Teacher receptivity to curriculum change in the implementation stage: The case of environmental education in Hong Kong

Journal of Curriculum Studies

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 95-115

  Chi Kin Lee, John ^a  

^a CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001830685     PISSN: 00220272     EISSN: 13665839     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/002202700182871     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Bishop, G. (1986) Innovation in Education (London: Macmillan).
2. Bridges, E. M. and Reynolds, L. B. (1968) Teacher receptivity to change. Administrator’s Notebook, 16 (6), 1-4.
3. Brown, S. and Mcintyre, D. (1982) Influences upon teachers’ attitudes to different types of innovation: a study of Scottish Integrated Science. Curriculum Inquiry, 12 (1), 35-51.
4. Brown, S. and Mcintyre, D. (1993) Making Sense of Teaching (Buckingham, UK: Open University Press).
5. Carless, D. R. (1997) Managing systemic curriculum change: a critical analysis of Hong Kong’s Target-Oriented Curriculum initiative. International Review of Education, 43 (4), 349-366.
6. Curriculum Development Council (1992) Guidelines on Environmental Education in Schools (Hong Kong: Education Department).
7. Day, C., Johnston, D. and Whitaker, P. (1985) Managing Primary Schools: A Professional Development Approach (London: Harper & Row).
8. Doyle, W. and Ponder, G. A. (1977) The practicality ethic in teacher decision-making. Interchange, 8 (3), 1-12.
9. Fien, J. (1993) Education for the Environment: Critical Curriculum Theorising and Environmental Education (Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press).
10. Fleming, M. (1992) Teachers’ Receptivity to Teaching Models. Doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona.
11. Fullan, M. with Stiegelbauer, S. (1991) The New Meaning of Educational Change, 2nd edn (New York: Teachers College Press).
12. Gayford, C. (1996) Environmental education in schools: an alternative framework. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 1, 104-120.
13. Giacquinta, J. B. (1975) Status, risk, and receptivity to innovations in complex organizations: a study of the responses of four groups of educators to the proposed introduction of sex education in elementary schools. Sociology of Education, 48 (1), 38-58.
14. Gitlin, A. and Margonis, F. (1995) The political aspect of reform: teacher resistance as good sense. American Journal of Education, 103 (4), 377-405.
15. Gough, A. (1997) Education and the Environment: Policy, Trends and the Problems of Marginalisation (Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research).
16. Gough, N. (1989) From epistemology to ecopolitics: renewing a paradigm for curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 21 (3), 225-241.
17. Gough, N. (1992) Blueprints for Greening Schools (Melbourne, Australia: Gould League).
18. Greenall Gough, A. (1990). Red and green: two case studies in learning through ecopolitical action. Curriculum Perspectives, 10 (2), 60-65.
19. Grundy, S. (1987) Curriculum: Product or Praxis? (London: Falmer).
20. Ham, S. H. and Sewing, D. R. (1987/1988) Barriers to environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 19 (2), 17-24.
21. Hungerford, H. R. and Peyton, R. B. (1986) Procedures for Developing an Environmental Education Curriculum: A Discussion Guide for UNESCO Training Seminars on Environmental Education (Paris: UNESCO).
22. Jephcote, M. and Williams, M. (1994) T eacher receptivity to the introduction of economic and industrial understanding. Economics and Business Education, 2 (4), 163-167.
23. Katz, E. H., Dalton, S. and Giacquinta, J. B. (1994) Status risk taking and receptivity of H ome Economics teachers to a statewide curriculum innovation. Home Economics Research Journal, 22 (4), 401-421.
24. Kelleher, R. R. (1981) The Relationship of Three Parts of Field Experience Programs to Student Teacher Open-mindedness, Attitudes Towards Education, and Receptivity to Innovation. Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State Univerisity, East Lansing, MI.
25. LeCompte, M. D. and Preissle, J. (1993) Ethnography and Qualitative Design in Educational Research, 2nd edn (San Diego, CA: Academic Press).
26. Lee, C. K. and Wong, H. W. (1996) Curriculum: Paradigms, Perspectives and Design, 2nd edn (Hong Kong: Chinese University Press).
27. Lee, C. K. J. (1993) Geography teaching in England and Hong Kong: contributions towards environmental education. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 2 (1), 25-40.
28. Lee, J. C. K. (1997) Environmental education in schools in Hong Kong. Environmental Education Research, 3 (3), 359-371.
29. Lee, J. C. K. and Dimmock, C. (1998) Curriculum management in secondary schools during political transition: a Hong Kong perspective. Curriculum Studies, 6 (1), 5-28.
30. Lee, J. C. K. and Gerber, R. (1996) The lived experience of curriculum change: a Hong Kong perspective. Curriculum and Teaching, 11 (1), 35-47.
31. Lieberman, A. and Miller, L. (1992) Teachers—Their World and Their Work: Implications for School Improvement (New York: Teachers College Press).
32. Llewellyn Panel (1982) A Perspective on Education in Hong Kong: Report by a Visiting Panel (Hong Kong: Hong Kong Government).
33. Miles, M. B. and Huberman, A. M. (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, 2nd edn (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).
34. Morris, P. (1995) Curriculum Development in Hong Kong, 2nd edn (Hong Kong: Faculty of Education, University of Hong Kong).
35. Morris, P. (1996) The Hong Kong School Curriculum: Development, Issues and Policies, 2nd edn (Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press).
36. Morris, P. and Marsh, C. (1991) Patterns and dilemmas. In C. Marsh and P. Morris (eds), Curriculum Development in East Asia (London: Falmer), 255-271.
37. Ng, T. L. G. (ed.) (1991) New Environmental Paradigm Survey 1991 (Hong Kong: Hong Kong Environment Centre).
38. Richardson, V. (1991) How and why teachers change. In S. C. Conley and B. S. Cooper (eds), T he School as a Work Environment: Implications for Reform (Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon), 66-87.
39. Robottom, I. (1987a) Contestation and consensus in environmental education. Curriculum Perspectives, 7 (1), 23-27.
40. Robottom, I. (1987b) Towards inquiry-based professional development in environmental education. In I. Robottom (ed.), Environmental Education: Practice and Possibility (Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press), 83-119.
41. Stevenson, R. B. (1987) Schooling and environmental education: contradictions in purpose and practice. In I. Robottom (ed.), Environmental Education: Practice and Possibility (Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press), 69-82.
42. Stevenson, R. B. (1993) Becoming compatible: curriculum and environmental thought. Journal of Environmental Education, 24 (2), 4-9.
43. Stimpson, P. G. (1997) Environmental challenge and curricular responses in Hong Kong. Environmental Education Research, 3 (3), 345-357.
44. Waugh, R. and Godfrey, J. (1993) Teacher receptivity to system-wide change in the implementation stage. British Educational Research Journal, 19 (5), 565-578.
45. Waugh, R. F. and Punch, K. F. (1985) Teacher receptivity to system-wide change. British Educational Research Journal, 11 (2), 113-121.
46. Waugh, R. F. and Punch, K. F. (1987) Teacher receptivity to system-wide change in the implementation stage. Review of Educational Research, 57 (3), 237-254.