Concluding remarks - Finding ways to integrate timber production and Biodiversity in Fennoscandian Forestry

Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 119-123

  Niemelä, Jari ^a   Larsson, Stig ^b   Simberloff, Daniel ^c  

^a Department of Ecology and Systematics ^*  (Finland)

^b SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0003228009     PISSN: 02827581     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/028275801300090744     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Angelstam, P. & Andersson, L. 2001. Estimates of the needs for forest reserves in Sweden. Scand. J. For. Res. Suppl. 3: 38-51.
2. Ehnström, B. 2001. Leaving dead wood for insects in boreal forests-suggestions for the future. Scand. J. For. Res. Suppl. 3: 91-99.
3. Esseen, P.-A., Ehnström, B., Ericson, L. & Sjöberg, K. 1997. Boreal forests. Ecol. Bull. 46: 16-47.
4. Granström, A. 2001. Fire management for biodiversity in the European boreal forest. Scand. J. For. Res. Suppl. 3: 62-69.
5. Fries, C., Johansson, O., Petterson, B. & Simonsson, B. 1997. Silvicultural models to maintain and restore natural stand structures in Swedish boreal forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 94: 89-103.
6. Hansson, L. 2001. Key habitats in Swedish managed forests. Scand. J. For. Res. Suppl 3: 52-61.
7. Kouki, J., Löfman, S., Martikainen, P., Rouvinen, S. & Uotila, A. 2001. Forest fragmentation in Fennoscandia: linking habitat requirements of wood-associated threatened species to landscape and habitat changes. Scand. J. For. Res. Supp. 3: 27-37.
8. Martikainen, P., Siitonen, J., Punttila, P., Kaila, L. & Rauh, J. 2000. Species richness of Coleoptera in mature managed and old-growth boreal forests in southern Finland. Biol. Conserv. 94: 199-209.
9. Niemelä, J. 1997. Invertebrates and boreal forest management. Conserv. Biol. 11: 601-610.
10. Niemelä, J. 1999. Management in relation to disturbance in the boreal forest. For. Ecol. Manage. 115: 127-134.
11. Niemelä, J. 2001. The utility of movement corridors in forested landscapes. Scand. J. For. Res. Suppl. 3: 70-78.
12. Nilsson, S. G., Hedin, J. & Niklasson, M. 2001. Biodiversity and its assessment in boreal and nemoral forests. Scand. J. For. Res. Suppl 3: 10-26.
13. Pickett, S. T. A., Shachak, M., Ostfeld, R. S. & Likens, G. E. 1997. Toward a comprehensive conservation theory. In Pickett, S. T. A., Ostfeld, R. S., Shachak, M. & Likens, G. E. (eds). The ecological basis of conservation: heterogeneity, ecosystems, and biodiversity, pp. 384-399. Chapman & Hall, London. ISBN 0-412-09851-2.
14. Raivio, S., Normark, E., Pettersson, B. & Salpakivi-Salomaa, P. 2001. Science and the management of boreal forest diversity - a forest industries' view. Scand. J. For. Res. Suppl 3: 100-105.
15. Samuelsson, J., Gustafsson, L. & Ingelög, T. 1994. Dying and dead trees: a review of their importance for biodiversity. Swedish Threatened Species Unit & Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Report 4306. ISBN 91-620-4306-4.
16. Siitonen, J. & Martikainen, P. 1994. Occurrence of rare and threatened insects living on decaying Populus tremula: a comparison between Finnish and Russian Karelia. Scand. J. For. Res. 9: 185-191.
17. Simberloff, D. 2001. Management of boreal forest diversity - a view from the outside. Scand. J. For. Res. Suppl 3: 106-119.
18. Vanha-Majamaa, I. & Jalonen, J. 2001. Green tree retention in Fennoscandian forestry. Scand. J. For. Res. Suppl 3: 79-90.
19. Walters, C. J. & Holling, C. S. 1990. Large-scale management experiments and learning by doing. Ecology 71: 2060-2068.