Nature conservation and timber production in areas with fragmented ownership patterns

Forest Policy and Economics

Volumn 1, Issue 3-4, 2000, Pages 209-223

  Ask, Peter ^a   Carlsson, Mattias ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Landscape perspective; Monte Carlo simulation; Nature conservation; Non industrial private forest; Semi standardized interview; Timber production

Indexed keywords

EID: 0011052235     PISSN: 13899341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s1389-9341(00)00016-2     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Ahti T., Hämet-Ahti L., Jalas J. Vegetation zones and their sections in northwestern Europe. Ann. Bot. Fennici. 5:1968;169-211.
2. Angelstam P., Pettersson B. Principles of present Swedish forest biodiversity management. In: Hansson, L. (Ed.), Boreal ecosystems and landscapes: structures, processes and conservation of biodiversity. Ecol. Bull. (Copenhagen). 46:1997;191-203.
3. Anonymous, 1993. Statistical yearbook of forestry 1993. Official statistics of Sweden. The National Board of Forestry, Jönköping, Sweden.
4. Anonymous, 1994. Biologisk mångfald i Sverige (in Swedish). Monitor 14. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Solna, Sweden.
5. Anonymous, 1995. Datainsamling vid inventering av nyckelbiotoper (in Swedish). The National Board of Forestry, Jönköping, Sweden.
6. Anonymous, 1996. Redovisning av omfattningen och innebörden av biotopskydd, naturvårdsavtal, frivilliga avsättningar mm (in Swedish). The National Board of Forestry, Jönköping, Sweden.
7. Baskent E.Z., Jordan G.A. Characterizing spatial structure of forest landscapes. Can. J. For. Res. 25:1995;1830-1849.
8. Berg Å., Ehnström B., Gustafsson L., Hallingbäck T., Jonsell M., Weslien J. Threatened plant, animal, and fungus species in Swedish forests: distribution and habitat association. Conservation Biol. 8(3):1994;718-731.
9. Drakenberg B., Ehnström B.A., Liljelund L-E., Österberg K. Lövskogens naturvärden (in Swedish). 1991;Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Solna, Sweden.
10. Duinker P.N., Carlsson M., Gluck M., Plinte R., Venevskaia I. Biodiversity of Siberian forests: concepts, preliminary analyses, and proposed research directions. WP-96-79. 1996;IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria.
11. Fahrig L., Merriam G. Conservation of fragmented populations. Ehrenfeld D. Readings from Conservation Biology. The Landscape Perspective. 1995;16-25 A joint publication of the Society of Conservation Biology and Blackwell Science, USA.
12. Fielding N. Qualitative interviewing. Gilbert N. Researching Social Life. 1993;135-153 Sage Publications, London, Newbury Park, New Dehli.
13. Forman R.T.T. Land Mosaics. The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions. 1995;Cambridge University Press.
14. Forman R.T.T., Gordon M. Landscape Ecology. 1986;John Wiley & Sons, New York.
15. Foster D.R. Disturbance history, community organization and vegetation dynamics of the old-growth Pisgah forest, south-western New Hampshire, U.S.A. J. Ecol. 76:1988;105-134.
16. Franklin J.F., Forman R.T.T. Creating landscape patterns by forest cutting: ecological consequences and principles. Landscape Ecol. 1(1):1987;5-18.
17. Franklin J.F. Preserving biodiversity: species, ecosystems, or landscapes. Ecol. Appl. 3:1993;202-205.
18. Freemark K.E., Dunning J.B., Hejl S.J., Probst J.R. A landscape ecology perspective for research, conservation, and management. Martin T., Finch D. Ecology and Management of Neotropical Migratory Birds. 1995;Oxford University.
19. Fries C., Carlsson M., Dahlin B., Lämås T., Sallnäs O. A review of conceptual landscape planning models for multiobjective forestry in Sweden. Can. J. For. Res. 28:1998;159-167.
20. Fritz Ö., Larsson K. Betydelsen av skoglig kontinuitet för rödlistade lavar. En studie av halländsk bokskog (in Swedish with English summary). Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 91:1997;241-262.
21. Hallingbäck T., Weibull H. En värdepyramid av mossor för naturvårdsbedömning av ädellövskog (in Swedish with English summary). Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 90:1996;129-140.
22. Hanski I. Patch-occupancy dynamics in fragmented landscapes. TREE. 9(4):1994;131-135.
23. Hansson L. Vertebrate distributions relative to clear-cut edges in a boreal forest landscape. Landscape Ecol. 9(2):1994;105-115.
24. Hawkins V., Selman P. Landscape ecological planning and the future countryside: a research note. Landscape Res. 19(2):1994;88-94.
25. Hobbs R.J. Fragmented landscapes in Western Australia. Biol. Conserv. 64(3):1993;183-238.
26. Hyberg B.T., Holthausen D.M. The behavior of nonindustrial private forest landowners. Can. J. For. Res. 19(8):1989;1014-1023.
27. Hytönen M. Multiple-Use Forestry in the Nordic Countries. 1995;Finnish Forest Research Institute, Vantaa, Finland.
28. Hänninen H. Forestry extension and the changing structure of forest ownership. Muuttuva metsanomistaja kunta neuvonnan kohteena. Tyotehoseuran Metsatiedote. 8(516):1993;6.
29. Ihalainen R. Structural changes in Finnish nonindustrial private forest ownership: a survey of the literature 1960-89. Folia Forestalia. 750:1990;52.
30. Kangas J., Kuusipalo J. Integrating biodiversity into forest management planning and decision-making. For. Ecol. Manage. 61:1993;1-15.
31. Lacy R.C. Loss of genetic diversity from managed populations: interacting effects of drift, mutation, immigration, selection and population subdivision. Conserv. Biol. 1:1987;143-158.
32. Levins R. Extinction. Gerstenhaber M. Lectures on Mathematics in the Life Sciences, vol. 2. 1970;77-107 American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, USA.
33. Lindhagen, A., 1996. Forest recreation in Sweden: four case studies using quantitative and qualitative methods. Dissertation. Department of Environmental Forestry, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.
34. Lorimer C.G. Methodological considerations in the analysis of forest disturbance history. Can. J. For. Res. 15(1):1983;200-213.
35. MacArthur R.H., Wilson E.O. The Theory of Island Biogeography. 1967;Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
36. McGarigal, K., Marks, B.J., 1994. FRAGSTAS: Spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. Unpublished report available from the Forest Science Department, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.
37. Naesset E. A spatial decision support system for long-term forest management planning by means of linear programming and a geographical information system. Scand. J. For. Res. 12:1997;77-88.
38. Nalli A., Nuutinen T., Päivinen R. Site-specific constrains in integrated forest planning. Scand. J. For. Res. 11:1996;85-96.
39. Nilsson S.G., Arup U., Baranowski R., Ekman S. Tree-dependent lichens and beetles as indicators in conservation forests. Conserv. Biol. 9(5):1995;1208-1215.
40. Nilsson S.G., Baranowski R. Indikatorer på jätteträdskontinuitet - svenska förekomster av knäppare (Coleoptera: Elateridae) beroende av grova, levande träd (in Swedish with English summary). Entomol. Tidskr. 115(3):1994;81-97.
41. Nilsson S.G., Ericsson L. Conservation of plants and animal populations in theory and practice. Ecol. Bull. 46:1997;117-139.
42. Nilsson S.G. Forests in the temperate-boreal transition: natural and man-made features. Ecol. Bull. 46:1997;61-71.
43. Nitare J., Norén M. Nyckelbiotoper kartläggs i nytt projekt vid Skogsstyrelsen (in Swedish with English summary). Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 86:1992;219-226.
44. Noss R.F. A regional landscape approach to maintain biodiversity. BioScience. 33:1983;700-706.
45. O'Connell M.A., Noss R.F. Private land management for biodiversity conservation. Environ. Manage. 16(4):1992;435-450.
46. O'Hara K.L., Oliver C.D. Silviculture: achieving new objectives through stand and landscape management. Western Wildlands. 17:1992;28-33.
47. Pimm S.L., Jones H.L., Diamond J. On the risk of extinction. Am. Nat. 132:1988;757-785.
48. Primack R.B. Essentials of Conservation Biology. 1993;Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, USA.
49. Pukkala T., Kellomäki S., Mustonen E. Prediction of the amenity of a tree stand. Scand. J. For. Res. 3(4):1988;533-544.
50. Quinn J.F., Hastings A. Extinction in subdivided habitats. Ehrenfeld D. Readings from Conservation Biology. The Landscape Perspective. 1995;26-36 A joint publication of Society of Conservation Biology and Blackwell Science, USA.
51. Saunders D.A., Hobbs R.J., Margules C.R. Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Ehrenfeld D. Readings from Conservation Biology. The Landscape Perspective. 1995;1-15 A joint publication of Society of Conservation Biology and Blackwell Science, USA.
52. Savolainen R., Kellomäki S. Scenic value of the forest landscape as assessed in the field and the laboratory. Commun. Inst. For. Fenniae. 120:1994;73-80.
53. Sennblad, G., 1988. Survey of logging and silviculture in non-industrial private forestry in Sweden 1984. Part 2. Private forest owners and their holdings in Sweden 1984. Department of Operational Efficiency, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Garpenberg, Report 176, 35 pp.
54. Stjernquist P. Forest Treatment. Relations to Nature of Swedish Private Forestry. 1992;Almqvist and Wiksell International, Stockholm, Sweden.
55. Stora Skog, 1993. Ecological Landscape Planning: The Grangärde Area as a Model. Stora Skog falun, Sweden.
56. Thörnquist, K., 1998. Ecological landscape planning in Swedish forestry. Integrating environmental values into forest planning. In: EFI Proceedings, European Forest Institute, Joensuu, Finland.
57. Young R.A., Reichenbach M.R., Perkuhn F.H. PNIF management: a social-psychological study of owners in Illinois. North. J. Appl. For. 2(3):1985;91-94.