-environment interaction. Am J Psychiatry 1996, 153:892-899.
13. Bouchard TJ Jr: Genes, environment, and personality. Science 1994, 264:1700-1701.
14. Estivill X: Complexity in a monogenic disease. Nat Genet 1996, 12: 348-350.
15. Todd JA, Farrall M: Panning for gold: genome-wide scanning for linkage in type 1 diabetes. Hum Mol Genet 1996, 5:1443-1448. In many ways, type 1 insulin-dependent diabetes is the medical condition most similar in genetic etiology to what we expect to find in key child psychiatric disorders. Accordingly, the techniques used by Todd are worth studying in detail, and this article reviews recent progress in their elegant research program.
16. Frankel WN, Schork: Who's afraid of epistasis? Nat Genet 1996, 14:371-373.
17. Fijneman RJ, De Vries SS, Jansen RC, Demant P: Complex interactions of new quantitative trait loci, Sluc1, Sluc2, Sluc3, and Sluc4, that influence the susceptibility to lung cancer in the mouse. Nat Genet 1996, 14:465-467.
18. Van Wezel T, Stassen AP, Moen CH, Hart AA, Van Der Valk MA, Demant P: Gene interaction and single gene effects in colon tumour susceptibility in mice. Nat Genet 1996, 14:468-470.
19. Rutter M: Psychiatric genetics: research challenges and pathways forward. Am J Med Genet 1994, 54:185-198.
20. Plomin R, Defries JC, McClearn GE, Rutter M: Behavioral Genetics. WH Freeman; 1997.
21. Lasch KP, Bengel D, Heils A, Sabol SZ, Greenberg BD, Petri S, Benjamin J, Muller CR, Hamer DH, Murphy DL: Association of anxiety-related traits with a polymorphism in the serotonin transporter gene regulatory region. Science 1996, 274:1527-1531. Starting from the principle that neurotransmission mediated by 5-HT (serotonin) contributes to many physiologic functions; cognition; and emotional states, including anxiety, the authors thought that the 5-HT transporter might play a role in the fine tuning of serotoninergic transmission in the brain. Expression of that gene had been shown to occur in regions of the brain, such as the limbic system, that are known to play a role in emotional regulation. The authors identified two alleles of the transporter, one of which was transcribed less efficiently than the other and therefore made less protein, leading to reduced serotonin uptake. Reduced uptake, and hence increased serotoninergic transmission, is anxiogenic in animal models as well as humans. Gene-trait associations were found not only in a general population sample, where population stratification could have accounted for the association, but also in a separate study of sibling pairs with discordant genotypes.
22. Goldman D: High anxiety. Science 1996, 274:1483.
23. Leach K-P, Bengel D, Heils A, Sabol SZ, Greenberg BD, Petri S, Benjamin J, Muller CR, Hamer DH, Murphy DL: Association of anxiety-related traits with a polymorphism in the serotonin transporter gene regulatory region. Science 1996, 274:1527-1530.
24. Hamer DH: The heritability of happiness. Nat Genet 1996, 14:125-126.
25. Ebstein RP, Novick O, Umansky R, Priel B, Osher Y, Blaine D, Bennett ER, Nemanov L, Katz M, Belmaker RH: Dopamine D4 receptor (D4DR) exon III polymorphism associated with the human personality trait of Novelty Seeking. Nat Genet 1996, 12:78-80. The possibility that novelty-seeking behaviors could be related to dopamine activity is theoretically based on the results of animal studies (exploratory approach behavior), the effects of dopamine agonists in humans (the stimulation of euphoria, for example), and observations that persons with Parkinson's disease are both dopamine deficient and low in novelty seeking. Twin studies had shown that key temperament dimensions, including Novelty Seeking, Harm Avoidance, Reward Dependence, and Persistence, are moderately heritable (40%-60%).
26. Benjamin J, Li L, Patterson C, Greenberg BD, Murphy DL, Hamer DH: Population and familial association between the D4 dopamine receptor gene and measures of Novelty Seeking. Nat Genet 1996, 12:81-84. This study investigated the relationship between D4DR exon III sequence variants and personality test scores in a large population sample. The association between long alleles of exon III and personality traits related to novelty seeking, reported by Ebstein et al. [25], were confirmed. The association appears to be a result of genetic transmission rather than population stratification.
27. Moisan MP, Courvoisier H, Bihoreau MT, Gauguier D, Hendley ED, Lathrop M, James MR, Mormede P: A major quantitative trait locus influences hyperactivity in the WKHA rat. Nat Genet 1996, 14:471-473.
28. Cook EH Jr, Stein MA, Krasowski MD, Cox NJ, Olkon DM, Kieffer JE, Leventhal BL: Association of attention-deficit disorder and the dopamine transporter gene. Am J Hum Genet 1995, 56:993-998.
29. Hess EJ, Collins KA, Wilson MC: Mouse model of hyperkinesis implicates SNAP-25 in behavioral regulation. J Neurosci 1996, 16:3104-3111.
30. LaHoste GJ, Swanson JM, Wigal SB, Glabe C, Wigal T, King N, Kennedy JL: Dopamine D4 receptor gene polymorphism is associated with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Mol Psychiatry 1996, 1:121-124.
31. Comings DE, Wu S, Chiu C, Ring RH, Gade R, Ahn C, Macmurray JP, Dietz G, Muhleman D: Polygenic inheritance of Tourette syndrome, stuttering, attention deficit hyperactivity, conduct, and oppositional defiant disorder: the additive and subtractive effect of the three dopaminergic genes-DRD2, DβH, and DAT1. Am J Med Genet 1996, 67:264-288. Evidence is presented to show that polymorphisms of three different dopaminergic genes show a significant correlation with behavioral features and that each gene, when examined individually, showed a significant but modest effect upon many of the same behaviors. The conclusion is reached that the Tourette's syndrome has a polygenic mode of inheritance and the exact mode of clinical presentation depends on the relative contributions of these modes in any one person.
32. Boghosian-Sell L, Comings DE, Overhauser J: Tourette syndrome in a pedigree with a 7;18 translocation: identification of a YAC spanning the translocation breakpoint at 18q22.3. Am J Hum Genet 1996, 59:999-1005.
33. Barr CL, Wigg KG, Sovko E, Sandor P, Tsui L-C: No evidence for a major gene effect of the dopamine D4 receptor gene in the susceptibility to Gilles de la Tourette syndrome in five Canadian familles. Am J Med Genet 1996, 67:301-305.
34. Grice DE, Leckman JF, Pauls DL, Kurlan R, Kidd KK, Pakstis AJ, Chang FM, Buxbaum JD, Cohen DJ, Gelernter J: Linkage disequilibrium between an allele at the dopamine D4 receptor locus and Tourette syndrome, by the transmission-disequilibrium test. Am J Hum Genet 1996, 59:644-652.
35. Walkup JT, Labuda MC, Singer HS, Brown J, Riddle MA, Hurko O: Family study and segregation analysis of Tourette syndrome: evidence for a mixed model of inheritance. Am J Hum Genet 1996, 59:684-693.
36. Wolf SS, Jones DW, Knable MB, Gorey JG, Lee KS, Hyde TM, Coppola R, Weinberger DR: Tourette syndrome: prediction of phenotypic variation in monozygotic twins by caudate nucleus D2 receptor binding. Science 1996, 273:1225-1227.
37. Szatmari P, Jones MB, Holden J, Bryson S, Mahoney W, Tuff L, Maclean J, White B, Bartolucci G, Schutz C, et al.: High phenotypic correlations among siblings with autism and pervasive developmental disorders. Am J Med Genet 1996, 67:354-360.
38. Hallmayer J, Spiker D, Lotspeich L, Mcmahon WM, Petersen PB, Nicholas P, Pingree C, Ciaranello RD: Male-to-male transmission in extended pedigrees with multiple cases of autism. Am J Med Genet 1996, 67:13-18.
39. Jones MB, Szatmari P, Piven J: Nonfamiliality of the sex ratio in autism. Am J Med Genet 1996, 67:499-500.
40. Le Couteur A, Bailey A, Goode S, Pickles A, Robertson S, Gottesman I, Rutter M: A broader phenotype of autism: the clinical spectrum in twins. J Child Psychol Psychiat 1996, 7:785-802.
41. Bailey A, Philips W, Rutter M: Autism: towards an integration of clinical genetic, neuropsychological and neurobiological perspectives. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1996, 37:89-126. A key review on recent research that could improve our understanding of autism. The authors attempt to devise a unitary hypothesis. Little progress has been made in discovering the genetic basis of this strongly heritable disorder, despite heroic efforts, suggesting that the strategies used to date require reevaluation.
42. Pickles A, Bolton P, MacDonald H, Bailey A, LeCouteur A, Sim C-H, Rutter M: Latent-class analysis of recurrence risks for complex phenotypes with selection and measurement error: a twin and family history study of autism. Am J Hum Genet 1995, 57:717-726.
43. Craddock N, Owen MJ: Modern molecular approaches to psychiatric disease. Br Med Bull 1996, 52:434-452. A very accessible introduction for those with minimal knowledge of genetics. Emphasis is placed on adult psychiatric disorders as exemplars of complex disease.
44. Ginsburg BE, Werick TM, Escobar JI, Kugelmass S, Treanor JJ, Wendtland L: Molecular genetics of psychopathologies: a search for simple answers to complex problems. Behav Genet 1996, 26:325-333.
45. Keefe RSE, Silverman JM, Mohs RC, Siever LJ, Harvey PD, Friedman L, Roitman SEL, Dupre RL, Smith CJ, Schmeidler J, et al.: Eye tracking, attention, and schizotypal symptoms in nonpsychotic relatives of patients with schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1997, 54:169-176.
46. Freedman R, Coon H, Myles-Worsley M, Orr-Urtreger A, Olincy A, Davis A, Polymeropoulos M, Holik H, Hopkins J, Hoff M, et al.: Linkage of a neurophyslological deficit in schizophrenia to a chromosome 15 locus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997, 94:587-592.
47. McInnis MG: Anticipation: an old idea in new genes. Am J Hum Genet 1996, 59:973-979.
48. Korneluk RG, Narang MA: Anticipating anticipation. Nat Genet 1997, 15:119-120.
49. Gu Y, Shen Y, Gibbs RA, Nelson DL: Identification of FMR2, a novel gene associated with the FRAXE CCG repeat and CpG island. Nat Genet 1996, 13:109-113.
50. Gecz J, Gedeon AK, Sutherland GR, Mulley J: Identification of the gene FMR2, associated with FRAXE mental retardation. Nat Genet 1996, 13:105-107.
51. Reiss AL, Freund LS, Baumgardner TL, Abrams MT, Denckla MB: Contribution of the FMR1 gene mutation to human intellectual dysfunction. Nat Genet 1995, 12:331-334. A very well-written and concise paper. Discusses the genetic basis for intellectual deficits in female carriers of the fragile X mutation and shows that this is proportionate to the X chromosome inactivation pattern in females with the full mutation rather than to the size of the CGG triplet repeat expansion in the FMR1 gene.
52. DeVries BB, Wiegers AM, Smits AP, Mohkamsing S, Duivenvoorden HJ, Fryns JP, Curfs LM, Halley DJ, Oostra BA, Van Den Ouweland AM, et al.: Mental status of females with an FMR1 gene full mutation. Am J Hum Genet 1996, 58:1025-1032.
53. Barlow DP: Gametic imprinting in mammals. Science 1995, 270:1610-1613.
54. Ledbetter DH, Engel E: Uniparental disomy in humans: development of an imprinting map and its implications for prenatal diagnosis. Hum Mol Genet 1995, 4:1757-1764.
55. Ferguson-Smith AC: Imprinting moves to the centre. Nat Genet 1996, 14:119-121.
56. Simonoff E, Bolton P, Rutter M: Mental retardation: genetic findings, clinical implications and research agenda. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1996, 3:259-280. Reviews the latest research on genetic mechanisms that are associated with mental retardation, including imprinting and triplet repeat expansions. Makes the important point that recent discoveries in molecular genetics and cytogenetics indicate that there is no simple association between mild, moderate, or severe mental retardation and the likelihood of finding such pathology. Also emphasizes that the effect of environmental influences on children predisposed to learning difficulties is an important area of research in its own right.
57. Flint J, Wilkie AOM: The genetics of mental retardation. Br Med Bull 1996, 52:453-464.
58. Roemer I, Reik W, Dean W, Klose J: Epigenetic inheritance in the mouse. Curr Biol 1996, 17:277-280.
59. Keverne EB, Fundele R, Naraimha M, Barton SC, Surani MA: Genomic imprinting and the differential roles of parental genomes in brain development. Dev Brain Res 1996, 92:91-100. Certain genes are expressed either from the maternal or the paternal genome as a consequence of imprinting; this article reports extraordinary findings on the cumulative effects of imprinted genes on brain development in the mouse, using a chimeric embryo as the experimental model. Androgenetic (duplicated paternal genome) cells contributed substantially to the hypothalamic structures but not to the cortex. Gynogenetic (duplicated maternal genome) cells contributed primarily to the cortex, striatum, and hippocampus but not to hypothalamic structures.
60. Cook EH, Lindgren V, Leventhal BL, Courchesne R, Lincoln A, Shulman C, Lord C, Courchesne E: Autism or atypical autism in maternally but not paternally derived proximal 15q duplication. Am J Hum Genet 1997, 60:928-934.
61. Skuse DH, James RS, Bishop DVM, Coppin B, Dalton P, Aamodt-Leeper G, Bacarese-Hamilton M, Creswell C, McGurk R, Jacobs PA: An imprinted X-linked locus affecting cognitive function: evidence from Turner syndrome. Nature 1997, 387:705-708. Evidence is presented for the existence of an imprinted locus on the X chromosome that influences the development of social-cognitive skills and associated higher cognitive functions. The presence of this locus may account, in part, for the evolution of sex differences in social perception and behavior. Its unusual mode of inheritance may explain why males in general are substantially more vulnerable than females to neurodevelopmental disorders associated with executive skill (prefrontal cortical) deficits, such as autism.
62. Andreasen NC: Linking mind and brain in the study of mental illnesses: a project for a scientific psychopathology. Science 1997, 275:1586-1593.
63. Judland HF: The Eighth Day of Creation. London: Penguin Books; 1995.
64. Cairns RB: Aggression from a developmental perspective: genes, environments and interactions. In Genetics of Criminal and Antisocial Behaviour. Edited by Bock CR, Goode JA. Wiley: Chichester (Ciba Foundation Symposium); 1996:45-60.
65. Pennington BF: Using genetics to dissect cognition. Am J Hum Genet 1997, 60:13-16. The author points out that we need to consider the relations between different levels of analysis to come to an integrated explanation of neurodevelopmental disorders. Genetic progress would be facilitated by refinement of the neurobehavioral phenotype. The first step in finding the genetic basis of complex disease will often be analysis of the phenotype itself. Usually, the phenotype studied in linkage or association studies will be relatively coarse from a cognitive perspective. It is therefore likely to be influenced by numerous underlying cognitive and genetic processes.
66. Grigorenko EL, Wood FB, Meyer MS, Hart LA, Speed WC, Shuster A, Pauls DL: Susceptibility loci for distinct components of developmental dyslexia on chromosomes 6 and 15. Am J Hum Genet 1997, 60:27-39. Meticulous research into the cognitive processes that are disrupted in dyslexia has shown that certain dyslexics have a deficit in phonologic decoding and consequently have slower and less accurate single-word recognition. They are also lacking in phonologic awareness and have difficulty segmenting phonemes to read an alphabetic language, such as English. The authors claim that cognitively dissociable components of the reading process are linked to separate genes and that the mapping from genes to aspects of cognition may be quite close. In other words, the hypothetical gene on chromosome 6 influences the development of phonologic awareness, but not single-word reading. On the other hand, the linkage on chromosome 15 (rather weaker, it must be said) is to the skill of single-word reading. There is, arguably, a dissociation between phonologic awareness and decoding and between phonologic awareness and single-word reading in the sample studied. Yet phonologic decoding and single-word reading were strongly correlated with one another.
67. Dronkers NF: A new brain region for coordinating speech articulation. Nature 1996, 384:159-161.
68. Frangiskakis JM, Ewart AK, Morris CA, Mervis CB, Bertrand J, Robinson BF, Klein BP, Ensing GJ, Everett LA, Green ED, et al.: LIM-kinase1 hemizygosity implicated in impaired visuospatial constructive cognition. Cell 1996, 86:59-69. These authors showed that submicroscopic chromosome 7q11.23 deletions associated with a partial Williams syndrome phenotype [59] cosegregated with poor visuospatial skills in two families. They hypothesized that the Williams syndrome was a contiguous gene deletion syndrome in which a typical cognitive profile includes a weakness in pattern construction and a strength in digit recall relative to performance on other nonverbal subtests. They tested the specific hypothesis that hemizygosity of a gene encoding a protein kinase that lay immediately 3′ of the elastin gene ELN could be responsible for the cognitive profile, because mouse models with protein kinase gene disruption had already been shown to have impaired visuospatial skills. LIMK1 (which is expressed widely in the cerebral cortex) mapped close to ELN locus and, in persons with the partial syndrome, the deletion extended to include that locus as well. Persons with the full Williams syndrome phenotype had much more extensive deletions that included both of the above genes, but LIMK1 was not deleted in persons with autosomal dominant supravalvular aortic stenosis only, in whom only the ELN gene was deleted (this gene is not expressed in the brain).
69. Ashkenas J: Williams syndrome starts making sense. Am J Hum Genet 1996, 59:756-761.
70. Monaco AP: Human genetics-dissecting Williams syndrome. Curr Biol 1996, 6:1396-1398.
71. Temple CM, Carney RA: Patterns of spatial functioning in Tourette's syndrome. Cortex 1995, 31:109-118.
72. Silva AJ, Frankland PW, Marowitz Z, Friedman E, Lazlo G, Cioffi D, Jacks T, Bourtchuladze R: A mouse model for the learning and memory deficits associated with neurofibromatosis type 1. Nat Genet 1997, 15:281-284.
73. Carlson C, Papolos RK, Pandita GL, Faedda S, Veil R, Goldberg R, Sprintzen RJ, Kucherlapati R, Morrow B: Molecular analysis of Velo-Cardio-Facial syndrome patients with psychiatric disorders. Am J Hum Genet 1997, 60:851-859. Discusses the increasing evidence for the existence of a substantially increased risk for behavioral disorders in children with the velo-cardio-facial syndrome, which is caused by hemizgous deletions within 22q11. Adults with this syndrome are likely to develop a variety of serious mental illnesses, especially bipolar affective disorder, which often present initially during adolescence. A fascinating microdeletion syndrome, the further study of which could lead to the discovery of candidate genes for a major psychiatric disorder.
74. Flint J: Annotation. Behavioural phenotypes: a window into the biology of behaviour. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1996, 37:355-368.
75. Patel PI: Quest for the elusive genetic basis of Tourette syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 1996, 59:980-982.
76. Gazzaniga MS: The Cognitive Neurosciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1995.