Tight binding of a dimeric derivative of vancomycin with dimeric L-Lys-D-Ala-D-Ala

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 119, Issue 43, 1997, Pages 10286-10290

  Rao, Jianghong ^a   Whitesides, George M ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

VANCOMYCIN DERIVATIVE;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; ELECTROPHORETIC MOBILITY; EQUILIBRIUM CONSTANT; FLUORESCENCE; IN VITRO STUDY; MODEL; RECEPTOR BINDING;

EID: 0030708920     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja971225l     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. -1; the enhancement was therefore a factor of 300.
2. Beeson, J. C.; Czarnik, A. W. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1994, 2, 297-303.
3. Venema, F.; Rowan, A. E.; Nolle, R. J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 257-258.
4. x dimer required to block adhesion of 50% of the cells was 0.2 mM, and the value for the tetrasaccharide monomer was 1.2 mM.
5. Spencer, D. M.; Wandless, T. J.; Schreiber, S. L.; Crabtree, G. R. Science 1993, 262, 1019-1024.
6. 4.
7. Hornick, C. L.; Karush, F. Immunochemistry 1972, 9, 325-340.
8. Nieto, M.; Perkins, H. R. Biochem. J. 1971, 123, 773-787.
9. Nieto, M.; Perkins, H. R. Biochem. J. 1971, 123, 789-803.
10. Sheldrich, G. M.; Jones, P. G.; Kennard, O.; Williams, D. H.; Smith, G. A. Nature 1978, 271, 223-224.
11. Sheldrick, G. M.; Paulus, E.; Vertesy, L.; Hahn, F. Acta Crystallogr. 1995, B51, 89-98.
12. Popieniek, P. H.; Pratt, R. F. Anal. Biochem. 1987, 165, 108-113.
13. Loll, P. J.; Bevivino, A. E.; Korty, B. D.; Axelsen, P. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 1516-1522.
14. Chu, Y.-H.; Whitesides, G. M. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 3524-3525.
15. Pierce, C. M.; Williams, D. H. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1995, 2, 153-157.
16. Williams, D. H.; Williamson, M. P.; Butcher, D. W.; Hammond, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 1332-1339.
17. Kannan, R.; Harris, C. M.; Harris, T. M.; Waltho, G. P.; Skelton, N. J.; Williams, D. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 2946-2953.
18. Bongini, A.; Feeney, J.; Williamson, M. P.; Williams, D. H. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1981, 201-206.
19. Shi, Z.; Griffin, J. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 6482-6486.
20. Sundram, U. N.; Griffin, J. H. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 1102-1103.
21. Sundram, U. N.; Griffin, J. H.; Nicas, T. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 13107-13108.
22. Beauregard, D. A.; Williams, D. H.; Gwynn, M. N.; Knowles, D. J. C. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1995, 39, 781-785.
23. Gerhard, U.; Mackay, J. P.; Maplestone, R. A.; Williams, D. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 232-237.
24. Groves, P.; Searle, M. S.; Waltho, J. P.; Williams, D. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 7958-7964.
25. Mackay, J. P.; Gerhard, U.; Beaurgard, D. A.; Westwell, M. S.; Searle, M. S.; Williams, D. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 4581-4890.
26. Westwell, M. S.; Bardsley, B.; Dancer, R. J.; Try, A. C.; Williams, D. H. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1996, 589-590.
27. For review of general principles of ACE, see: Chu, Y.-H.; Avila, L.; Gao, J.; Whitesides, G. M. Acc. Chem. Res. 1995, 28, 461-468 and references therein.
28. At 280 nm, P has little UV absorbance. This value was an average of three independent runs, determined by UV difference spectroscopy according to the literature reported method (ref 8).
29. d-L should, therefore, not change the electrophoretic mobility μ.
30. See Supporting Information for detailed derivations.
31. Page, M. I.; Jencks, W. P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1971, 68, 1678-1683.
32. Dourtolou, V.; Gross, B.; Lambropoulou, V.; Zioudrou, C. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1984, 572-274.