Attention and automaticity: Toward a theoretical integration

Psychological Research

Volumn 62, Issue 2-3, 1999, Pages 165-181

  Logan, Gordon D ^a   Taylor, Stanley E ^a   Etherton, Joseph L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0007097261     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s004260050049     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press.
2. Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 340-357.
3. Battig, W. F., & Montague, W. E. (1969). Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 80, 1-46.
4. Boronat, C. B., & Logan, G. D. (1997). The role of attention in automatization: Does attention operate at encoding, or retrieval, or both? Memory and Cognition, 25, 36-46.
5. Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. London: Pergammon.
6. Broadbent, D. E. (1971). Decision and stress. London: Academic Press.
7. Bundesen, C. (1987). Visual attention: Race models for selection from multielement displays. Psychological Research, 49, 113-121.
8. Bundesen, C. (1990). A theory of visual attention. Psychological Review, 97, 523-547.
9. Bundesen, C., Pedersen, L. F., & Larsen, A. (1984). Measuring efficiency of selection form briefly exposed visual displays: A model for partial report. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 329-339.
10. Bundesen, C., Shibuya, H., & Larsen, A. (1985). Visual selection from multielement displayus: A model for partial report. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and Performance XI (pp. 631-649).Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Cave, K. R., & Wolfe, J. M. (1990). Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 225-271.
12. Deutsch, J. A., & Deutsch, D. (1963). Attention: Some theoretical considerations. Psychological Review, 70, 80-90.
13. Haider, H., & Frensch, P. A. (1996). The role of information reduction in skill acquisition. Cognitive Psychology, 30, 304-337.
14. Hollender, D. (1986). Semantic activation without conscious identification in dichotic listening, parafoveal vision, and visual masking. Brain and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1-23.
15. Humphreys, M. S., Bain, J. D., & Pike, R. (1989). Different ways to cue a coherent memory system: A theory for episodic, semantic, and procedural tasks. Psychological Review, 96, 208-233.
16. Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541.
17. Kahneman, D., & Chajczyck, D. (1983). Tests of the automaticity of reading: Dilution of Stroop effects by color-irrelevant stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 497-509.
18. Kahneman, D., & Henik, A. (1981). Perceptual organization and attention. In M. Kubovy & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.), Perceptual organization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Kucera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown Univeristy Press.
20. LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293-323.
21. Logan, G. D. (1980). Attention and automaticity in Stroop and priming tasks: Theory and data. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 523-533.
22. Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492-527.
23. Logan, G. D. (1990). Repetition priming and automaticity: Common underlying mechanisms? Cognitive Psychology, 22, 1-35.
24. Logan, G. D. (1992). Shapes of reaction time distributions and shapes of learning curves: A test of the instance theory of automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 883-914.
25. Logan, G. D. (1996). The CODE theory of visual attention: An integration of space-based and object-based attention. Psychological Review, 103, 603-649.
26. Logan, G. D., & Bundesen, C. (1996). Spatial effects in the partial report paradigm: A challenge for theories of visual spatial attention. In D. L. Medin (Ed.)., The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 35, pp. 243-282). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
27. Logan, G. D., & Etherton, J. L. (1994). What is learned during automatization? The role of attention in constructing an instance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1022-1050.
28. Logan, G. D., & Klapp, S. T. (1991). Automatizing alphabet arithmetic: I. Is extended practice necessary to produce automaticity? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 179-195.
29. Logan, G. D., Taylor, S. E., & Etherton, J. L. (1996). Attention in the acquisition and expression of automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 620-638.
30. Mayall, K., & Humphreys, G. W. (1996). Case mixing and the task-sensitive disruption of lexical processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 278-294.
31. Medin, D. L., & Smith, E. E. (1984). Concepts and concept formation. Annual Review of Psychology, 35, 113-138.
32. Miller, J. (1988). Components of the location probability effect in visual search tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 453-471.
33. Monsell, S., Doyle, M. C., & Haggard, P. N. (1989). The effects of frequency upon visual word recognition: Where are they? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 43-71.
34. Naveh-Benjamin, M. (1987). Coding of spatial location information: An automatic process? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 595-605.
35. Naveh-Benjamin, M. (1988). Recognition memory of spatial location information: Another failure to support automaticity. Memory and Cognition, 16, 437-445.
36. Newell, A.,& Rosenbloom, P. S. (1981). Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. In J. R. Anderson (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition (pp. 1-55). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. Norman, D. A. (1968). Toward a theory of memory and attention. Psychological Review, 75, 522-536.
38. Nosofsky, R. M., & Palmeri, T. J. (1997). A exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification. Psychological Review, 104, 266-300.
39. Palmeri, T. J. (1997). Exemplar similarity and the development of automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 324-354.
40. Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1997). A counter model for implicit priming in perceptual word recognition. Psychological Review, 104, 319-343.
41. Roediger, H. L. III (1990). Implicit memory: Retention without remembering. American Psychologist, 45, 1043-1056.
42. Schneider, W. (1985). Toward a model of attention and the development of automatic processing. In M. I. Posner & O. S. Marin (Eds.), Attention and Performance XI (pp. 475-492). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Schneider, W., & Detweiler, M. (1987). A connectionist/control architecture for working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol 21, pp. 53-119). New York: Academic Press.
44. Shibuya, H. (1993). Efficiency of visual selection in duplex and conjunction conditions in partial report. Perception & Psychophysics, 54, 716-732.
45. Shibuya, H., & Bundesen, C., (1988). Visual selection from multi-element displays; Measuring and modeling effects of exposure duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 591-600.
46. Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing. II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127-190.
47. Shiffrin, R. M., & Steyvers, M. (1997). A model for recognition memory: REM - retrieving effectively from memory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 145-166.
48. Smith, M. C. (1979). Contextual facilitation in a letter search task depends on how the prime is processed. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 239-251.
49. Smith , M. C., Theodore, L., & Franklin, P. E. (1983). The relationship between contextual facilitation and depth of processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 697-712.
50. Stadler, M. A. (1995). Role of attention in implicit learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 674-685.
51. Treisman, A., Vieira, A., & Hayes, A. (1992). Automaticity and preattentive processing. American Journal of Psychology, 105, 341-362.
52. Uyeda, K. M., & Mandler, G. (1980). Prototypically norms for 28 semantic categores. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 12, 587-595.
53. Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., & Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search; An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 419-433.