Allelic diversity and gene genealogy at the self-incompatibility locus in the solanaceae

Science

Volumn 273, Issue 5279, 1996, Pages 1212-1216

  Richman, Adam D ^a   Uyenoyama, Marcy K ^b   Kohn, Joshua R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; ECOLOGY; FOUNDER EFFECT; GENE LOCUS; GENEALOGY; GENETIC SELECTION; NONHUMAN; PLANT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;

MAGNOLIOPHYTA; SOLANACEAE;

EID: 0029787713     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.273.5279.1212     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. S. Wright, Genetics 24, 538 (1939).
2. N, Takahata, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 87, 2419 (1990).
3. A. G. Clark, in Mechanisms of Molecular Evolution, N. Takahata and A. G. Clark, Eds. (Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, 1993), pp. 79-108.
4. N. Takahata and M. Nei, Genetics 124, 967 (1990).
5. M. J. Lawrence, M. D. Lane, S. O'Donnell, V. E. Franklin-Tong, Heredity 71, 581 (1993); D. A. Levin, ibid., p. 193; S. Emerson, Evolution 24, 524 (1939).
6. M. J. Lawrence, M. D. Lane, S. O'Donnell, V. E. Franklin-Tong, Heredity 71, 581 (1993); D. A. Levin, ibid., p. 193; S. Emerson, Evolution 24, 524 (1939).
7. M. J. Lawrence, M. D. Lane, S. O'Donnell, V. E. Franklin-Tong, Heredity 71, 581 (1993); D. A. Levin, ibid., p. 193; S. Emerson, Evolution 24, 524 (1939).
8. A. D. Richman, M. K. Uyenoyama, J. Kohn, Heredity, in press.
9. T. R. loerger, J. R. Gohlke, B. Xu, T.-h. Kao, Sex. Plant Reprod. 4, 81 (1991).
10. T. R. loerger, A. G. Clark,T.-h. Kao, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 87, 9732 (1990). The time since divergence was estimated by applying a molecular clock to divergence in ribulose-1, 5-bisphosphate carboxylase sequences.
11. N. Takahata, in (3), pp. 1-21.
12. X. Vekemans and M. Slatkin, Genetics 137, 1157 (1994).
13. D. Klein et al., Nature 364, 330 (1993).
14. J. Klein, Y. Satta, N. Takahata, C. O'hUigin, J. Med. Primatol. 22, 57 (1993).
15. S. Yokoyama and L. E. Hetherington, Heredity 48, 299 (1982).
16. A. D. Richman, T.-h. Kao, S. W. Schaeffer, M. K. Uyenoyama, ibid. 75, 405 (1995).
17. 2 = 10.36, P > 0.5). A significant but marginal deviation was detected in the P. crassifolia sample. A less biased estimator when allele frequencies are unequal gave the same estimated number of alleles (6).
18. a equal to the estimated number of alleles in the population, determined from Eq. 2.
19. 2 (190 df) = 178, P > 0.5]. Accordingly, intraspecific phytogenies of allelic sequences were constructed, and the means and variances of the lengths of terminal branches were estimated. Again, one or more closely related sequences in P. crassifolia were omitted. Because P. crassifolia sequences are in general more closely related, this procedure resulted in a conservative test. Sequences examined in P. crassifolia were sequences PcS1-9, PcS11-13, PcS16, and PcS20-22.
20. s = 0.90).
21. A. G. Clark and T.-h. Kao, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88, 9823 (1991).
22. K. Hinata, M. Watanabe, S. Yamakawa, Y. Satta, A. Isogai, Genetics 140, 1099 (1995).
23. R. G. Olmstead and J. A. Sweere, Syst. Biol. 43, 467 (1994).
24. N. Takahata, Mol. Biol. Evol. 10, 2 (1993).
25. 6, assuming that Nicotiana diverged from Physalis and Solanum 30 million years ago and a generation time of 2 years (see text).
26. An S lineage was considered trans-generic if it inserted into the S-gene genealogy at a position ancestral to an allele found in Nicotiana [or Petunia, a more distantly related genus in the Solanaceae (21)]. The sensitivity of this estimate to uncertainty in the phylogeny was examined by use of the bootstrap. The data were resampled 100 times with replacement, and the number of transgeneric lineages was determined for each replicate.
27. D. Lewis, Heredity 5, 399 (1951).
28. S. Wright, Biometrics 16, 61 (1960).
29. M. D. Lane and M. J. Lawrence, Heredity 71, 596 (1993).
30. S. O'Donnell, M. D. Lane, M. J. Lawrence, ibid., p. 591.
31. G. J. Paxman, Genetics 48, 1029 (1963).
32. N. Mantel, Biometrics 30, 355 (1974).
33. M. K. Uyenoyama, Genetics 139, 975 (1995).
34. M. Nei and L. Jin, Mol. Biol. Evol. 6, 290 (1989); A. L. Hughes and M. Nei, Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. U.S.A. 86, 958 (1989).
35. M. Nei and L. Jin, Mol. Biol. Evol. 6, 290 (1989); A. L. Hughes and M. Nei, Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. U.S.A. 86, 958 (1989).
36. S. Kumar, K. Tamura, M. Nei, Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis package (Pennsylvania State University, 1993).
37. B. Xu, J. Mu, D. L. Nevins, P. Grun, T.-h. Kao, Mol. Gen. Genet. 224, 341 (1990).
38. M. K. Saba-El-Leil, S. Rivard, D. Morse, M. Cappadocia, Plant Mol. Biol. 24, 571 (1994).
39. H. Kaufmann, F. Salamini, R. D. Thompson, Mol. Gen. Genet. 226, 457 (1991).
40. J. Royo et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 91, 6511 (1994).
41. J. Royo, Y. Kowyama, A. E. Clarke, Plant Physiol. 105, 751 (1994).
42. I. K. Chung et al. , Plant Mol. Biol. 26, 757 (1994).
43. A. Kheyr-Pour et al., Sex. Plant Reprod. 3, 88 (1990).
44. Y. J. Ai, D. S. Tsai, T.-h. Kao, Plant Mol. Biol. 19, 523 (1992).
45. K. R. Clark, J. J. Okuley, P. D. Collins, T. L. Sims, Plant Cell 2, 815 (1990).
46. Y. Ai et al., Sex. Plant Reprod. 3, 130 (1990).
47. W. Jost, H. Bak, K. Glund, P. Terpstra, J. J. Beinteme, Eur. J. Biochem. 198, 1 (1991).
48. H. Ide, M. Kimura, M. Arai, G Funatsu, FEBS Lett. 284, 161 (1991).
49. J. D. Thompson, D. G. Higgins, T. J. Gibson, Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 4673 (1994).
50. J. Feisenstein, Phylip 3.5 (Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, 1993).
51. Supported by a grant from the Sloan Foundation (A.D.R.), NSF grants DEB-9404386 (A.D.R.), DEB-9306473 (J.R.K.), DEB-9527843 (J.R.K. and A.D.R.), a Hellman Fellowship (J.R.K.), and USPHS grant GM 37841 (M.K.U.). The assistance of the staff of the University of California Philip L. Boyd Deep Canyon Reserve is gratefully acknowledged.