메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 50, Issue 7, 1999, Pages 240-251

Phenomenological treatment of dynamic glass transition heterogeneity

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 0001602986     PISSN: 03237648     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4044(19990701)50:7<240::AID-APOL240>3.0.CO;2-H     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (33)

References (79)
  • 31
    • 85034505773 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • J. Korus, thesis, Universität Halle, 1997.
    • J. Korus, thesis, Universität Halle, 1997.
  • 44
    • 85034519161 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • f, and γ = 0. This answers the question if we assume (choose) or find a Levy stable distribution, kindly asked e. g. by Dr. P. Maass, Konstanz.
    • f, and γ = 0. This answers the question if we assume (choose) or find a Levy stable distribution, kindly asked e. g. by Dr. P. Maass, Konstanz.
  • 50
    • 85034503851 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • S. Kahle, M. Beiner, M. Meissner, E. Hempel, E. Donth, to be published.
    • S. Kahle, M. Beiner, M. Meissner, E. Hempel, E. Donth, to be published.
  • 52
    • 85034501379 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • E. Donth, to be published.
    • E. Donth, to be published.
  • 59
    • 33746080237 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Macronwleciiles 1998,31, 8973.
    • (1998) Macronwleciiles , vol.31 , pp. 8973
  • 61
    • 33746041283 scopus 로고
    • Akademie-Verlag, Berlin
    • E. Donth, Glasiibergang, Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, 1981.
    • (1981) Glasiibergang
    • Donth, E.1
  • 62
    • 85034502108 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • ∞).
    • ∞).
  • 66
    • 0002496114 scopus 로고
    • Our model is not the same as Ngai's coupling model
    • Our model is not the same as Ngai's coupling model: K.L. Ngai, Comm. Solid State Pliys. 1979, 9, 127; 1979, 9, 141.
    • (1979) Comm. Solid State Pliys. , vol.9 , pp. 127
  • 76
    • 85034499109 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Confining the frequency region for the exponent a to a small logω interval and permitting some frequency overlap with the x and/or/exponent influences, large a values between 1 < a < 2 cannot longer be strictly excluded by the argument used at Eqs. (3.12) and (3.13) above. The Havriliak analysis [68] shows several examples with a > 1. Such large a values correspond to weak defects; a = 2 would correspond to a Gauss distribution with no defect and no log χ″(logea) wings.
    • Confining the frequency region for the exponent a to a small logω interval and permitting some frequency overlap with the x and/or/exponent influences, large a values between 1 < a < 2 cannot longer be strictly excluded by the argument used at Eqs. (3.12) and (3.13) above. The Havriliak analysis [68] shows several examples with a > 1. Such large a values correspond to weak defects; a = 2 would correspond to a Gauss distribution with no defect and no log χ″(logea) wings.


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.