Public/private partnerships in the United States

Industry and Innovation

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 191-217

  Link, Albert ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0008867739     PISSN: 13662716     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13662719900000011     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA) 1995: The Technology Reinvestment Project: Dual Use Innovations for a Strategic Defense. Washington, DC: Department of Defense.
2. Bator, Francis 1958: The anatomy of market failure, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 351-379.
3. Berger, Robert E., Little, Craig J. and Saavedra, Pedro J. 1992: Commercialization activities in the SBIR program, Part 1 and Part 2, Journal of Technology Transfer, Fall: 27-44.
4. Carr, Robert K. 1997: Federal Technology Expenses, mimeographed.
5. Chapman, Gary 1994: Congressional testimony, http://www.utexas.edu/lbj/21cp/testimony/html.
6. Coburn, Christopher 1995: Partnerships: a Compendium of State and Federal Technology Programs. Columbus, OH: Battelle Press.
7. Council on Competitiveness 1996: Endless Frontier, Limited Resources: U.S. R&D Policy for Competitiveness. Washington, DC: Council on Competitiveness.
8. Economic Report of the President 1994: Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
9. Erdilek, Asim 1989: Coalitions, cooperative research, and technology development in the globalization of the semiconductor industry, in Albert N. Link and Gregory Tassey (eds.), Cooperative Research and Development: the Industry, University, Government Relationship. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic, pp. 187-208.
10. Institute of Defense Analysis 1994: The Economic Impacts of Technology Investments, final reports to DARPA.
11. Jaffe, Adam 1998: The importance of 'spillovers' in the policy mission of the Advanced Technology Program, Journal of Technology Transfer, 11-19.
12. Leyden, Dennis P. and Link, Albert N. 1999: Federal laboratories as research partners, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 17(4): 575-592.
13. Link, Albert N. 1996a: Evaluating Public Sector Research and Development. Westport, CT: Praeger.
14. Link, Albert N. 1996b: Research joint ventures: patterns from Federal Register filings, Review of Industrial Organization, October: 617-628.
15. Link, Albert N. 1998a: Case study of R&D efficiency in an ATP joint venture, Journal of Technology Transfer, 43-52.
16. Link, Albert N. 1998b: Public/Private Partnerships as a Tool to Support Industrial R&D: Experiences in the United States, final report to the OECD Working Group on Innovation and Technology.
17. Link, Albert N. 1998c: The US display consortium: analysis of a public/private partnership, Industry and Innovation, 5: 35-50.
18. Link, Albert N. and Bauer, Laura L. 1989: Cooperative Research in U.S. Manufacturing: Assessing Policy Initiatives and Corporate Strategics. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
19. Link, Albert N. and Scott, John T. 1998a: Assessing the infrastructural needs of a technology-based service sector: a new approach to technology policy planning, STI Review, 171-207.
20. Link, Albert N. and Scott, John T. 1998b: Public Accountability: Evaluating Technology-Based Institutions. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
21. Link, Albert N., Teece, David J. and Finan, William F. 1996: Estimating the benefits from collaboration: the case of SEMATECH, Review of Industrial Organization, October 737-751.
22. National Academy of Sciences 1995: Allocating Federal Funds for Science and Technology. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
23. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) 1995: Delivering Results: a Progress Report from the National Institute of Standards and Technology. Gaithersburg, MD: NIST.
24. National Science Board 1996: Science & Engineering Indicators 1996. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
25. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 1996: Economic Analysis of Federal Regulations Under Executive Order 12866, mimeographed.
26. Office of the President 1990: U.S. Technology Policy. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President, September 26.
27. Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) 1995: The Effectiveness of the Research and Experimentation Tax Credits. Washington, DC: Congress of the United States.
28. Office of Technology Policy 1996: Effective Partnering: a Report to Congress on Federal Technology Partnerships. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce.
29. Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) 1998: Technology, Productivity and Job Creation: Toward Best Policy Practice. Paris: OECD.
30. Ruegg, Rosalie T. 1998: The Advanced Technology Program, its evaluation plan, and progress in implementation, Journal of Technology Transfer, 5-9.
31. Tassey, Gregory 1995: Technology and Economic Growth: Implications for Federal Policy, NIST Planning Report 95-3. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
32. Teece, David J. 1980: Economies of scope and the scope of the enterprise, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 223-247.
33. United States General Accounting Office (GAO) 1994: Technology Transfers: Benefits of Cooperative R&D Agreements. Washington, DC: United States General Accounting Office.
34. United States General Accounting Office (GAO) 1996a: The Advanced Technology Program and Private-Sector Funding. Washington, DC: United States General Accounting Office.
35. United States General Accounting Office (GAO) 1996b: Federal R&D Laboratories. Washington, DC: United States General Accounting Office.