Molecular systematics of the North American freshwater bivalve genus Quadrula (Unionidae: Ambleminae) based on mitochondrial ND1 sequences

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 1-11

  Serb, Jeanne M ^a   Buhay, Jennifer E ^a   Lydeard, Charles ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA   (United States)

Author keywords

MtDNA; ND1; Phylogeny; Quadrula; Unionidae

Indexed keywords

BIVALVIA; FUSCONAIA; FUSCONAIA SUCCISSA; QUADRULA; QUINCUNCINA; QUINCUNCINA INFUCATA; TRITOGONIA; TRITOGONIA VERRUCOSA; UNIONIDAE;

EID: 0012246253     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1055-7903(03)00026-5     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Baum, D.A., Donoghue, M.J., 1995. Choosing among alternative 'phylogenetic' species concepts. Syst. Bot. 20, 560-573.
2. Bremer, K., 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42, 795-803.
3. Bremer, K., 1994. Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10, 295-304.
4. Brim-Box, J., Williams, J.D., 2000. Unionid mollusks of the Apalachicola Basin in Alabama, Florida, and Georgia. Bull. Alabama Mus. Nat. Hist. 21, 1-143.
5. Burch, J.B., 1975. Freshwater Unionacean clams (Mollusca: Pelecypoda) of North America, Revised ed., Malacological Publications, Hamburg, MI.
6. Cabot, E.L., Beckenback, A.T., 1989. Simultaneous editing of multiple nucleic acid and protein sequences with ESEE. Cabios 5, 233-234.
7. Clarke, A.H., 1982. The recognition of ecophenotypes in Unionidae. In: Miller, A.C. (Ed.), Report of the Freshwater Mussel Workshop, 19-20 May 1981. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Environmental Laboratory, Vicksburg, MS, pp. 46-62.
8. Davis, G.M., 1984. Genetic relationships among some North American Unionidae (Bivalvia): sibling species, convergence, and cladistic relationships. Malacologia 25, 629-648.
9. Davis, G.M., Fuller, S.L.H., 1981. Genetic relationships among recent Unionacea (Bivalvia) of North America. Malacologia 20, 217-253.
10. de Queiroz, K., Donoghue, M.J., 1988. Phylogenetic systematics and the species problem. Cladistics 4, 317-338.
11. de Queiroz, K., Donoghue, M.J., 1990. Phylogenetic systematics and species revisited. Cladistics 6, 83-90.
12. Eagar, R.M.C., 1950. Variation in shape of shell with respect to ecological station. A review dealing with Recent Unionidae and certain species of the Anthracosiidae in Upper Carboniferous times. Proc. R. Soc. Edinburgh, Sect. B 63, 130-148.
13. Eriksson, T., 1999. AutoDecay, Version 4.0.2. Department of Botany, Stockholm University, Stockholm.
14. Farris, J.S., 1974. Formal definitions of paraphyly and polyphyly. Syst. Zool. 23, 548-554.
15. Frierson, L.S., 1927. A classified and annotated check list of the North American naiades. Baylor University Press, Waco, TX.
16. Graf, D.L., O' Foighil, D., 2000. The evolution of brooding characters among the freshwater pearly mussels (Bivalvia: Unionoidea) of North America. J. Moll. Stud. 66, 157-170.
17. Hall, T.A., 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Res. Symp. Ser. 41, 95-98.
18. Lea, I., 1862. Observations on the genus Unio. VIII. Trans. Am. Philos. Soc. 8, 1-146.
19. Lydeard, C., Garner, J.T., Hartfield, P., Williams, J.D., 1999. Freshwater mussels in the Gulf region: Alabama. Gulf of Mexico Science, 125-134.
20. Lydeard, C., Minton, R.L., Williams, J.D., 2000. Prodigious polyphyly in imperiled freshwater pearly mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae): a phylogenetic test of species and generic designations. In: Harper, E.M., Taylor, J.D., Crame, J.A. (Eds.), The Evolutionary Biology of the Bivalvia. Geological Society, London, pp. 145-158, Special Publications 177.
21. Lydeard, C., Mulvey, M., Davis, G.M., 1996. Molecular systematics and evolution of reproductive traits of North American freshwater unionacean mussels (Mollusca: Bivalvia) as inferred from 16S rRNA gene sequences. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B 351, 1593-1603.
22. Maddison, D.R., Maddison, W.P., 2000. MacClade 4, Analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Version 4.0. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
23. Mayden, R.L., 1997. A hierarchy of species concepts: the denouement in the saga of the species problem. In: Claridge, M.F., Dawah, H.A., Wilson, M.R. (Eds.), Species: the units of biodiversity. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp. 381-424.
24. Mishler, B.D., Brandon, R.N., 1987. Individuality, pluralism, and the phylogenetic species concept. Biol. Philos. 2, 397-414.
25. Mulvey, M., Lydeard, C., Pyer, D.L., Hicks, K.M., Brim-Box, J., Williams, J.D., Butler, R.S., 1997. Conservation genetics of North American freshwater mussels Amblema and Megalonaias. Conserv. Biol. 11, 868-878.
26. Ortmann, A.E., 1912. Notes upon the families and genera of the Najades. Ann. Carnegie Mus. 8, 222-365.
27. Ortmann, A.E., 1918. The nayades (freshwater mussels) of the Upper Tennessee drainage. With notes on synonymy and distribution. Proc. Am. Philos. Soc. 57, 521-626.
28. Ortmann, A.E., 1920. Correlation of shape and station in fresh-water mussels (naiades). Proc. Am. Philos. Soc. 59, 269-312.
29. Ortmann, A.E., 1923. The anatomy of certain Unioninae and Anodontinae from the Gulf Drainage. The Nautilus 36, 73-132.
30. Ortmann, A.E., Walker, B., 1922. A new genus and species of American naiades. The Nautilus 35, 1-6.
31. Posada, D., Crandall, K.A., 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14, 817-818.
32. Roe, K.J., Lydeard, C., 1998. Molecular systematics of the freshwater mussel genus Potamilus (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Malacologia 39, 195-205.
33. Shahjahan, R.M., Hughes, K.J., Leopold, R.A., DeVault, J.D., 1995. Lower incubation temperature increases yield of insect genomic DNA isolated by the CTAB method. Biotechniques 19, 332-334.
34. Shimodaira, H., Hasegawa, M., 1999. Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16, 1114-1116.
35. Simon, C., Frati, F., Beckenbach, A., Crespi, B., Liu, H., Flook, P., 1994. Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase reaction primers. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 87, 651-701.
36. Simpson, C.T., 1900. Synopsis of the naiades, or pearly fresh-water mussels. Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus. 22, 501-1044.
37. Simpson, C.T., 1914. A descriptive catalogue of the naiades or pearly fresh-water mussels. Parts I-III. Bryant Walker, Detroit, MI, xii + 1540 pp.
38. Stansbery, D.H., 1983. Some sources of nomenclatorial and systematic problems in unionid mollusks. In: Miller, A.C. (Ed.), Report of the Freshwater Mussel Workshop, 26-27 October 1982. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Environmental Laboratory, Vicksburg, MS, pp. 46-62.
39. Sterki, V., 1907. Note on Tritogonia tuberculata. The Nautilus 21, 48.
40. Swofford, D.L., 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (* and other methods). Version 4.0b10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
41. Turgeon, D.D., Quinn Jr., J.F., Bogan, A.E., Coan, E.V., Hochberg, F.G., Lyons, W.G., Mikkelsen, P.M., Neves, R.J., Roper, C.F.E., Rosenberg, G., Roth, B., Scheltema, A., Thompson, F.G., Vecchinoe, M., Williams, J.D., 1998. Common and scientific names of aquatic invertebrates from the United States and Canada: mollusks, second ed. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD, Special Publication 26.
42. Watters, G.T., 1994. Form and function of unionoidean shell sculpture and shape (Bivalvia). Am. Malacol. Bull. 11, 1-20.
43. Williams, J.D., Mulvey, M., 1994. Recognition of freshwater mussel taxa: a conservation challenge. In: Meffe, G.K., Carroll, C.R. (Eds.), Principles of Conservation Biology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, pp. 57-58.
44. Williams, J.D., Warren Jr., M.L., Cummings, K.S., Harris, J.L., Neves, R.J., 1993. Conservation status of freshwater mussels of the United States and Canada. Fisheries 18, 6-22.