Rewarding better teachers?: Performance related pay in schools

Educational Management Administration and Leadership

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 55-70

  Cutler, Tony ^b   Waine, Barbara ^a  

^a MIDDLESEX UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0012762038     PISSN: 17411432     EISSN: 17411440     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0263211X990271005     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Adamson, J. (1930) English Education 1789-1902.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Ball, S.J. (1990) Politics and Policy-Making in Education: Explorations in Policy Sociology. London: Routledge.
3. Bowring-Carr, C. (1996) 'Inspecting by the Book', in J. Ouston, P. Earley and B. Fidler (eds) OFSTED Inspections: The Early Experience. London: David Fulton.
4. Brehony, K. and Deem, R. (1995) 'School Governing Bodies: Reshaping Education in Their Own Image', Sociological Review43(1): 81-99.
5. Cannell, M. and Wood, S. (1992) Incentive Pay: Impact and Evolution. London: IPD and NEDO.
6. Carroll, H. (1992) 'School Effectiveness and School Attendance', School Effectiveness and SchoolImprovement3(4): 258-271.
7. Carvell, J. (1998) 'Blunkett in the Lead on Teacher Pay', Guardian, 21July.
8. Cutler, T. and Waine, B. (1998) Managing the Welfare State: The Politics of Public SectorManagement (Text and Sourcebook). Oxford: Berg.
9. Department for Education and Employment (1996) Education, England and Wales: The Education (School Information) (England) Regulations 1996. London: Department for Education and Employment.
10. Department for Education and Employment (1997a) Excellence in Schools(Cm. 3681). London: HMSO.
11. Department for Education and Employment (1997b) Publication of Information about SecondarySchools in Performance Tables in 1997(circular 7/97). London: Department for Education and Employment.
12. Department of Education and Science (1991) The Education (Pupils' Attendance) Regulations 1991(circular 11/91). London: Department of Education and Science.
13. Department of Health (1997) The New NHS(Cm. 3807). London: HMSO.
14. Dowling, B. and Richardson, R. (1997) 'Evaluating Performance-Related Pay for Managers in the NHS', International Journal of Human Resource Management8(3): 348-366.
15. Employment Department (1988) Employment for the 1990s(Cm. 540). London: HMSO.
16. Employment Department (1992) People, Jobs and Opportunities(Cm. 1810). London: HMSO.
17. Gabe, S. (1994) 'Truancy, its Measurement and Causation: A Brief Review of the Literature', in D. O'Keefe (ed.) Truancy in English Secondary Schools. London: HMSO.
18. Gilroy, P. and Wilcox, B. (1997) 'OFSTED Criteria and the Nature of Social Understanding: A Wittgensteinian Critique of the Practice of Educational Judgement', British Journal of Educational Studies45(1): 22-38.
19. Gray, J. (1997) 'A Bit of a Curate's Egg? Three Decades of Official Thinking about the Quality of Schools', British Journal of Educational Studies45(1): 4-21.
20. Griffiths, R. (1983) NHS Management Inquiry. London: Department of Health.
21. Hallam, S. (1996) Improving School Attendance. Oxford: Heinemann.
22. Hallam, S. (1997) Truancy: Can Schools Improve Attendance?Institute of Education Viewpoint No. 6. London: Institute of Education.
23. Hughes, G., Means, R. and Winch, C. (1997) 'An Inspector Calls: Regulation and Accountability in Three Public Services', Policy and Politics25(3): 299-313.
24. Income Data Services Report(1996) 'Public Sector Labour Market Survey Part 1', 725 (November): 25-32.
25. Income Data Services Report(1998) 'All Pay in Civil Service is Linked to Performance', 753 (January): 25-28.
26. Ironside, M. and Seifert, R. (1995) Industrial Relations in Schools. London: Routledge.
27. Jackson, M.P. (1997) 'The Impact of Discretionary Pay in UK Universities', Higher EducationReview9(2): 99-113.
28. Jenkins, K., Caines, K. and Jackson, A. (1988) Improving Management in Government: The NextSteps: Report to the Prime Minister. London: HMSO.
29. Jesson, D. (1996) Value Added Measures of School Performance. Department for Education and Employment Research Study No. 14. London: HMSO.
30. Judd, J. (1998) 'Teachers need Pay Incentives, says Union', Independent, 17June.
31. Kirkpatrick, I. and Martinez Lucio, M. (1996) The Politics of Quality in the Public Sector: TheManagement of Change. London: Routledge.
32. McPherson, A. (1993) 'Measuring Added Value in Schools', in National Commission on Education, Briefings. London: Heinemann.
33. McSweeney, B. (1988) 'Accounting for the Audit Commission', Political Quarterly59(1): 28-43.
34. Mayston, D. (1992) School Performance Indicators and Performance Related Pay. London: Assistant Masters and Mistresses Association.
35. Megaw Committee (1982) Report of an Inquiry into Civil Service Pay, Vol. 1 (Cmd. 8590). London: HMSO.
36. Morrison, H. and Cowan, P. (1996) 'The State Schools Book: A Critique of a League Table', British Educational Research Journal22(2): 241-249.
37. Mortimore, P., Sammons, P., Stoll, L., Lewis, D. and Ecob, R. (1988) School Matters: the JuniorYears. Wells: Open Books.
38. Murphy, J. (1990) 'Review of The School Effect', School Effectiveness and School Improvement1(1): 81-86.
39. Newcastle Commission (1861) Report of the Commissioners Appointed to Inquire into the State ofPopular Education in England, Vol. 1. British Parliamentary Papers, Session 1861 [2794-I] xxi.
40. Office for Standards in Education (OFSTED) (1995) Guidance on the Inspection of SecondarySchools. London: HMSO.
41. Office for Standards in Education (OFSTED) (1996) The Annual Report of Her Majesty's ChiefInspector of Schools: Standards and Quality in Education 1994/95.London: HMSO.
42. Parkinson, J. (1993) Corporate Power and Responsibility. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
43. Pay and Benefits Bulletin(1995) 'Merit Pay in Education' (July): 5-9.
44. Prime Minister's Office (1991) The Citizen's Charter: Raising the Standard(Cm. 1599). London: HMSO.
45. Prime Minister's Office (1994) The Civil Service: Continuity and Change(Cm. 2627). London: HMSO.
46. Purkey, S. and Smith, M. (1983) 'Effective Schools: A Review', Elementary School Journal83(4): 427-452.
47. Royal Commission on the Civil Service (1955) Report(Cm. 9613: Priestley Commission). London: HMSO.
48. School Teachers' Review Body (1992) First Report(Cm. 1806). London: HMSO.
49. School Teachers' Review Body (1993) Second Report(Cm. 2151). London: HMSO.
50. School Teachers' Review Body (1994a) Third Report(Cm. 2466). London: HMSO.
51. School Teachers' Review Body (1994b) Consulative Document on a PRP Scheme for Heads andDeputy Heads.London: HMSO.
52. School Teachers' Review Body (1995) Fourth Report(Cm. 2765). London: HMSO.
53. School Teachers' Review Body (1996) Fifth Report(Cm. 3095). London: HMSO.
54. School Teachers' Review Body (1997) Sixth Report(Cm. 3536). London: HMSO.
55. School Teachers' Review Body (1998) Seventh Report(Cm. 3836). London: HMSO.
56. Searle, G. (1993) Entrepreneurial Politics in Mid-Victorian Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
57. Smith, D. and Tomlinson, S. (1989) The School Effect: A Study of Multi-Racial Comprehensives. London: Policy Studies Institute.
58. Smith, M. (1996) 'School Attendance in Hertfordshire', Educational Research38(2): 226-236.
59. Stirling, M. (1996) 'Government Policy and Disadvantaged Children', in E. Blyth and J. Milner (eds) Exclusion from School: Inter-Professional Issues for Policy and Practice. Routledge: London.
60. Sylvester, R. (1998) 'Teachers Threaten Strike Action over Payment by Results', Daily Telegraph, 20July.
61. Times Education Supplement(1998) 'Opinion: What's the Deal?', 24July.
62. Teachers Pay and Conditions Act (1992) s. 5(2)(d). London: HMSO.
63. Wilcox, B. and Gray, J. (1996) Inspecting Schools: Holding Schools to Account and HelpingSchools to Improve. Buckingham: Open University Press.
64. Wintour, P. and Bright, M. (1998) 'Teachers to be Paid by Results', Observer, 19July.