Assessing student learning

Cell Biology Education

Volumn 1, Issue 1-2, 2002, Pages 11-15

  Sundberg, Marshall D ^a  

^a EMPORIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment; Biology education; Learning

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE; DATA BASE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERVIEW; LEARNING; LEARNING TEST; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUALITY CONTROL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STUDENT; ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; EDUCATION; FACTUAL DATABASE; METHODOLOGY; OBSERVATION; WRITING;

BIOLOGY; DATABASES, FACTUAL; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; INTERVIEWS; LEARNING; OBSERVATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; STUDENTS; WRITING;

EID: 0013110445     PISSN: 15367509     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1187/cbe.02-03-0007     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Angelo, T.A., and Cross, K.P. (1993). Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers, 2nd ed., San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2. Frechtling, J., and Westat, L.S., Eds. (1997). User-Friendly Handbook for Mixed Method Evaluations (NSF 97-153), Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
3. Hake, R.R. (2002). Lessons from the physics education reform effort. Conserv. Ecol. 5(2), 28. Available on-line at: http://www.consecol.org/vol5/ iss2/art28
4. Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., and Smith, K.A. (1991). Cooperative learning: increasing college faculty instructional productivity, ERIC-ASHE Higher Education Report No. 4, Washington DC: George Washington University.
5. Mazur, E. (1997). Peer Instruction: A User's Manual, New York: Prentice-Hall. Available online at: http://galileo.harvard.edu
6. Mintzes, J.L., Wandersee, J.H., and Novak, J.D. (1999). Assessing Science Understanding: A Human Constructivist View, New York: Academic Press.
7. Moncada, G.J. (1993). Do college investigative laboratories really work? A descriptive study of an investigative biology laboratory in action. M.A. thesis, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge.
8. Novak, J.D., and Gowin, D.B. (1984). Learning How to Learn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9. Perry, W.G., Jr. (1970). Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years, New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
10. Siebert, E.D., and McIntosh, W.J. (2001). College Pathways to the Science Education Standards, Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
11. Stevens, F., Lawrenz, F., and Sharp, L., (Frechtling, J., Ed.). (1993). User-Friendly Handbook for Project Evaluation: Science, Mathematics, Engineering and Technology Education (NSF 93-152), Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
12. Sundberg, M.D. (1997). Assessing the effectiveness of an investigative laboratory to confront common misconceptions in life sciences. In McNeal, A.P., and D'Avanzo, C., eds., Student-Active Science: Models of Innovation in College Science Teaching, Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace & Company.
13. Sundberg, M.D., and Moncada, G.J. (1994). Creating effective investigative laboratories for undergraduates. BioScience 44, 698-704.
14. Tashiro, J., and Rowland, P.McD. (1997). What works: empirical approaches to restructuring courses in biology and environmental sciences. In McNeal, A.P., and D'Avanzo, C., eds., Student-Active Science: Models of Innovation in College Science Teaching, Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace & Company.
15. Udovic, D., Morris, D., Dickman, A., Postlethwait, J., and Wetherwax, P. (2002). Workshop biology: demonstrating the effectiveness of active learning in an introductory biology course. BioScience 52, 272-281.
16. Wright, J.C., Millar, S.B., Kosciuk, S.A., Penberthy, D.L., Williams, P.H., and Wampold, B.E. (1998). A novel strategy for assessing the effects of curriculum reform on student competence. J. Chem. Educ. 75, 986-992.