Neutral theory of molecular evolution

Current Opinion in Genetics and Development

Volumn 6, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 767-772

  Takahata, Naoyuki ^a  

^a GRADUATE UNIVERSITY FOR ADVANCED STUDIES   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA;

ADAPTATION; DNA POLYMORPHISM; DNA SEQUENCE; EVOLUTION; NATURAL SELECTION; NEUTRAL GENE THEORY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

EID: 0030467030     PISSN: 0959437X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-437X(96)80034-7     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. 1. Kimura M: Evolutionary rate at the molecular level. Nature 1968, 217:624-626.
2. 2. Kimura M: Population Genetics, Molecular Evolution, and The Neutral Theory. Edited by N Takahata. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1994.
3. 3. Zuckerkandl E, Pauling P: Molecules as documents of evolutionary history. J Theor Biol 1965, 8:357-366.
4. 4. Britten RJ: Rates of DNA sequence evolution differ between taxonomic groups. Science 1986, 231:1393-1398.
5. 5. Haldane JBS: The mutation rate of the gene for haemophilia, and its segregation ratios in males and females. Ann Eugen 1947, 13:262-271.
6. 6. Miyata T, Hayashida H, Kuma K, Mitsuyasa K, Yasunaga T: Male-driven molecular evolution: a model and nucleotide sequence analysis. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 1987, 52:863-867.
7. 7. Chang BHJ, Li WH: Estimating the intensity of male-driven evolution in rodents by using X-linked and Y-linked Ube 1 genes and pseudogenes. J Mol Evol 1995, 40:70-77. This paper provides the second set of compelling evidence that the male-to-female ratio of mutation rate in rodents (mice and rats) is -2, which is close to the ratio of the numbers of germ cell divisions in males and females [8].
8. 8. Chang BHJ, Shimmin LC, Shyue SK, Hewett-Emmett D, Li WH: Weak male-driven molecular evolution in rodents. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994, 91:827-831.
9. 9. Prager EM, Brush AH, Nolan RA, Nakanishi M, Wilson AC: Slow evolution of transferrin and albumin in birds according to micro-complement fixation analysis. J Mol Evol 1974, 3:243-262.
10. 10. Martin AP: Metabolic rate and directional nucleotide substitution in animal mitochondrial DNA. Mol Biol Evol 1995, 12:1124-1131. This paper demonstrates a negative association between increase in specific metabolic rate and abundance of GC nucleotides at silent sites in mammalian mitochondrial DNA. Examination of mammals with similar body temperature but different metabolic rates allows the author to conclude that specific metabolic rate is an important factor which determines mammalian mitochondrial evolution [11•].
11. 11. Mindell DP, Knight A, Baer C, Huddlestone CJ: Slow rates of molecular evolution in birds and metabolic rate and body temperature hypotheses. Mol Biol Evol 1996, 13:422-426. The authors find that 12S rRNA genes of reptiles, birds and mammals evolve at a slower rate whereas the protein-coding region evolves slower in birds than in mammals. This finding cannot be explained either by the metabolic rate hypothesis or by the body temperature hypothesis.
12. 12. Sibley CG, Ahlquist JE: Reconstructing bird phylogeny by comparing DNAs. Sci Am 1986, 254:68-78.
13. 13. Li WH: Kimura's contributions to molecular evolution. Theor Popul Biol 1996, 49:146-153. This paper provides a brief summary of Kimura's contributions to the neutral theory, molecular clock, unification of population genetics and molecular evolution, and models of nucleotide substitution.
14. 14. Kimura M: Molecular evolutionary clock and the neutral theory. J Mol Evol 1987, 26:24-33.
15. 15. Gillespie JH: The Causes of Molecular Evolution. New York: Oxford University Press; 1991.
16. 16. Ohta T, Gillespie JH: Development of neutral and nearly neutral theories. Theor Popul Biol 1996, 49:128-142. A summary of molecular evolutionary studies written in chronological order from the 1960s. It is claimed that the nearly neutral theory can explain the widest range of phenomena, although it is highly model-dependent. This paper remarks that near-neutral no longer implies deleterious.
17. 17. Goldman N: Variance to mean ratio, R(t), for Poisson processes on phylogenetic trees. Mol Phylo Evol 1994, 3:230-239.
18. 18. Aquadro CF, Begun DJ, Kindahl EC: Selection, recombination, and DNA polymorphism in Drosophila. In Non-Neutral Evolution. Edited by Golding B. New York: Chapman & Hall; 1995:46-56. The authors demonstrate that levels of DNA variation at 15 gene regions of the third chromosome in D. melanogaster are well correlated with rate of recombination. A similar but weaker pattern is suggested for X-linked regions. This paper provides the strongest evidence supporting the hitchhiking effect.
19. 19. Braverman JM, Hudson RR, Kaplan NL, Langley CH, Stephan W: The hitchhiking effect on the site frequency spectrum of DNA polymorphisms. Genetics 1995, 140:783-796. Simulation study of a model of the effects of hitchhiking on the number of segregating sites at a neutral locus, concluding that the observed pattern of DNA polymorphism in regions of restricted recombination is more complex than the model predicts.
20. 20. Magnus N, Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D: The effect of recombination on background selection. Genet Res Camb 1996, 67:159-174. An analytical study of background selection, showing that it can produce a considerable reduction in genetic variability particularly when weakly selected mutations are involved,
21. 21. Hudson RR, Kaplan NL: Deleterious background selection with recombination. Genetics 1995, 141:1605-1617. This paper provides analytical results on background selection and an explanation of the low observed levels of variation at the tips of the third chromosome [18••], as an alternative to the hitchhiking hypothesis.
22. 22. Hudson RR, Kreitman M, Aguadé M: A test of neutral molecular evolution based on nucleotide data. Genetics 1987, 116:153-159.
23. 23. Moriyama EN, Powell JR: Intraspecific nuclear DNA variation in Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol 1996, 13:261-277. This paper summarizes all available data on nuclear DNA polymorphisms in Drosophila species. Silent nucleotide diversity is shown to range from 0% to 3.4% in D. melanogaster, from 0% to 8.0% in D. simulans, and from 0.5% to 4.1% in D. pseudoobscura, depending on the particular genes. The authors consider many causes for different silent nucleotide diversities within and between species but information on more loci seems necessary to make a definite conclusion.
24. 24. King MC, Wilson AC: Evolution at two levels: molecular similarities and biological differences between human and chimpanzee. Science 1975, 118:107-188.
25. 25. Bruce EJ, Ayala FJ: phylogenetic relationships between man and the apes: electrophoretic evidence. Evolution 1979, 33:1040-1056.
26. 26. Nei M, Graur D: Extent of protein polymorphism and the neutral theory. Evol Biol 1984, 17:73-118.
27. 27. Li WH, Sadler LA: Low nucleotide diversity in man. Genetics 1991, 129:513-523.
28. 28. Takahata N: Relaxed natural selection in human populations during the Pleistocene. Jpn J Genet 1993, 68:539-547.
29. 29. Takahata N, Satta Y, Klein J: Divergence time and population size in the lineage leading to modern humans. Theor Popul Biol 1995, 48:198-221. The authors use a maximum likelihood method to estimate simultaneously the species divergence time and the common ancestral population size from interspecific sequence divergence. This paper focuses on the phylogenetic relationship between human, chimpanzee and gorilla, concluding that the closest relative to the human is the chimpanzee rather than the gorilla. The authors also show, using autosomal DNA sequence data, that the effective size of the human population was -100000 before it diverged from the chimpanzee 4.6 million years ago.
30. 30. Takahata N: A genetic perspective on the origin and history of humans. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 1995, 26:343-372. A review of approaches to molecular anthropology on the basis of models of population genetics. Topics include the demographic history of primates in the Miocene and Pliocene eras, the problem of the apparent trichotomy among human, chimpanzee and gorilla, and the debate over the uniregional versus multiregional origin of modern humans.
31. 31. Cann RL, Stoneking M, Wilson AC: Mitochondrial DNA and human evolution. Nature 1987, 325:31-36.
32. 32. Cavalli-Sforza LL, Menozzi P, Piazza A: The History and Geography of Human Genes. New Jersey: Princeton University Press; 1995. A multi-disciplinary work on our rapidly vanishing genetic heritage which integrates population genetics, molecular genetics, geography, ecology, archaeology, and physical anthropology. The book contains the most extensive genetic data currently available and shows nicely how they are analyzed to elucidate human evolution. The expansion of prehistoric humans or natural selection for particular alleles is evident through the 518 genetic maps found in the index.
33. 33. Wolinsky SM, Korber BTM, Neumann AU, Daniels M, Kunstman KJ, Whetsell AJ, Furtado MR, Cao Y, Ho DD, Safrit JT, Koup RA: Adaptive evolution of human immunodeficiency virus type-1 during the natural course of infection. Science 1996, 272:537-542. This paper examines the hypothesis that the loss of CD4 T cells in HIV-1-infected individuals is primarily caused by increasing antigenic diversity [35•]. No such evidence is found, but adaptive evolution of virus populations under selective constraints is suggested.
34. 34. Nowak M, McMichael AJ: How HIV defeats the immune system. Sci Am 1995, 273:42-49. An evolutionary model to explain the combat between the generalist HIV army and specialist immune army offers a possible explanation for why some patients progress to AIDS more quickly than do others. The model suggests positive selection for viral diversity in epitopes recognized by immune forces.
35. 35. Mindell DP: Positive selection and rates of evolution in immunodeficiency viruses from humans and chimpanzees. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996, 93:3284-3288. A phylogenetic analysis of primate immunodeficiency virus genes, showing enhanced nonsynonymous substitution rates in its new host species, humans. This tendency is most conspicuous at the env gp120 locus which encodes for surface antigens. It is unclear, however, why the virus protein is positively selected only in the new host.
36. 36. Smith NH, Maynard Smith J, Spratt BG: Sequence evolution of the porB gene of Neisseria gonorrhoeare and Neisseria meningitidis: evidence of positive Darwinian selection. Mol Biol Evol 1995, 12:363-370. Evidence of an accelerated nonsynonymous rate in the major outer membrane protein, as expected, under positive selection in response to pressure from the immune system. This is found in N. gonorrhoeae but not in N. meningitidis. The loop region of this gene product in these bacteria which serves as epitopes may be subjected to different immune responses.
37. 37. Metz EC, Palumbi SR: Positive selection and sequence rearrangements generate extensive polymorphism in the gamete recognition protein bindin. Mol Biol Evol 1996, 13:397-406. This paper shows an accelerated nonsynonymous rate in a gamete recognition protein and high levels of polymorphism in contrast to no polymorphism in abalone lysin; however, the cause for this discrepancy remains speculative.
38. 1-proteinase inhibitors in mammals. Mol Biol Evol 1996, 13:346-358. Evidence for an accelerated nonsynonymous rate within the reactive centre of the serpin protein. The accelerated rate is, however, found in murids only. In primates and artiodactyls, the same gene is subjected to purifying selection. It is interesting to elucidate how such species-specificity arises.
39. 39. Hughes AL: The evolution of the type I Interferon gene family in mammals. J Mol Evol 1995, 41:539-548. Interferon-α and interferon-β are subject to negative selection, but an excess of radical amino acid changes in a domain of interferon-ω relative to conservative changes suggests positive selection.
40. 40. Kreitman M, Akashi H: Molecular evidence for natural selection. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 1995, 26:403-432. The authors argue that no current theories can account for all aspects of molecular evolution, and calls for a comprehensive theory. This conclusion is based largely on statistical tests of Drosophila genetic data. To demonstrate natural selection at the molecular level convincingly, however, we need to integrate into the framework of population genetics more information about the function and structure of molecules.
41. 41. Dodds PN, Clarke AE, Newbigin E: A molecular perspective on pollination in flowering plants. Cell 1996, 85:141-144. The molecular basis of self-incompatibility in Brassicaceae and Solanaceae are concisely reviewed here, concluding that there is a need to identify factors controlling pollen phenotype and the nature of the interactions between stylar and pollen components.
42. 42. Parham P, Ohta T: Population biology of antigen presentation by MHC class I molecules. Science 1996, 272:67-74. A review of both experimental and theoretical population genetics studies of extraordinarily high diversity at the MHC. A significant, though controversial, role of interallelic recombination and conversion is emphasized in the process of generating class I MHC diversity. The contention that many South Amerindian B alleles derive from founding alleles by interallelic conversion may be regarded as tentative until a thorough survey is made of Asian populations.
43. 43. Hinata K, Watanabe M, Yamakawa S, Satta Y, Isogai A: Evolutionary aspects of the S-related genes of the brassica self-incompatibility system: synonymous and nonsynonymous base substitutions. Genetics 1995, 140:1099-1104. Analysis of all available DNA sequences for SRK (S-receptor ktnase), SLG (S-locus glycoprotein), and two S-related genes (SRA and SRB) show the order of gene duplication and early SLG allelic divergences.
44. 44. Richman AD, Kao TH, Schaeffer SW, Uyenoyama MK: S-allele sequence diversity in natural populations of Solanum carolinense (Horsenettle). Heredity 1995, 75:405-415. Despite a rather small number of S alleles maintained in two natural populations, numerous sequence differences are found, presumably reflecting trans-species maintenance of polymorphism.
45. 45. Richman AD, Uyenoyama MK, Kohn JR: Contrasting patterns of allelic diversity and gene genealogy at the self-incompatibility locus in two species of Solanaceae. Science 1996, 273:1212-1216. 12 and 28 alleles recovered from Solanum carolinense and Physalis crassifolia populations are used to infer their demographic histories and modes of speciation.
46. 46. Uyenoyama MK: A generalized statistical estimate for the origin of sporophytic self-incompatibility. Genetics 1995, 139:975-992. Amino acid sequences of the proteins encoded by SLG and related genes were analyzed by a newly developed least-squares method to infer the age of the Sl system in Brassica and the trans-specific evolution of S alleles.
47. 47. Klein J, O'hUigin C: Class II B Mhc motifs in an evolutionary perspective, Immunol Rev 1995, 1143:89-111. Two possible explanations for the sharing of sequences motifs by different species - recombination and convergence - are discussed and forceful arguments for the latter are presented. The recurrent occurrence and/or long persistence of particular motifs in the peptide-binding region may result from the specific association between host and parasite.
48. 48. Zangenberg G, Huang MM, Arnheim N, Erlich H: New HLA-DPB1 alleles generated by interallelic gene conversion detected by analysis of sperm. Nat Genet 1995, 10:407-414. This paper presents the first direct measurements of the rate of new variant DPB1 sequences generated by gene conversion between two parental alleles. The estimated conversion tract is 54-132 bp.
49. 49. Griffiths RC, Tavarè S: Sampling theory for neutral alleles in a varying environment Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 1994, 344:403-410.
50. 50. Austerlitz F, Jung-Muller B, Godelle B, Gouyon PH: Evolution of coalescence times, genetic diversity and structure during colonization. Theor Popul Biol 1996, in press. Under a non-equilibrium model of geographically arranged colonies, the authors analyze mean coalescence times and two other related quantities. A recent colonization process, which is common in temperate forest trees, is the main focus.
51. 51. Slatkin M: Gene genealogy within mutant allelic classes. Genetics 1996, 143:579-587. A description of the genealogical process within an allelic class which arose by a unique mutational event is developed on the basis of the coalescence theory for a population of varying size [49].
52. 52. Wakeley J: The variance of pairwise nucleotide differences in two populations with migration. Theor Popul Biol 1996, 49:39-57. The variance formulae of nucleotide differences between genes are obtained in this study when two equilibrium populations exchange genes. Migration results in large standard errors on estimates of population genetic parameters, on the basis of which the author makes an interesting suggestion to distinguish between alternative demographic situations.
53. 53. Wakeley J: Distinguishing migration from isolation using the variance of pairwise differences. Theor Popul Biol 1996, 49:369-386. Ongoing gene flow between populations and a recent population split have similar - but not exactly the same - effects on gene genealogy. This paper suggests one way to distinguish between these two situations. The test statistic developed here is applied to mitochondrial stickleback DNA sequence data and suggests ongoing migration.
54. 54. Slatkin M: A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies. Genetics 1996, 139:3457-3462.
55. 55. Tachida H: A population genetic study of the evolution of SINEs. II. Sequence evolution under the master copy model. Genetics 1996, 143:1033-1042.
56. 56. Horai S, Hayasaka K, Kondo R, Tsugane K, Takahata T: Recent African origin of modern humans revealed by complete sequences of hominoid mitochondrial DNAs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995, 92:532-536.
57. 57. Hammer MF: A recent common ancestry for human Y chromosomes. Nature 1995, 378:376-378. Interesting sequence analysis on a polymorphic Alu element which was inserted into the human Y chromosome after the divergence of humans and chimpanzees. This paper also summarizes the extent of DNA polymorphism and sequence divergences at various loci, providing no evidence for recent selective sweeps in the human population.
58. 58. Dorit RL, Akashi H, Gilbert W: Absence of polymorphism at the ZFY locus on the human Y chromosome. Science 1995, 268:1183-1185. In a world-wide sample of 38 human males, no variation in a 729 bp intron of the ZFY gene is found. As for the estimate of the age of the MRCA, several comments were made recently [59•].
59. 59. Fu YX, Li WH: Estimating the age of the common ancestor of men from the ZFY intron. Science 1996, 272:1356-1357. The posterior probability of the age of the MRCA is derived, given that there is no variation in the sample, a suggestion of an age compatible with other estimates.
60. 60. Gillespie JH: On Ohta's hypothesis: most amino acid substitutions are deleterious. J Mol Evol 1995, 40:64-69. A model of near-neutrality is shown here to be incompatible with most of the major features of protein evolution but not with a model of evolution by exclusively deleterious mutations. This is an ironic paper from the proponent of the slightly deleterious theory who subsequently abandoned it [16•], recently developing the near-neutral theory.