Molecular systematics of the freshwater mussel genus Potamilus (Bivalvia: Unionidae)

Malacologia

Volumn 39, Issue 1-2, 1998, Pages 195-205

  Roe, Kevin J ^a   Lydeard, Charles ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cytochrome c oxidase subunit I; Potamilus; Unionidae

Indexed keywords

BATHYLACO NIGRICANS; BIVALVIA; LAMPSILIS ORNATA; LEPTODEA FRAGILIS; POTAMILUS; POTAMILUS CAPAX; POTAMILUS INFLATUS; POTAMILUS OHIENSIS; POTAMILUS PURPURATUS; UNIONIDAE;

EID: 0032325119     PISSN: 00762997     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. BOGAN, A. E., J. D. WILLIAMS & S. L. H. FULLER, 1990, Comments on the proposed conservation of Proptera Rafinesque, 1819 (Mollusca: Bivalvia). Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 47: 206-207.
2. BURCH, J. B., 1975, Freshwater unionacean clams (Mollusca: Pelecypoda) of North America revised edition. Malacological Publications, Hamburg, Michigan 204 pp.
3. BZN, 1992, Opinion 1665, Potamilus Rafinesque, 1818 (Mollusca, Bivalvia): not suppressed. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 49: 81-82.
4. CABOT, E. L. & A. T. BECKENBACH, 1989, Simultaneous editing of multiple nucleic acid and protein sequences with ESEE. Computer Applications in the Biosciences, 5: 233-234.
5. CLARKE, A. H., 1981, The freshwater molluscs of Canada. National Museum of Natural Sciences, Ottawa, Canada. 446 pp.
6. COKER, R. E. & T. SURBER, 1911, A note on the metamorphosis of the mussel Lampsilis laevissimus. Biological Bulletin, 20: 179-182.
7. CONRAD, T. A., 1838, Monography of the family Unionidae or naiades of Lamarck. J. Dobson, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, p. 95, pl. 52.
8. CUNNINGHAM, C. W., N. W. BLACKSTONE & L. W. BUSS, 1992, Evolution of king crabs from hermit crab ancestors. Nature, 355: 539-542.
9. DAVIS, G. M., 1983, Relative roles of molecular genetics, anatomy, morphometrics and ecology in assessing relationships among North American Unionidae (Bivalvia). Systematics Association Special Volume No. 24., Protein polymorphism: adaptive and taxonomic significance. G. S. OXFORD & D. ROLLINSON, eds. Academic Press, London, pp. 193-222.
10. FELSENSTEIN, J. F., 1985, Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution, 39: 783-791.
11. FOLMER, O., W. R. HOEH, M. B. BLACK & R. L. VRIJENHOEK, 1994, DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome C oxidase subunit I from metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology, 3(5): 294-299.
12. FRIERSON, L. S., 1898, Unio (Lampsilis) amphichaenus. n. sp. Nautilus 11: 109-110.
13. FRIERSON, L. S., 1927, A classified and annotated checklist of the North American naiades. Baylor University Press, Waco, Texas. 111 pp.
14. GREEN, J., 1832, Notes of a naturalist. Cabinet of Natural History and American Rural Sports, 2: 209-291.
15. GRAYBEAL, A., 1993, The phylogenetic utility of cytochrome b: lessons from Bufonid frogs. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 2: 256-269.
16. GYLLENSTEN, U. B. & H. A. ERLICH, 1988, Generation of single stranded DNA by the polymerase chain reaction and its application to direct sequencing of the HLA-DQA locus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 85: 7652-7656.
17. HILLIS, D. M. & J. P. HUELSENBECK, 1992, Signal, noise, and reliability in molecular phylogenetic analyses. Journal of Heredity, 83: 189-195.
18. HOEH, W. R., 1990, Phylogenetic relationships among eastern North American Anodonta (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Malacological Review, 23: 63-82.
19. HOEH, W. R., D. T. STEWART, B. W. SUTHERLAND & E. ZOUROS, 1996, Multiple origins of gender-associated mitochondrial DNA lineages in bivalves (Mollusca: Bivalvia). Evolution, 50: 2276-2286.
20. HOGGARTH, M. A., 1988, The use of glochidia in the systematics of the Unionidae (Mollusca: Bivalvia). Ph.D. Dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus, 340 pp.
21. JOHNSON, R. I., 1970, The systematics and zoogeography of the Unionidae (Mollusca: Bivalvia) of the southeastern Atlantic slope. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, 140: 263-450.
22. KIMURA, M., 1980, A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 16: 111-120.
23. KLUGE, A. G., 1989, A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypotheses of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Systematic Zoology 18: 1-32.
24. KUMAR, S., K. TAMURA & M. NEI, 1993, MEGA: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis. Version 1.01. The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, 130 pp.
25. LAMARCK, J. B. P. A., 1819, Histoire naturelle des animaux sans vertebrès. Vol. VI, p. 71.
26. LEA, I., 1831, Observations on the naiades and descriptions of new species of that and other families. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 4: 63-121.
27. LEA, I., 1852, Descriptions of new species of the family Unionidae. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 5: 252.
28. LEA, I., 1856, Descriptions of four new exotic uniones. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 8: 103.
29. LEA, I., 1858, Descriptions of twelve new uniones of the United States. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 2: 165.
30. LI, W.-H., 1993, So, what about the molecular clock hypothesis?. Current Opinion in Genetics and Development, 3: 896-901.
31. LIU, H-P., J. B. MITTON & S. J. HERRMANN, 1996a, Genetic differentiation in and management recommendations for the freshwater mussel, Pyganodon grandis (Say, 1829). American Malacological Bulletin, 13: 117-124.
32. LIU, H-P., J. B. MITTON & S-K. WU, 1996b, Paternal mitochondrial DNA differentiation far exceeds maternal mitochondrial DNA and allozyme differentiation in the freshwater mussel, Anodonta grandis grandis. Evolution, 50(2): 952-957.
33. LYDEARD, C., M. MULVEY & G. M. DAVIS, 1996, Molecular systematics and evolution of reproductive traits of North American freshwater unionacean mussels (Mollusca: Bivalvia) as inferred from 16s rRNA DNA sequences. Transactions of the Royal Society (London) (B) 351: 1593-1603.
34. LYDEARD, C. & K. J. ROE, 1997, The phylogenetic utility of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene for inferring relationships of actinopterygian fishes. pp. 281-299, in: C. STEPIAN & T. KOCHER, eds., Molecular biology of fishes, Academic Press.
35. MAYDEN, R. L. & R. M. WOOD, 1995, Systematics, species concepts, and the evolutionary significant unit in biodiversity and conservation biology. American Fisheries Society Symposium, 17: 58-113.
36. McMAHON, R. F., 1993, Mollusca: Bivalvia. Pp. 315-399, in: J. H. THORPE, & A. P. COVITCH, eds., Ecology and classification of North American freshwater invertebrates. Academic Press, San Diego.
37. MILINKOVITCH, M. C., G. ORTI & A. MEYER, 1993, Revised phylogeny of whales suggested by mitochondrial ribosomal DNA sequences. Nature, 361: 346-348.
38. MORITZ, C. T., 1994, Defining 'evolutionary significant units' for conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 9: 373-375.
39. MORRISON, J. P. E., 1969, The earliest names for North American naiads. American Malacological Union Annual Reports, for 1969: 22-24.
40. MORRISON, J. P. E., 1975, Maryland and Virginia mussels of Lister. Bulletin of the American Malacological Union, for 1974: 36-39.
41. MULVEY, M., C. LYDEARD, D. L. PEYER, K. M. HICKS, J. BRIMBOX, J. D. WILLIAMS & R. S. BUTLER, 1997, Conservation genetics of North American freshwater mussels Amblema and Megalonaias. Conservation Biology, 11: 868-878.
42. OESCH, R. D., 1984, Missouri naiades: a guide to the mussels of Missouri. Missouri Department of Conservation. Jefferson City, Missouri 270 pp.
43. ORTMANN, A. E., 1912, Notes upon the families and genera of the naiades. Annals of the Carnegie Museum, 8: 222-365.
44. RAFINESQUE, C. S., 1818, Discoveries in natural history, made during a journey through the western region of the United States, by Constantine Samuel Rafinesque, esq. addressed to Samuel L. Mitchill, president and other members of the Lyceum of Natural History, in a letter dated at Louisville, falls of Ohio, 20th July, 1818. American Monthly Magazine and Critical Review, 3: 354-355
45. RAFINESQUE, C. S., 1819, Prodrome de 70 nouveaux genres d'animaux découverts dans l'intériens des Etats-Unis d'Amérique, durant l'année 1818. Journal de Physique, 88: 417-429.
46. RAFINESQUE, C. S., 1820, Monographie des coquilles bivalves fluviatiles de la Riviere Ohio, contenant douze genres et soixantehuit especies. Annales Generales des Sciences Physiques, Bruxelles, 5: 287-322.
47. ROE, K. J., D. CONKEL & C. LYDEARD, 1997a, Molecular systematics of middle american cichlid fishes and the evolution of trophic types in 'Cichlasoma (Amphilophus)' and 'C. (Thorichthys)'. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 7: 366-376.
48. ROE, K. J., A. M. SIMONS & P. HARTFIELD, 1997b, Identification of a fish host of the inflated heelsplitter Potamilus inflatus (Bivalvia: Unionidae) with a description of its glochidium. American Midland Naturalist, 138: 48-54.
49. SAY, T., 1817, Conchology. in: William Nicholson, American edition of the British encyclopedia, 1st edition. Samuel A. Mitchell and Horace Ames, Philadelphia.
50. SIMPSON, C. T., 1914, A descriptive catalog of the naiades, or pearly freshwater mussels. 1540 pp., Bryant Walker, Detroit, Michigan.
51. SWOFFORD, D. L., 1993, RAUP: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony. Version 3.1.1 Illinois Natural History Survey Champaign.
52. SURBER, T., 1912, Identification of the glochidia of freshwater mussels. U.S. Bureau of Fisheries Document 771: 10 pp., 3 pl.
53. SURBER, T., 1915, Identification of the glochidia of freshwater mussels. U.S. Bureau of Fisheries Document 813: 11 pp., 1 pl.
54. TURGEON, D. D., A. E. BOGAN, E. V. COAN, W. K. EMERSON, W. G. LYONS, W. L. PRATT, C. F. E. ROPER, A. SCHELTEMA, F. G. THOMPSON & G. D. WILLIAMS, 1988, Common and scientific names of aquatic invertebrates from the United States and Canada: mollusks. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 16:vii + 277 pp., 12 pls.
55. U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, 1992, Inflated heelsplitter, (Potamilus inflatus) technical agency draft recovery plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Jackson, Mississippi. 20 pp.
56. UTTERBACK, W. I., 1915, The naiades of Missouri. American Midland Naturalist, 4: 1-29, 41-53, 97-152, 181-204, 244-273.
57. VALENTINE, B. D. & D. H. STANSBERY, 1971, An introduction to the naiads of the Lake Texoma region, with notes on the Red River fauna. Sterkiana, 42: 1-40.
58. VIGILANT, L., M. STONEKING, H. HARPENDING, K. HAWKES & A. C. WILSON, 1991, African populations and the evolution of human mitochondrial DNA. Science, 253: 1503-1507.
59. WAYNE, R. K., S. K. GEORGE, D. GILBERT, P. W. COLLINS, S. D. KOVACH, D. GIRMAN & N. LEHMAN, 1991, Molecular distance and divergence time in carnivores and primates. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 8: 297-319.
60. WILLIAMS, J. D., M. L. WARREN Jr., K. S. CUMMINGS, J. L. HARRIS & R. J. NEVES, 1992, Conservation Status of the freshwater mussels of the United States and Canada. Fisheries, 18(9): 6-22.
61. WILSON, A. C., H. OCHMAN & E. M. PRAGER, 1987, Molecular time scale for evolution. Trends in Genetics, 3: 241-247.